Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
Of course Sanders supporters are broke they're all lining up for all the free shit he's promising
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Wrong.He's only 2 percentage points behind Trump, with the millionaire class
View attachment 60134
The new GOP favorite of the rich: CNBC survey
Wow, look at that. hillary, supposedly the warrior of the middle class, is THE favorite candidate of the one percenters. Who knew?
The rich like free trade and immigrant labor, apparently![]()
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.Wrong.He's only 2 percentage points behind Trump, with the millionaire class
View attachment 60134
The new GOP favorite of the rich: CNBC survey
Wow, look at that. hillary, supposedly the warrior of the middle class, is THE favorite candidate of the one percenters. Who knew?
The rich like free trade and immigrant labor, apparently![]()
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
View attachment 60141
Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.Wrong.He's only 2 percentage points behind Trump, with the millionaire class
View attachment 60134
The new GOP favorite of the rich: CNBC survey
Wow, look at that. hillary, supposedly the warrior of the middle class, is THE favorite candidate of the one percenters. Who knew?
The rich like free trade and immigrant labor, apparently![]()
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
View attachment 60141
You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.Wrong.Wow, look at that. hillary, supposedly the warrior of the middle class, is THE favorite candidate of the one percenters. Who knew?
The rich like free trade and immigrant labor, apparently![]()
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
View attachment 60141
As you can see, a majority of the wealthy vote Republican. It's a voting block they cannot win without.
You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."
No.You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."
You don't?
You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.Wrong.The rich like free trade and immigrant labor, apparently![]()
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
View attachment 60141
As you can see, a majority of the wealthy vote Republican. It's a voting block they cannot win without.
LOL!!!
![]()
You consider having 1M in assets to be wealthy?You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.Wrong.
The rich like crony capitalism and gov't bailouts. That's why they tend to be Democrats.
View attachment 60141
As you can see, a majority of the wealthy vote Republican. It's a voting block they cannot win without.
LOL!!!
![]()
It's $50,000 shy of the top 5%. About 5% have $1M in assets. It's in the ballpark.
You consider having 1M in assets to be wealthy?You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."Thank you, Capt Irrelevant.
As you can see, a majority of the wealthy vote Republican. It's a voting block they cannot win without.
LOL!!!
![]()
It's $50,000 shy of the top 5%. About 5% have $1M in assets. It's in the ballpark.
![]()
No.You consider an income of 100,000 to be "wealthy."
You don't?
For starters, you confuse "income" with "wealth." They arent synonyms.
Second, in a place like NYC 100k wont get you very far. Income taxes will take nearly 60% of that. Cost of living is high. If you send a kid to private school you're pretty much way down the socio economic scale.
Finally just because someone has an income of 100k one year doesnt mean much. I had an income of more than that one year and was in the top 10% of earners. But that was because I sold a building i had owned a long time and had cap gains. The next year I was in the bottom.
Bernie Sanders Supporters: Short on Cash, Big on Time
But Tuesday was different. Tuesday was the night that Senator Bernie Sanders would, as the pundits described it, introduce himself to America at the Democratic primary debate. And nearly 250 people came out to the Dupont Circle bar to watch his turn onstage—people who’d kicked $5 and $10 occasionally to his campaign in support, but more often dedicated hours of their lives to his campaign
The rest of the Sanders supporters interviewed donated much smaller amounts—$5 here, $10 there, or however much money it took to purchase a T-shirt “so that I could show my support for him as often as possible,” said Alex Atkins, a student at the Georgetown Law Center who started a pro-Sanders club on campus. (He wore the shirt in question—bright green with a graphic rendition of Sanders’s glasses and trademark wild hair—under his corduroy blazer.)
I see this 2 ways.
1. it is fuckin ironic
2. he is supported by common folk. I would like to think common folk would appreciate work and such more than free shit and no military.
Sanders won't make it because he isn't rich enough. One has to be uber wealthy to have a shot. Sad fact. Big money always equates with big corruption. Always has always will.
Sanders won't make it because he isn't rich enough. One has to be uber wealthy to have a shot. Sad fact. Big money always equates with big corruption. Always has always will.
Oh, so you're a Trump supporter? Because he's not accepting money from anybody.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Bernie Sanders supporters live in a fairytail world they are not only naïve they're just plain stupid....
Fairytale
Dumb ass
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.
Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.
Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
You mean like SS protection CANDIDATE Obama received starting around May, 2007? That wasn't at taxpayer expense?
Consider it icing on the cake. The left STILL has nothing but hope and change to offer. BECAUSE it's all bullshit and doesn't work in the real world.The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.