Assholes making trouble in Oregon

[peach174]

They want to have the people of Oregon to vote on it.

If we citizens of Oregon wanted a vote on that, we would have it on a ballot. Confine your insanity to your own state, we Oregonians want none of it.

Gee Wiz
That is the exact same thing that was said when outsiders came to get rid of Gov. Scott and tore up a Gov. building.

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

 

[Camp]

And did anyone bother to ask the state of Oregon about that? Those are outsider assholes, they have no say in the matter at all.

They want to have the people of Oregon to vote on it.

If we citizens of Oregon wanted a vote on that, we would have it on a ballot. Confine your insanity to your own state, we Oregonians want none of it.

Gee Wiz
That is the exact same thing that was said when outsiders came to get rid of Gov. Scott and tore up a Gov. building.

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

You think those two things are comparable? Really. One would require a cleaning crew and repair of what you allege has been "torn up". The other would require funerals and medical expenses.

 

[bodecea]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

 

[bodecea]

If we citizens of Oregon wanted a vote on that, we would have it on a ballot. Confine your insanity to your own state, we Oregonians want none of it.

Gee Wiz
That is the exact same thing that was said when outsiders came to get rid of Gov. Scott and tore up a Gov. building.

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

 

[Camp]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

 

[jon_berzerk]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

no

simply an observation based on libtard postings

 

[jon_berzerk]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

well the way it sits these days

if it is the governments property it certainly is not yours

 

[koshergrl]

Gee Wiz
That is the exact same thing that was said when outsiders came to get rid of Gov. Scott and tore up a Gov. building.

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

Local ranchers who have visited the refuge and the occupants say it's never looked so clean and well cared for.

 

[bodecea]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

no

simply an observation based on libtard postings

An observation, eh....give us some of the evidence you base your observation on....

 

[bodecea]

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

Local ranchers who have visited the refuge and the occupants say it's never looked so clean and well cared for.

Riiiiiight. So says a poster who demonstrated yesterday that she knows nothing about that area.

 

[peach174]

Gee Wiz
That is the exact same thing that was said when outsiders came to get rid of Gov. Scott and tore up a Gov. building.

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

So based on evidence that the left always destroys private and public property and so far none on the right is not evidence?

 

[Camp]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

well the way it sits these days

if it is the governments property it certainly is not yours

Yes, it is, it is the property held in trust for all citizens and future citizens. The government by virtue of elected officials in Congress and the White House have been tasked with managing it. If we don't like the way it is managed we have constitutional provisions that allow us to change how it is managed. Hence, it is our property, including mine as a citizen. I have just as much say in what is done with the land and Bundy. Nothing gives Bundy or any militia member more power and authority than any other single individual citizen. Except the fact that he temporarily has an advantage because he is armed and threatens violence.

 

[jon_berzerk]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

well the way it sits these days

if it is the governments property it certainly is not yours

Yes it is, it is the property held in trust for all citizens and future citizens. The government by virtue of elected officials in Congress and the White House have been tasked with managing it. If we don't like the way it is managed we have constitutional provisions that allow us to change how it is managed. Hence, it is our property, including mine as a citizen. I have just as much say in what is done with the land and Bundy. Nothing gives Bundy or any militia member more power and authority than any other single individual citizen. Except the fact that he temporarily has an advantage because he is armed and threatens violence.

sure what ever

try using it for your own purposes some time

 

[jon_berzerk]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

no

simply an observation based on libtard postings

An observation, eh....give us some of the evidence you base your observation on....

i did loser

i referenced ravis post

 

[bodecea]

The difference is that one group came without weapons of any sort and were willing to be arrested and face consequences of legal action and the other group came to protest armed with semi-automatic rifles and handguns threatening violence if law enforcement tried to arrest them. Do you not comprehend the difference?

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

So based on evidence that the left always destroys private and public property and so far none on the right is not evidence?

Lol....where did you get THAT sweeping statement from? ..lolol

 

[Camp]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

well the way it sits these days

if it is the governments property it certainly is not yours

Yes it is, it is the property held in trust for all citizens and future citizens. The government by virtue of elected officials in Congress and the White House have been tasked with managing it. If we don't like the way it is managed we have constitutional provisions that allow us to change how it is managed. Hence, it is our property, including mine as a citizen. I have just as much say in what is done with the land and Bundy. Nothing gives Bundy or any militia member more power and authority than any other single individual citizen. Except the fact that he temporarily has an advantage because he is armed and threatens violence.

sure what ever

try using it for your own purposes some time

Citizens use their property all the time. The terrorist at Malheur are currently living in the Visitor Center and taken over that complex of buildings. Why do you suppose they have a visitor center at the wildlife refuge? Could it be to serve the citizens who come there to use the property for their own purposes?

 

[bodecea]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

no

simply an observation based on libtard postings

An observation, eh....give us some of the evidence you base your observation on....

i did loser

i referenced ravis post

That observation of yours has nothing in the way of evidence to back it up. Why did you lie?

 

[peach174]

And one tore up government property and the other has not.
Do you comprehend the difference?

How do we know they haven't torn up government property? Have you been in there to see?

What evidence is there for any of the right wing protests that have destroyed property?
That's right none.
The left do it consistently.

No, but to say they have not with no evidence that way is just as wrong. Don't you think we should wait to see if that is true or not? Or are you basing everything on an assumption?

So based on evidence that the left always destroys private and public property and so far none on the right is not evidence?

Lol....where did you get THAT sweeping statement from? ..lolol

It's called evidence.

 

[jon_berzerk]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

was that supposed to be profound?

no

simply an observation based on libtard postings

An observation, eh....give us some of the evidence you base your observation on....

i did loser

i referenced ravis post

That observation of yours has nothing in the way of evidence to back it up. Why did you lie?

the evidence is the ravi post

how about this

i know you lost this one

you know you lost this one

i will give you the last post

because i dont really give a damn

 

[bodecea]

ravi demonstrates

that libtards can not imagine life without the help of the government

--LOL

It is Bundy and his group that are demanding help from the government and taxpayers. They want the real estate that has been the people's property for hundreds of years and the property that has been purchased with taxpayer funds.

well the way it sits these days

if it is the governments property it certainly is not yours

Yes it is, it is the property held in trust for all citizens and future citizens. The government by virtue of elected officials in Congress and the White House have been tasked with managing it. If we don't like the way it is managed we have constitutional provisions that allow us to change how it is managed. Hence, it is our property, including mine as a citizen. I have just as much say in what is done with the land and Bundy. Nothing gives Bundy or any militia member more power and authority than any other single individual citizen. Except the fact that he temporarily has an advantage because he is armed and threatens violence.

sure what ever

try using it for your own purposes some time

Citizens use their property all the time. The terrorist at Malheur are currently living in the Visitor Center and taken over that complex of buildings. Why do you suppose they have a visitor center at the wildlife refuge? Could it be to serve the citizens who come there to use the property for their own purposes?

They just don't seem to get that, do they?