Background checks

The son of a bitch was buying multiple assault weapons and converting them into fully automatic weapons with the bump stocks. The number of guns, and the bump stocks should have been a red flag for someone to have a talk with him. But, of course, someone like you might have missed some profit had he been pulled in and interrogated.
 
The son of a bitch was buying multiple assault weapons and converting them into fully automatic weapons with the bump stocks. The number of guns, and the bump stocks should have been a red flag for someone to have a talk with him. But, of course, someone like you might have missed some profit had he been pulled in and interrogated.
So if someone talks too much, should we start watching them as well? :cuckoo:
 
The son of a bitch was buying multiple assault weapons and converting them into fully automatic weapons with the bump stocks. The number of guns, and the bump stocks should have been a red flag for someone to have a talk with him. But, of course, someone like you might have missed some profit had he been pulled in and interrogated.

So you want a system put in place to inform the government every time a person exercises one of their inalienable rights.
 
The son of a bitch was buying multiple assault weapons and converting them into fully automatic weapons with the bump stocks. The number of guns, and the bump stocks should have been a red flag for someone to have a talk with him. But, of course, someone like you might have missed some profit had he been pulled in and interrogated.

No, he was buying and then reselling.
He had an FFL.
He was a licensed dealer.
And bump stocks do not make a firearm full auto.
They just make it so that if you let go of the gun a little, and let it recoil and bounce around, you can get off some bursts.
It is unreliable, uncontrollable, and requires a lot of practice to even get off any batch of shots.

There were no red flags at all.
There was nothing to be suspicious about at all.
He was wealthy, stable, and had nothing to complain about.
That is why one has to suspect he was actually murdered and robbed, and the shooting was to cover it up.
 
Background checks can never stop any crime at all because it only adds a slight penalty for buying the gun illegally, when the person's intent is to violate the strongest penalties we already have.
The War on Drugs has forced all drug dealers to be armed, so clearly there is no way to prevent illegal arms transactions.

The actual purpose of background checks has to really to be create a registry of what guns honest people have, so then can be more easily targeted and confiscated.
 

Forum List

Back
Top