🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Bernie: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, or Progressive?

Now about the Democrat Party elite, Bernie Sanders: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive


5." ... Sanders helped found the Liberty Union Party, which called for the nationalization of all US banks and the public takeover of all private utility companies. [Before Maxine Waters, too!]

... Sanders in 1981 managed to get elected mayor of Burlington, Vt., where he restricted property rights for landlords, set price controls and raised property taxes to pay for communal land trusts. Local small businesses distributed fliers complaining their new mayor “does not believe in free enterprise.”


6. His radical activities didn’t stop at the water’s edge. Sanders took several “goodwill” trips not only to the USSR, but also to Cuba and Nicaragua, where the Soviets were trying to expand their influence in our hemisphere.

In 1985, he traveled to Managua to celebrate the rise to power of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista government. He called it a “heroic revolution.” Undermining anti-communist US policy, Sanders denounced the Reagan administration’s backing of the Contra rebels in a letter to the Sandinistas.

“The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” Sanders told Vermont government-access TV in 1985." Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist | New York Post


(BTW...Ortega and the Sandinistas were voted out of power in 1990. Ortega ran for election again, in October 1996 and November 2001, but lost on both occasions)




Wait...who was the dunce who said this "Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen."
 
PoliticalChic is comparing, but comparing is not the same as equating. In fact, it is a trick used to mislead. You can compare a Volkswagon to a Corvette because they both have four rubber tires, combustible engines, windshields, brakes, etc., but those comparisons do not make them equate to one another except for in the broadest terms.


Let me search your post for anything I've posted that you are able to deny.....

hmmm......

Nothing.
Not a single thing.


Your usual post, and your usual level of success.
The trick is that comparisons can be made and you can claim the comparisons are true. Volkswagen can improve it's horsepower and hence, you can claim it is trying to be like a Corvette. Your claim that Volkswagen is trying to improve horsepower may be true, but your conclusion that it is trying to be like a Corvette would be ridiculous. Hence, your cherry picking similarities from 15 varieties of socialism and comparing those similarities to communism may be factually correct when viewing one comparison to a similarity, the conclusion is just as ridiculous.
 
Socialist and Progressives. Yes, Jewish.


For clarity....your position is that the Democrat Party....the one with the same basic platform as the Communist Party....is religious....and their religion is Judaism?

Have I got that right?


I’ll say this about ya’…you’re old school insane.
 
PoliticalChic is comparing, but comparing is not the same as equating. In fact, it is a trick used to mislead. You can compare a Volkswagon to a Corvette because they both have four rubber tires, combustible engines, windshields, brakes, etc., but those comparisons do not make them equate to one another except for in the broadest terms.


Let me search your post for anything I've posted that you are able to deny.....

hmmm......

Nothing.
Not a single thing.


Your usual post, and your usual level of success.
The trick is that comparisons can be made and you can claim the comparisons are true. Volkswagen can improve it's horsepower and hence, you can claim it is trying to be like a Corvette. Your claim that Volkswagen is trying to improve horsepower may be true, but your conclusion that it is trying to be like a Corvette would be ridiculous. Hence, your cherry picking similarities from 15 varieties of socialism and comparing those similarities to communism may be factually correct when viewing one comparison to a similarity, the conclusion is just as ridiculous.


Let me search your post for anything I've posted that you are able to deny.....

hmmm......

Still nothing.
Not a single thing.


Your usual post, and your usual level of success.


But...let me give you something to mull over...."Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients..."
http://schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/1/63.full.pdf


You might want to look up some of those terms.....
And, speak to your doctor.
 
I'm always amused how deeply the truth irks and irritates the indoctrinated.

I'm always amused by someone who has posted nearly 50,000 times on the same message board for close to 8 years now and yet still doesn't know how to do anything but cut and paste.

You'd think with all that free time you have, you know since you're not actually being a productive member of society, you'd have figured out how to at least form your own opinion by this point.


