Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched

[bripat9643]

This should get all the turds in here to start foaming at the mouth:

On October 27th, 2012, only days before the presidential election, I wrote:

If Barack Obama is reelected, will he face impeachment over Benghazi — a yet more unpleasant and far more wrenching result than to lose an election?

It could happen — and in my estimation should happen — the way revelations are playing out over the bloody terror attack that took four American lives and has led to weeks of prevarication and obfuscation.

The scandal thus far has at least tarnished and quite possibly implicated everyone from the CIA director, to the secretaries of State and Defense, to the UN ambassador and, of course, the president himself — with no end in sight, because Obama, normally loath to expose himself and even less so in an election season, refuses to answer questions on the subject.

It’s not the crime, but the cover-up, we learned in an earlier impeachment, only in this case the crime may be just as bad or worse.”

Roger L. Simon » Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched

 

[TheOldSchool]

Wanna put a bet on it?

 

[Wolfsister77]

Um yeah, It's still far fetched.

 

[konradv]

No crime. No cover-up. It's amazing how little history some people know, that they'd actually think this compares to Watergate in any way.

 

[bitterlyclingin]

Spreadsheet timeline of the cover up at the link. Senates in Democratic hands so Harry Reid will do any and everything to avoid scrutinizing this empty suit's High Crimes and Misdeameanors. His supporters certainly don't want to see him go. As long as he's in office there's always the chance he'll pull off another 'Pigford', Black, Hispanic, or Female, come claim your loot and booty, no proof or documentation necessary, There's a saying that "Democracies are only viable until the electorate figures out they can vote themselves the contents of the nation's treasury". Thats definitely what's going on today in Obama's Great Pandering.
He's in Mexico today telling the Mexicans that America is responsible for everything that's wrong with Mexico.
Actually, the more you think about it, "Empty Suit' is actually a compliment for this cucksocker.

Blog: The Complete Benghazi Timeline in Spreadsheet Format

 

[LoneLaugher]

Bet your putrid USMB life on it?

 

[foxyladi]

Then we would get Biden.

 

[rightwinger]

Hey......Republicans impeached over a blowjob, they could impeach over this

 

[candycorn]

Bring it on.

 

[velvtacheeze]

This should get all the turds in here to start foaming at the mouth:

On October 27th, 2012, only days before the presidential election, I wrote:

If Barack Obama is reelected, will he face impeachment over Benghazi — a yet more unpleasant and far more wrenching result than to lose an election?

It could happen — and in my estimation should happen — the way revelations are playing out over the bloody terror attack that took four American lives and has led to weeks of prevarication and obfuscation.

The scandal thus far has at least tarnished and quite possibly implicated everyone from the CIA director, to the secretaries of State and Defense, to the UN ambassador and, of course, the president himself — with no end in sight, because Obama, normally loath to expose himself and even less so in an election season, refuses to answer questions on the subject.

It’s not the crime, but the cover-up, we learned in an earlier impeachment, only in this case the crime may be just as bad or worse.”

Roger L. Simon » Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched

The GOP is filled with enough lunatics to make it not so far-fetched.

But the GOP will never fill the Senate with enough Senators, so the idea is silly and just more right wing daydreaming. What a bunch of losers.

 

[PredFan]

This should get all the turds in here to start foaming at the mouth:

On October 27th, 2012, only days before the presidential election, I wrote:

If Barack Obama is reelected, will he face impeachment over Benghazi — a yet more unpleasant and far more wrenching result than to lose an election?

It could happen — and in my estimation should happen — the way revelations are playing out over the bloody terror attack that took four American lives and has led to weeks of prevarication and obfuscation.

The scandal thus far has at least tarnished and quite possibly implicated everyone from the CIA director, to the secretaries of State and Defense, to the UN ambassador and, of course, the president himself — with no end in sight, because Obama, normally loath to expose himself and even less so in an election season, refuses to answer questions on the subject.

It’s not the crime, but the cover-up, we learned in an earlier impeachment, only in this case the crime may be just as bad or worse.”

Roger L. Simon » Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched

From your keyboard to God's ears my friend.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Bring it on.

Which of these did the Bush administration blame on anything but Islamic terror ?

How many were refused military aid and intervention ?

Answers = None. None.

 

[PredFan]

Jeez you libtards have so much trouble with reading comprehension. Probably explains why you are liberals.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

> Nutball impeachment movement gains steam - news of the day

One envisions that steam passing through the nutball digestive tract to produce quite the, uh, steaming, movement.

With memories like these, what can go wrong?

 

[PredFan]

Bring it on.

Which of these did the Bush administration blame on anything but Islamic terror ?

How many were refused military aid and intervention ?

Answers = None. None.

He won't answer. he posted that nonsense in another thread, was challenged in much the same way, and has run off.

 

[rightwinger]

Bring it on.

Which of these did the Bush administration blame on anything but Islamic terror ?

How many were refused military aid and intervention ?

Answers = None. None.

Oh....I get it now

Obamas four deaths in Benghazi were PREVENTABLE

Bush's 60 consulate deaths and 3000 9-11 deaths were just freak accidents

 

[OODA_Loop]

Bring it on.

Which of these did the Bush administration blame on anything but Islamic terror ?

How many were refused military aid and intervention ?

Answers = None. None.

Oh....I get it now

Obamas four deaths in Benghazi were PREVENTABLE

Bush's 60 consulate deaths and 3000 9-11 deaths were just freak accidents

Nope.

Obama lied about Benghazi.

We don't leave service folks to die at the hands of our enemies. We do everything we can to protect them.

 

[OriginalShroom]

While I would agree that if additional facts were to be brought to light that Obama failed to do everything in his power to protect those 4 lives and that he was culpable for their deaths, that he should be impeached for it, it won't happen.

It simply will not happen.

Not unless there are enough Democrats and Liberals in the press to be offended by it to make it an issue.

The Republicans will not, can not, do it on their own. They will want and actually need Democrats to be leading the charge on it. The media and the Democrats has managed to twist Clinton's impeachment to being about sex rather than what the charges actually were, lying under oath so successfully that has tarnished the Republicans for the next hundred years on bringing Impeachment charges against anyone except another Republican.

Democrat will not do it. That simply will not happen.

They will not be seen as the party to not only impeach one otheir own, but the "First Black President". Not only that but it will bring down their hopes for 2016, Hillary Clinton.

Then there is the fact that Democrats do not have the moral fiber to say that one of their own has done wrong and needs to be removed from office. Charlie Rangle and "Icebox" William Jefferson are proof of that.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

Bring it on.

Great post. There will likely be nutball claims Bush sent help.

Even if that were true, which of course if he did it wasn't enough, guess what? Results were similar or the same.

Except for "outraged" nutball scum. None of that when one of their own kills thousands of Americans chasing neocon unicorns in third world hellholes.

 

[konradv]

Bring it on.

Which of these did the Bush administration blame on anything but Islamic terror ?

How many were refused military aid and intervention ?

Answers = None. None.

He won't answer. he posted that nonsense in another thread, was challenged in much the same way, and has run off.

Where's the impeachable offense? Saying you thought it was one reason when it really was something else, just isn't one.