Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate

Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

True, it’s merely a partisan fishing expedition.

And since Watergate administrations have followed the policy of complete presidential isolation, Nixon was forced to resign because he personally authorized the hush fund pay-outs to lower level conspirators, this evidence left him open to obstruction of justice charges and initial impeachment proceedings.

You do know the right wing will never listen to this? If they did their bubbles would burst

Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

Marginally more lucid partisan hacks on the right know that Obama won’t be impeached but hope to somehow damage the president’s legacy.

Conservatives, for the most part, are not interested in the ‘truth’ concerning Benghazi, nor the families of those killed, they seek only to contrive a controversy where none exists.
 
How many people died because of the WMD argument?

How man people died when the US Marines barracks were bombed in Lebanon and Reagan cut and run without going after those responsible?

How many people die because 2nd amendment extremists fight sensible and rational gun regulations?

Do right wingers really care about people dying, or do they care most about having lost a 4 year battle to make President Obama a one term President?

dont try to defuse your op. it was way bigger then watergate. we just got dumb down over the years and dont care enough to be outraged.

Your post is so :cuckoo: because all it does is repeat unfounded and conspiratorial accusations.


:thewave:


thank you for helping to make Dante's case:cool:

No it doesnt you act like it happened 4 years ago. It just happend last year. I do listen to the radio and read newspapers, ya know? right away it was reported it happen over a FUCKING stupid movie. When Obama called the marines they answered and went and killed Osama and when the marines called Obama for help he didnt even bother to pick up the phone.
 
The Watergate scandal resulted in 69 government officials being charged and 48 being found guilty. The principals were:[57]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States, convicted of perjury. Served 19 months of a one- to four-year sentence. [58]

On June 19, 1972, it was publicly revealed that one of the Watergate burglars was a Republican Party security aide.[11] Former Attorney General John Mitchell, who at the time was the head of the Nixon re-election campaign (CRP), denied any involvement with the Watergate break-in or knowledge of the five burglars.

---------------

Richard Kleindienst, Attorney General, convicted of "refusing to answer questions" given one month in jail.[59]

Jeb Stuart Magruder, Head of Committee to Re-elect the President, pled guilty to 1 count of conspiracy, August 1973[60]

Frederick C. LaRue, Advisor to John Mitchell, convicted of obstruction of justice.[60]

H. R. Haldeman, Chief of Staff for Nixon, convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury.[61]

John Ehrlichman, Counsel to Nixon, convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury.[62]

Egil Krogh, aide to John Ehrlichman, sentenced to six months.[60]

John W. Dean III, counsel to Nixon, convicted of obstruction of justice.[60]

Dwight L. Chapin, deputy assistant to Nixon, convicted of perjury.[60]

Herbert W. Kalmbach, personal attorney to Nixon, convicted of illegal campaigning.[60]

Charles W. Colson, special counsel to Nixon, convicted of obstruction of justice.[59]

Herbert L. Porter, aide to the Committee to Re-elect the President. Convicted of perjury.[60]

G. Gordon Liddy, Special Investigations Group, convicted of burglary.[60]

E. Howard Hunt, Security consultant, convicted of burglary.[60]

James W. McCord Jr., convicted of six charges of burglary, conspiracy and wiretapping.[60]
Virgilio Gonzalez, convicted of burglary.[60]

Bernard Barker, convicted of burglary.[60]

Eugenio Martinez, convicted of burglary.[60]

Frank Sturgis, convicted of burglary.[60]


How many American deaths were there due to Watergate?? :confused: :eusa_whistle:
 
Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

We know that won't happen because the media is covering for him. whenever incriminating evidence comes to light, the media responds with the dear-in-the-headlights expression. Nothing will be exposed because the media isn't interested in exposing it. But it will attack FOX News anytime it publishes facts.
 
True, it’s merely a partisan fishing expedition.

And since Watergate administrations have followed the policy of complete presidential isolation, Nixon was forced to resign because he personally authorized the hush fund pay-outs to lower level conspirators, this evidence left him open to obstruction of justice charges and initial impeachment proceedings.

You do know the right wing will never listen to this? If they did their bubbles would burst

Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

Marginally more lucid partisan hacks on the right know that Obama won’t be impeached but hope to somehow damage the president’s legacy.

Conservatives, for the most part, are not interested in the ‘truth’ concerning Benghazi, nor the families of those killed, they seek only to contrive a controversy where none exists.


The asshole liberals tried to convince America that Booooosh needed to be impeached.

But that was nothing to moron mindless hacks like Adam_Clayton.

The President himself is assuring all the damage to his legacy, you fucking twit.

And for the most part, it is the Conservatives, and only the conservatives, who seek the truth.

What you asshole liberals want is to cover up the controversy that does already exist.

Hey, just to remind you, you puke, people DIED over there. I suppose a moron like you AGREES with Shrillary Clinton who shrieked, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

-- Clinton takes on critics over Benghazi at tense Hill hearings | Fox News

It does matter, you fucking asshole.
 
True, it’s merely a partisan fishing expedition.

And since Watergate administrations have followed the policy of complete presidential isolation, Nixon was forced to resign because he personally authorized the hush fund pay-outs to lower level conspirators, this evidence left him open to obstruction of justice charges and initial impeachment proceedings.

You do know the right wing will never listen to this? If they did their bubbles would burst

Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

Marginally more lucid partisan hacks on the right know that Obama won’t be impeached but hope to somehow damage the president’s legacy.

Conservatives, for the most part, are not interested in the ‘truth’ concerning Benghazi, nor the families of those killed, they seek only to contrive a controversy where none exists.

