Should have not waited over two years, then....right?The country needs speedy justice.
It has a right to know as soon as possible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should have not waited over two years, then....right?The country needs speedy justice.
It has a right to know as soon as possible.
The Georgia Special Grand jury sat for 8 months.Should have not waited over two years, then....right?
I agree 100%. The Dem majority should have gotten off the ground by March 2021. No excuse.Should have not waited over two years, then....right?
Trump should have a dick up his ass by spring!Let’s all pretend Trump committed crimes.
If Trump is guilty as can be is it better to hold the trial before November 6, 2024 or after November 6, 2024?
We are a country that values justice. We are also a country that values democracy. I think it would be a fine balance if we could hold the trials between November 6, 2024 and January 20, 2025. What do you guys think. This allows the public to trust the democratic process and their trust in the justice system.
I think Trump supporters fail to entertain the possibility that Trump possibly did commit crimes. I think the Trump haters fail to see how politically motivated this looks. I wish we had real judges. They’ll be the ones to dirty things by injecting their political preferences. The solution just seems so easy to me. Appease all sides and protect the dignity of America.
Ummmmmmmmmmmm, they are gaining, not in decline. In fact, the latest poll shows Trump beating Biden.Based on the most solid evidence.
Tough to be MAGA on the decline.
I thought you guys were against categorizing people based on their appearance.I thought you guys liked 3rd grade school yard taunts. He weighs 300 pounds. He’s a blob.
When you trade on it.I thought you guys were against categorizing people based on their appearance.
You are a hypocrite.
but where's the part that says the sitting president can't ask for ballots to be counted?I really don't.
Elections are administered by STATES, under the laws of STATES.
Presidential elections occur quadrennially in years evenly divisible by 4, regardless of whether or not said year is a leap year, with registered voters casting their ballots on Election Day, which since 1845 has been the first Tuesday after November 1.[8][9][10] This date coincides with the general elections of various other federal, state, and local races; since local governments are responsible for managing elections, these races typically all appear on one ballot
United States presidential election - Wikipedia
Nod
Thank me
I already posted the immunity clause. Need to see it again?It's your comments that mean nothing at all. He does not have immunity now, and the immunity is not retroactive.
Free speech does cover criminal conversation.
He is going to be convicted.
He has no authority to do so.but where's the part that says the sitting president can't ask for ballots to be counted?
There were five states that requested to have their ballots back for reconsideration, Trump agreed with them.He has no authority to do so.
He can only accept the certification, or challenge in court.
What?There were five states that requested to have their ballots back for reconsideration, Trump agreed with them.
Wait for the trial when the evidence is presented. Of course, the msm would never print that.What?
You talking about Biden? You should be.The country deserves to know if a presidential candidate is guilty before they vote.
That's not gonna cut it...Wait for the trial when the evidence is presented. Of course, the msm would never print that.
Nor would the grand jury here that...so just stay tuned.
whoever said he had authority? He can ask someone to see who does? Or again, are you suggesting his rights of speech aren't his? You still haven't posted a link to back your lie yet. hmmmmmmmmm you do like to lie.He has no authority to do so.
He can only accept the certification, or challenge in court.
Get the indictments and lets roll.You talking about Biden? You should be.
who cares, the issue is whether or not a law was broken and you haven't cited a law yet.That's not gonna cut it...
It defies logic..
Why would a state challenge its own certification?
need to impeach him, and what a fking waste of time. neither party will ever vote against their own, so that's a useless endeavor, we have to wait until he's out of office. BTW, he doesn't get immunity because the crimes would have been committed while he wasn't president.Get the indictments and lets roll.
I've made my point; provided your evidence.whoever said he had authority? He can ask someone to see who does? Or again, are you suggesting his rights of speech aren't his? You still haven't posted a link to back your lie yet. hmmmmmmmmm you do like to lie.