Yet it still gets under your skin, huh?

Must be doing something right.

Under my skin? Hardly! Quite the opposite in fact.

This place and your posts are comedy gold. I come here to have a laugh and appreciate the fact that I'm not you.

I'm actually thinking of printing our your posts and turning them in to a book so I can read them anytime!



That must be why you're back here whining....trying so very hard to dispute my posts...but finding no substantive way to do so.

If I were to collect all of yours and the other Leftist dope's posts, I'd call the book to represent the essence of 'em....."Is Not, Is Noooottttttt!"


Really the best you can do, huh?
This is why, in the marketplace of ideas, conservatives eat your lunch.

See what you can do with my next post.

Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen.

I'm simply here to point and laugh at your posts, much like everyone else does. You're the court jester, nothing more.



Post #42 scared you off, huh?


Seems you don't like being embarrassed.
 
Bernie is the reveal.

In a good mystery, the reveal is the point in the story where the elements influencing the plot are laid out to the reader and the mystery is solved.

The democratic - socialist party, which can be termed simply "the party" has maintained a razor thin veneer of support for America, the Constitution and property rights. For the last 50 years, there have been plenty of hints that the party is not favorable at all to the concepts of individual liberty and the rights of the people to trade unmolested.

With the rise of Barack Obama, the public presentation of the party moved sharply left. Despite this, the party maintained the ruse that they were proponents of America, though the evidence was clearly against such a conclusion.

Sanders is the big reveal, he is the admission by the party that "yeah, we are Bolsheviks and want one party rule under an authoritarian state."

Note that Hilliary, rather than opposing Mao Tse Sanders, apes his every proposal.

The mask is off.

democrat-seal-of-marxists.jpg
 
Now about the Democrat Party elite, Bernie Sanders: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive


5." ... Sanders helped found the Liberty Union Party, which called for the nationalization of all US banks and the public takeover of all private utility companies. [Before Maxine Waters, too!]

... Sanders in 1981 managed to get elected mayor of Burlington, Vt., where he restricted property rights for landlords, set price controls and raised property taxes to pay for communal land trusts. Local small businesses distributed fliers complaining their new mayor “does not believe in free enterprise.”


6. His radical activities didn’t stop at the water’s edge. Sanders took several “goodwill” trips not only to the USSR, but also to Cuba and Nicaragua, where the Soviets were trying to expand their influence in our hemisphere.

In 1985, he traveled to Managua to celebrate the rise to power of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista government. He called it a “heroic revolution.” Undermining anti-communist US policy, Sanders denounced the Reagan administration’s backing of the Contra rebels in a letter to the Sandinistas.

“The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” Sanders told Vermont government-access TV in 1985." Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist | New York Post


(BTW...Ortega and the Sandinistas were voted out of power in 1990. Ortega ran for election again, in October 1996 and November 2001, but lost on both occasions)




Wait...who was the dunce who said this "Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen."
Typical attack the messenger when you can not attack the message nonsense. Your ideas are based on comparisons which you attempt to define as equating. A basic and simple method of misdirection used in marketing and propaganda.
 
Now about the Democrat Party elite, Bernie Sanders: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive


5." ... Sanders helped found the Liberty Union Party, which called for the nationalization of all US banks and the public takeover of all private utility companies. [Before Maxine Waters, too!]

... Sanders in 1981 managed to get elected mayor of Burlington, Vt., where he restricted property rights for landlords, set price controls and raised property taxes to pay for communal land trusts. Local small businesses distributed fliers complaining their new mayor “does not believe in free enterprise.”


6. His radical activities didn’t stop at the water’s edge. Sanders took several “goodwill” trips not only to the USSR, but also to Cuba and Nicaragua, where the Soviets were trying to expand their influence in our hemisphere.

In 1985, he traveled to Managua to celebrate the rise to power of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista government. He called it a “heroic revolution.” Undermining anti-communist US policy, Sanders denounced the Reagan administration’s backing of the Contra rebels in a letter to the Sandinistas.

