Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are tired of projecting a wing of the Republican's as the Party of Stupid.The guy doesn't speak like a polished politician. So what. I find plenty to disagree with in his positions rather than in the way he presents them. I consider swipes about the way things were worded - when the meaning is perfectly clear to me - to be cheap shops.
My big question is why is Fox News (the source of the story) taking cheap swipes at Carson? They are the communications wing of the GOP - so apparently some pretty big muckety mucks in the GOP are trying to throw Carson under the bus.
Why?
yeah, it might not be as bad as this guy makes it out to be. that 's if your mind isn't burdened and bound by any bias.Arent there already 3 other threads on this?
Libs are stupid. They simply dont understand what Carson wrote. I'm not a fan of the Carson For President movement. But at least read what he actually said.
its not about what Carson said...it's about avoiding what Obabble babbles.
Fuck Fox News...I'm talking about what LIBTARDS choose to postits not about what Carson said...it's about avoiding what Obabble babbles.
So how come Fox News is avoiding what "Obabble babbles" ?
Fuck Fox News...I'm talking about what LIBTARDS choose to postits not about what Carson said...it's about avoiding what Obabble babbles.
So how come Fox News is avoiding what "Obabble babbles" ?
How does it violate our first amendment rights?I never said it was.
I never implied it was.
Freedom of speech is for all Americans but PC is violating all of our 1st amendment rights.
See the link in post #120.
Who is pretending this?
Well Peaches WAS
But I think he/she is coming off that stance a bit
No I wasn't.
It seems to have gone over some heads about the explanation of our basic principals and values.
Why is it that the right can see and understand it but the left are not able to?
Ben Carson understands it and sees it quite well.
I just wonder why so many folks can't resist the temptation to blame absolutely everything on the "other side"
But yes, you WERE saying that political correctness is a threat to our First Amendment Rights when it clearly is NOT a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is a legal issue - political correctness is NOT a legal issue because no one is getting into any legal trouble for "violating" political correctness.
It is about our 1st amendment rights.
People are being taken to court over being offended.
There is no rights to not be offended.
Peaches, you are just all over the place.
First you said political correctness is threatening our First Amendment rights
Then you said it wasn't
Now you say it is again.
In the United States of American, you can sue someone for ANYTHING.
Doesn't mean you can win - but you can take 'em to court and try.
I really don't want to sound mean - but what you've posted here today shows absolutely NO understanding of what the First Amendment is and what it is supposed to protect. Maybe that's why you mostly just cut and paste that Collierville blogger (who seems to be equally challenged) and then talk about things going "over" other people's heads.
Trust me, you haven't come close to posting anything (no matter how many times you repeat the same paste over and over) that goes over my head.
I understand your posts COMPLETELY and I understand how COMPLETELY wrong you are.
If your vision of the First Amendment was ever enforced it would absolutely destroy free speech in America. I'm sorry that you can't follow that - but the fact that you don't follow, doesn't change the facts.
I hope I haven't been offensive - but your posts are just so ill-informed I can't pretend they are credible just to be polite. I wish you the very best.
Rut-roh! Fox news already going after Ben Carson... guess someone upstairs doesn't like him so much....
Presidential prospect Ben Carson makes questionable comparison Fox News
Republican presidential hopeful Ben Carson compared the Islamic State terrorist group to American patriots willing to die for freedom.
Carson praised Americans who are willing to die for their beliefs at the Republican National Committee's winter meeting outside San Diego Thursday.
Carson then mentions ISIS.
"They got the wrong philosophy, but they're willing to die for what they believe, while we are busily giving away every belief and every value for the sake of political correctness," he said as Republican officials from across the country interrupted him with applause. "We have to change that."
Commonly known as ISIS, the Islamic State group has been responsible for hundreds of deaths across the Middle East in recent months. Islamic State militants claimed responsibility for recent beheadings of Western journalists and aid workers. One of the suspects in the recent Paris terror attacks claimed allegiance to the Islamic State group.
Carson defended his comments saying it is "ridiculous" to say he was comparing American patriots to the Islamic State.
So, who told FOX to pull the plug on Carson?
Questionable comparison..........hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Let's see King George was tyrannizing the colonists and then they chose liberty or death
The Judeo-American axis of evil has been inflicting death and injury on the Muslims and they have chosen Liberty or death.
WHY is the comparison questionable?
Americans have been subjected to federal tyranny since 1935 - yet no one challenges their authority - ISIS has .
.
When was the last time the feds led an attack on an unarmed cartoon house?
The point is that dumbasses like the OP will lie or misinterpret the truth so they can fill the board with diversions so as not to have to talk about the president's dismal record. You get three Katyushas for missing the point.Fuck Fox News...I'm talking about what LIBTARDS choose to postits not about what Carson said...it's about avoiding what Obabble babbles.
