RightyTighty
VIP Member
- Banned
- #261
I can't help that the person who wrote that didn't write it in the language of either science or law. It was for layman and used language like I am with child or I'm "having" a baby. When you "have" a baby, we get to babysit while you go shopping. I can't do that if - the damn thing is still inside you.What fits in a petri dish isn't a human being. I'll not post it again.Let's keep it very, very simple (which just might help you but I doubt it). A human being - doesn't fit in a petri dish. And there are specific legal requirements. You can't just be a body. It can's just be of human origin, made up of human DNA.If you are this interested then you need to study up - Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term. - PubMed - NCBI
Survival probability of human conceptions from fertilization to term.
Boklage CE1.
Author information
Abstract
Preterm death of the human conceptus is common. A consistent biphasic pattern in the rate of loss from biochemical pregnancy detection to term suggests that most wastage occurs prior to clinical recognition. After simple adjustments for varying methods, existing data show that at least 73% of natural single conceptions have no real chance of surviving 6 weeks of gestation. Of the remainder, about 90% will survive to term. IVF conceptions do nearly as well as natural pregnancies after clinical recognition, but poorly before, despite selecting apparently normal embryos for transfer. Reasons may lie in the uterus more than the embryo itself. Multiple pregnancies may constitute more than 12% of all natural conceptions, of which number about 2% survive to term as twins and about 12% result in single births. In all of these situations, simple equations for exponential decay in a mixture of two populations can accurately describe the distribution of those deaths in time.
PMID:
1970983
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Quote the specific part of that source (or any other) that supports your claim that Human Beings morph out of something created by conception that is anything less than a human being.
Your "position" is that a conception is the same as a person. That's simply not true in the law or in biology. Your argument is an ethical one, that's all, and that's not enough to carry the day which is why induced abortion is still here.
Still waiting for that source that you think supports your claim that human beings morph out of something less than a human being. . .
Moron!
http://np.netpublicator.com/np/n40359630/Raconteur---IVF-spreads.pdf
"When Professor Sir Robert Edwards developed the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) procedure for treating infertility in the 1970s, he was well aware of the ethical issues of creating a human being in a petri dish, but was steadfastly unafraid of the controversy. Objections to his work only died away when it became clear that the babies born by IVF were healthy and that their parents were overjoyed to be able to start a family"