“The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” Sanders told Vermont government-access TV in 1985." Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist | New York Post


(BTW...Ortega and the Sandinistas were voted out of power in 1990. Ortega ran for election again, in October 1996 and November 2001, but lost on both occasions)




Wait...who was the dunce who said this "Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen."
Typical attack the messenger when you can not attack the message nonsense. Your ideas are based on comparisons which you attempt to define as equating. A basic and simple method of misdirection used in marketing and propaganda.



OMG!!

The third post of yours, whining 'is not, is nooootttttt!"

And you still can't find a single, tiny, pronouncement of mine that you can deny.



With every post you verify my posts.....I should keep you on retainer.
 
Bernie is the reveal.

In a good mystery, the reveal is the point in the story where the elements influencing the plot are laid out to the reader and the mystery is solved.

The democratic - socialist party, which can be termed simply "the party" has maintained a razor thin veneer of support for America, the Constitution and property rights. For the last 50 years, there have been plenty of hints that the party is not favorable at all to the concepts of individual liberty and the rights of the people to trade unmolested.

With the rise of Barack Obama, the public presentation of the party moved sharply left. Despite this, the party maintained the ruse that they were proponents of America, though the evidence was clearly against such a conclusion.

Sanders is the big reveal, he is the admission by the party that "yeah, we are Bolsheviks and want one party rule under an authoritarian state."

Note that Hilliary, rather than opposing Mao Tse Sanders, apes his every proposal.

The mask is off.

democrat-seal-of-marxists.jpg



That's pretty much my premise.
 
Distributist


Yup...I agree.

But you didn't g
Distributist


Yup.....I agree.

1. But you didn't describe what that means in socialist/communist terms.

It means to distribute what others have earned to those who cannot or will not participate in the earning.

Only capitalism does that correctly.


2. From Dennis Prager:
  1. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.
  2. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.
  3. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.
 
Distributist


Yup...I agree.

But you didn't g
Distributist


Yup.....I agree.

1. But you didn't describe what that means in socialist/communist terms.

It means to distribute what others have earned to those who cannot or will not participate in the earning.

Only capitalism does that correctly.


2. From Dennis Prager:
  1. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.
  2. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.
  3. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.

It is a Judeo-Christian humanist concept

Distributism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Now about the Democrat Party elite, Bernie Sanders: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive


5." ... Sanders helped found the Liberty Union Party, which called for the nationalization of all US banks and the public takeover of all private utility companies. [Before Maxine Waters, too!]

... Sanders in 1981 managed to get elected mayor of Burlington, Vt., where he restricted property rights for landlords, set price controls and raised property taxes to pay for communal land trusts. Local small businesses distributed fliers complaining their new mayor “does not believe in free enterprise.”


6. His radical activities didn’t stop at the water’s edge. Sanders took several “goodwill” trips not only to the USSR, but also to Cuba and Nicaragua, where the Soviets were trying to expand their influence in our hemisphere.

In 1985, he traveled to Managua to celebrate the rise to power of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista government. He called it a “heroic revolution.” Undermining anti-communist US policy, Sanders denounced the Reagan administration’s backing of the Contra rebels in a letter to the Sandinistas.

“The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” Sanders told Vermont government-access TV in 1985." Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist | New York Post


(BTW...Ortega and the Sandinistas were voted out of power in 1990. Ortega ran for election again, in October 1996 and November 2001, but lost on both occasions)




Wait...who was the dunce who said this "Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen."
Typical attack the messenger when you can not attack the message nonsense. Your ideas are based on comparisons which you attempt to define as equating. A basic and simple method of misdirection used in marketing and propaganda.



OMG!!

The third post of yours, whining 'is not, is nooootttttt!"

And you still can't find a single, tiny, pronouncement of mine that you can deny.