Lmao..... We dont have to try to damage Obama he does it to himself, the left wing is stuck so far up his ass that they can not even see Obama care is going to cost them big time. Just how they got that little surprise on their paychecks in January. When he promised them no tax hikes on the lower class. And with the gun control thing your right. my right wing friends are just being idiots.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.


My, how weak. When the machine of government is used to decieve the American people, it's much, much more important than Watergate. That's exactly what happened, isn't it?

The Obama administration purposely decieved the American public for political gain.

How can that be ignored?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

You are wrong, again, Dainty.

Coverups are indeed akin to coverups, you idiot.

Coverup?

Watergate coverup was about and consisted of a criminal enterprise being run out of both the White House and CREEP (Nixon Reeletion committee).

Benghazi? :eusa_whistle:
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

You are wrong, again, Dainty.

Coverups are indeed akin to coverups, you idiot.

Coverup?

Watergate coverup was about and consisted of a criminal enterprise being run out of both the White House and CREEP (Nixon Reeletion committee).

Benghazi? :eusa_whistle:

The Watergate coverup was the orchestrated denial of what he knew by the President concerning activities of his operatives in CReEP.

Behghazi appears to be (or at least could be) the orchestrated coverup by the President and Shrillary of what they fucking DIDN'T do but should have done or at least attempted.

:eusa_whistle:
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

You are wrong, again, Dainty.

Coverups are indeed akin to coverups, you idiot.

Coverup?

Watergate coverup was about and consisted of a criminal enterprise being run out of both the White House and CREEP (Nixon Reeletion committee).

Benghazi? :eusa_whistle:

you really dont know what the media was like in the 70's compared to today do ya? If this happend in the 70's obama would have had to leave like Nixion did.
 
again:
How many people died because of the WMD argument?

How man people died when the US Marines barracks were bombed in Lebanon and Reagan cut and run without going after those responsible?

How many people die because 2nd amendment extremists fight sensible and rational gun regulations?

Do right wingers really care about people dying, or do they care most about having lost a 4 year battle to make President Obama a one term President?

Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.


Using grieving parents as props is not the same thing as deceiving the American public on matters of national security.

Try to get a little perspective.
 
True, it’s merely a partisan fishing expedition.

And since Watergate administrations have followed the policy of complete presidential isolation, Nixon was forced to resign because he personally authorized the hush fund pay-outs to lower level conspirators, this evidence left him open to obstruction of justice charges and initial impeachment proceedings.

You do know the right wing will never listen to this? If they did their bubbles would burst

Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

Marginally more lucid partisan hacks on the right know that Obama won’t be impeached but hope to somehow damage the president’s legacy.

Conservatives, for the most part, are not interested in the ‘truth’ concerning Benghazi, nor the families of those killed, they seek only to contrive a controversy where none exists.


Taking a note from the Obama playbook? How transparent.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

No, it's much much worse.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

It's equivalent to lot's of tragedies that nobody remembers anymore because they aren't in the Two-Minutes-Hate echo chamber:

US diplomat killed in car bombing - The Boston Globe
 
You're banned but I'll answer for the education of others:

How many people died because of the WMD argument?

Conmpletely irrelevant. Saddam Hussein DID have WMDs and everyone knew it, even the democrats.

How man people died when the US Marines barracks were bombed in Lebanon and Reagan cut and run without going after those responsible?

Ignorant and irrelevant. There was no evidence that the people of Lebanon did this nor the leaders of the country, what was he supposed to do, bomb them?

How many people die because 2nd amendment extremists fight sensible and rational gun regulations?

Zero, fact.

Do right wingers really care about people dying, or do they care most about having lost a 4 year battle to make President Obama a one term President?

We care about runaway governments and corrupt politicians like obama who will cover up the deaths of Americans and lie to the American people so that they can get re-elected.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

No, it's much much worse.

and it was right before super tuesday. They covered it up all right. and Hillary and her stupid brain injury that didnt even go to a doctor untill she had to testify? what a joke.....right out of the Clinton play book.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

You are wrong, again, Dainty.

Coverups are indeed akin to coverups, you idiot.

I don't know what happened to him. He used to make sense, now he's just a first class idiot.
 
You do know the right wing will never listen to this? If they did their bubbles would burst

Some on the right adhere to the pathetic delusion that Obama will be impeached, found guilty of some ‘crime’ in the Senate, and forced to resign.

Marginally more lucid partisan hacks on the right know that Obama won’t be impeached but hope to somehow damage the president’s legacy.

Conservatives, for the most part, are not interested in the ‘truth’ concerning Benghazi, nor the families of those killed, they seek only to contrive a controversy where none exists.


The asshole liberals tried to convince America that Booooosh needed to be impeached.

But that was nothing to moron mindless hacks like Adam_Clayton.

The President himself is assuring all the damage to his legacy, you fucking twit.

And for the most part, it is the Conservatives, and only the conservatives, who seek the truth.

What you asshole liberals want is to cover up the controversy that does already exist.

Hey, just to remind you, you puke, people DIED over there. I suppose a moron like you AGREES with Shrillary Clinton who shrieked, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

-- Clinton takes on critics over Benghazi at tense Hill hearings | Fox News

It does matter, you fucking asshole.

It's ok with them if people die under a Democrat president.
 
Benghazi Is Not Equivalent To Watergate or Any-other-gate, and the right wing needs to stop insisting America swallow this bs. The right wing does not want the victims and families of victims exercising their 1st amendments rights in the gun violence debates, but they want America join in their delusions on Banghazi and any other tragedy they can take advantage of, that they think may possibly make the Obama Administration look bad.

No, it certainly isn't the equivalent of Watergate. It's far worse. 4 Americans were killed.

Needlessly too:evil:
 

Forum List

Back
Top