So how come Fox News is avoiding what "Obabble babbles" ?
Just can't discuss anything except "stupid libtards"?
but the post STILL doesn't make much sense. What point are you trying to make?
Rut-roh! Fox news already going after Ben Carson... guess someone upstairs doesn't like him so much....
Presidential prospect Ben Carson makes questionable comparison Fox News
Republican presidential hopeful Ben Carson compared the Islamic State terrorist group to American patriots willing to die for freedom.
Carson praised Americans who are willing to die for their beliefs at the Republican National Committee's winter meeting outside San Diego Thursday.
Carson then mentions ISIS.
"They got the wrong philosophy, but they're willing to die for what they believe, while we are busily giving away every belief and every value for the sake of political correctness," he said as Republican officials from across the country interrupted him with applause. "We have to change that."
Commonly known as ISIS, the Islamic State group has been responsible for hundreds of deaths across the Middle East in recent months. Islamic State militants claimed responsibility for recent beheadings of Western journalists and aid workers. One of the suspects in the recent Paris terror attacks claimed allegiance to the Islamic State group.
Carson defended his comments saying it is "ridiculous" to say he was comparing American patriots to the Islamic State.
So, who told FOX to pull the plug on Carson?
Questionable comparison..........hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Let's see King George was tyrannizing the colonists and then they chose liberty or death
The Judeo-American axis of evil has been inflicting death and injury on the Muslims and they have chosen Liberty or death.
WHY is the comparison questionable?
Americans have been subjected to federal tyranny since 1935 - yet no one challenges their authority - ISIS has .
.
When was the last time the feds led an attack on an unarmed cartoon house?
HUH?
Isn't it a fact that the US slaughtered over 1,000,000 children during the 18 year invasion of Iraq? Didn't Madeline Albright admitted to CBS 60 minutes that the carnage was worthy?
Didn't Israel slaughtered women and children in Southern Lebanon? Hasn't the Jewish State slaughtered millions of Palestinian Arabs since it invaded Palestine in 1925?
.
How does it violate our first amendment rights?
See the link in post #120.
Well Peaches WAS
But I think he/she is coming off that stance a bit
No I wasn't.
It seems to have gone over some heads about the explanation of our basic principals and values.
Why is it that the right can see and understand it but the left are not able to?
Ben Carson understands it and sees it quite well.
I just wonder why so many folks can't resist the temptation to blame absolutely everything on the "other side"
But yes, you WERE saying that political correctness is a threat to our First Amendment Rights when it clearly is NOT a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is a legal issue - political correctness is NOT a legal issue because no one is getting into any legal trouble for "violating" political correctness.
It is about our 1st amendment rights.
People are being taken to court over being offended.
There is no rights to not be offended.
Peaches, you are just all over the place.
First you said political correctness is threatening our First Amendment rights
Then you said it wasn't
Now you say it is again.
In the United States of American, you can sue someone for ANYTHING.
Doesn't mean you can win - but you can take 'em to court and try.
I really don't want to sound mean - but what you've posted here today shows absolutely NO understanding of what the First Amendment is and what it is supposed to protect. Maybe that's why you mostly just cut and paste that Collierville blogger (who seems to be equally challenged) and then talk about things going "over" other people's heads.
Trust me, you haven't come close to posting anything (no matter how many times you repeat the same paste over and over) that goes over my head.
I understand your posts COMPLETELY and I understand how COMPLETELY wrong you are.
If your vision of the First Amendment was ever enforced it would absolutely destroy free speech in America. I'm sorry that you can't follow that - but the fact that you don't follow, doesn't change the facts.
I hope I haven't been offensive - but your posts are just so ill-informed I can't pretend they are credible just to be polite. I wish you the very best.
I can say the same with many here on the left on the board about being ill-informed.
Where did I say it wasn't about our 1st amendment?
I have been consistent with it being about our 1st amendment and our principals and values.
What vision have I given? Freedom of speech.
Many of you are the ones not understanding what it means.
You are accusing me of the very thing that PC promotes.
You are all over me about this, but at least half the nation understands it and agrees with what I and Ben Carson are saying.
The point is that dumbasses like the OP will lie or misinterpret the truth so they can fill the board with diversions so as not to have to talk about the president's dismal record. You get three Katyushas for missing the point.Fuck Fox News...I'm talking about what LIBTARDS choose to postits not about what Carson said...it's about avoiding what Obabble babbles.
So how come Fox News is avoiding what "Obabble babbles" ?
Just can't discuss anything except "stupid libtards"?
but the post STILL doesn't make much sense. What point are you trying to make?
Who is being taken to court over being offended?How does it violate our first amendment rights?I never said it was.
I never implied it was.