With every post you verify my posts.....I should keep you on retainer.
And yet you are still in that evade answering the challenge mode and sticking to your usual insult and pat yourself on the back mode. No doubt you will go on for pages evading the answering of a challenge or refuting. You have yet to answer the comparison turned into an equating you make that distorts and misinforms about a socialist system allowing free market system when a communist system does not allow a free market system. You simple refuse to acknowledge that facts can be manipulated and distorted to bring about a dishonest conclusion.
 
Distributist


Yup...I agree.

But you didn't g
Distributist


Yup.....I agree.

1. But you didn't describe what that means in socialist/communist terms.

It means to distribute what others have earned to those who cannot or will not participate in the earning.

Only capitalism does that correctly.


2. From Dennis Prager:
  1. While the Judeo-Christian society labels actions as ‘good’ or ‘evil,’ due to morality and/or self-control, the Left sees the results as due to material inequality, i.e., violent crime due to poverty.
  2. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.
  3. The Left is less interested in creating wealth than in distributing it.

It is a Judeo-Christian humanist concept

Distributism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Funny....you Leftists hate religion....but now your trying to describe the political system as if it were a theology.


But....in that case, mull this over:

  1. The Left says of the Right, “You fools, it is demonstrable that dinosaurs lived one hundred million years ago, I can prove it to you, how can you say the earth was created in 4000BCE?” But this supposed intransigence on the part of the Religious Right is far less detrimental to the health of the body politic than the Left’s love affair with Marxism, Socialism, Racialism, the Command Economy, all of which have been proven via one hundred years of evidence shows only shortages, despotism and murder." David Mamet
 
Now about the Democrat Party elite, Bernie Sanders: Communist, Socialist, Liberal, and Progressive


5." ... Sanders helped found the Liberty Union Party, which called for the nationalization of all US banks and the public takeover of all private utility companies. [Before Maxine Waters, too!]

... Sanders in 1981 managed to get elected mayor of Burlington, Vt., where he restricted property rights for landlords, set price controls and raised property taxes to pay for communal land trusts. Local small businesses distributed fliers complaining their new mayor “does not believe in free enterprise.”


6. His radical activities didn’t stop at the water’s edge. Sanders took several “goodwill” trips not only to the USSR, but also to Cuba and Nicaragua, where the Soviets were trying to expand their influence in our hemisphere.

In 1985, he traveled to Managua to celebrate the rise to power of the Marxist-Leninist Sandinista government. He called it a “heroic revolution.” Undermining anti-communist US policy, Sanders denounced the Reagan administration’s backing of the Contra rebels in a letter to the Sandinistas.

“The Sandinista government has more support among the Nicaraguan people — substantially more support — than Ronald Reagan has among the American people,” Sanders told Vermont government-access TV in 1985." Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist | New York Post


(BTW...Ortega and the Sandinistas were voted out of power in 1990. Ortega ran for election again, in October 1996 and November 2001, but lost on both occasions)




Wait...who was the dunce who said this "Dispute your posts? You're confused. There needs to be something of substance before any dispute can happen."
Typical attack the messenger when you can not attack the message nonsense. Your ideas are based on comparisons which you attempt to define as equating. A basic and simple method of misdirection used in marketing and propaganda.



OMG!!

The third post of yours, whining 'is not, is nooootttttt!"

And you still can't find a single, tiny, pronouncement of mine that you can deny.



With every post you verify my posts.....I should keep you on retainer.
And yet you are still in that evade answering the challenge mode and sticking to your usual insult and pat yourself on the back mode. No doubt you will go on for pages evading the answering of a challenge or refuting. You have yet to answer the comparison turned into an equating you make that distorts and misinforms about a socialist system allowing free market system when a communist system does not allow a free market system. You simple refuse to acknowledge that facts can be manipulated and distorted to bring about a dishonest conclusion.



Find any quote from my posts that you'd care to dispute.



Double dog dare ya'
 

Forum List

Back
Top