Freedom of speech is for all Americans but PC is violating all of our 1st amendment rights.
See the link in post #120.
Who is pretending this?
Well Peaches WAS
But I think he/she is coming off that stance a bit
No I wasn't.
It seems to have gone over some heads about the explanation of our basic principals and values.
Why is it that the right can see and understand it but the left are not able to?
Ben Carson understands it and sees it quite well.
I just wonder why so many folks can't resist the temptation to blame absolutely everything on the "other side"
But yes, you WERE saying that political correctness is a threat to our First Amendment Rights when it clearly is NOT a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is a legal issue - political correctness is NOT a legal issue because no one is getting into any legal trouble for "violating" political correctness.
It is about our 1st amendment rights.
People are being taken to court over being offended.
There is no rights to not be offended.
He can say whatever he wants and we are equally entitled to call him out for his bullshit. Not sure what point you are attempting to make."we are busily giving away every belief and every value for the sake of political correctness"Pretending that PCism has something to do with free speech or the destruction of society is questionable and retarded.So, he is feeding red meat to a very red-meat addicted base. What is wrong with that? I personally can live with that. For those things are still inconsequential to the fact that nothing he said is questionable or controversial.
Who is pretending this?
^total BS
But it's his right to say as much BS as he wants and certainly that is not controversial.
Who is being taken to court over being offended?How does it violate our first amendment rights?
See the link in post #120.
Well Peaches WAS
But I think he/she is coming off that stance a bit
No I wasn't.
It seems to have gone over some heads about the explanation of our basic principals and values.
Why is it that the right can see and understand it but the left are not able to?
Ben Carson understands it and sees it quite well.
I just wonder why so many folks can't resist the temptation to blame absolutely everything on the "other side"
But yes, you WERE saying that political correctness is a threat to our First Amendment Rights when it clearly is NOT a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is a legal issue - political correctness is NOT a legal issue because no one is getting into any legal trouble for "violating" political correctness.
It is about our 1st amendment rights.
People are being taken to court over being offended.
There is no rights to not be offended.
The Missouri State Fair has permanently banned a rodeo clown from performing just because he wore a Obama mask, and now all of the other rodeo clowns are being required to take sensitivity training.
The state commission went further, saying it will require that before the Rodeo Cowboy Association can take part in any future state fair, “they must provide evidence to the director of the Missouri State Fair that they have proof that all officials and subcontractors of the MRCA have successfully participated in sensitivity training.”
There are a whole bunch of political incorrect court cases
Who is being taken to court over being offended?How does it violate our first amendment rights?
See the link in post #120.
Well Peaches WAS
But I think he/she is coming off that stance a bit
No I wasn't.
It seems to have gone over some heads about the explanation of our basic principals and values.
Why is it that the right can see and understand it but the left are not able to?
Ben Carson understands it and sees it quite well.
I just wonder why so many folks can't resist the temptation to blame absolutely everything on the "other side"
But yes, you WERE saying that political correctness is a threat to our First Amendment Rights when it clearly is NOT a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment is a legal issue - political correctness is NOT a legal issue because no one is getting into any legal trouble for "violating" political correctness.
It is about our 1st amendment rights.
People are being taken to court over being offended.
There is no rights to not be offended.
The Missouri State Fair has permanently banned a rodeo clown from performing just because he wore a Obama mask, and now all of the other rodeo clowns are being required to take sensitivity training.
The state commission went further, saying it will require that before the Rodeo Cowboy Association can take part in any future state fair, “they must provide evidence to the director of the Missouri State Fair that they have proof that all officials and subcontractors of the MRCA have successfully participated in sensitivity training.”
There are a whole bunch of political incorrect court cases
Peaches,
Even YOU can't keep up with what you've posted.
Yes, you could say many on the left are ill-informed. And you'd be right. But no matter HOW ill-informed other people are - that doesn't make YOU any better informed.
The vision you have given is that people who agree with you should be able to say whatever they want and if anyone disagrees with them they are violating the First Amendment if they say so.
And no - you are in a very small minority of people who want to dismantle the first amendment.
Thank God.
Peaches,
Even YOU can't keep up with what you've posted.
Yes, you could say many on the left are ill-informed. And you'd be right. But no matter HOW ill-informed other people are - that doesn't make YOU any better informed.
The vision you have given is that people who agree with you should be able to say whatever they want and if anyone disagrees with them they are violating the First Amendment if they say so.
And no - you are in a very small minority of people who want to dismantle the first amendment.
Thank God.
That is the total opposite of what I said.
That is what I said about what Political Correctness does.
I do not want to dismantle the 1st amendment.
People like me want to save the 1st amendment.
I do not want a George Orwell political correctness where society describes a set of acceptable beliefs, outside of which no one is not permitted to step.
No dissident thinkers need apply.
