Bernie Sanders supporters are broke

No.
For starters, you confuse "income" with "wealth." They arent synonyms.
Second, in a place like NYC 100k wont get you very far. Income taxes will take nearly 60% of that. Cost of living is high. If you send a kid to private school you're pretty much way down the socio economic scale.
Finally just because someone has an income of 100k one year doesnt mean much. I had an income of more than that one year and was in the top 10% of earners. But that was because I sold a building i had owned a long time and had cap gains. The next year I was in the bottom.

I'm not confusing anything. You said "you consider and income of $00,000 to be wealthy". Nothing in there about wealth. The average American income is $52,000. $100,000 is almost twice that. And a survey down here showed that in real terms average incomes are brought UP by the earnings of the wealthy - ie , you take the uber rich's incomes out of the equation and the average income declines markedly.
Are you stoned? You misread my post and then post false and confusing arguments against it.

Um, no. Methinks somebody has comprehension problems. Go reread the above thread. Then tell me I misread your post...
You seem to imply that an income of 100k qualifies somene as wealthy. I point out the issue with thT.
Then yoy have some irrelevant obvious bullshit about taking out the top income earners and the average declines. Were you always this good at math? Of course thats the case. So what?
You must be stoned.


Oh boy.....
Translation: Wow did he nail it and do I look like a boob.
Yup, that's it, kiwiboy. When you have something intelligent or even truthful to say about wealth and income come back to us.
 
Bernie Sanders Supporters: Short on Cash, Big on Time
But Tuesday was different. Tuesday was the night that Senator Bernie Sanders would, as the pundits described it, introduce himself to America at the Democratic primary debate. And nearly 250 people came out to the Dupont Circle bar to watch his turn onstage—people who’d kicked $5 and $10 occasionally to his campaign in support, but more often dedicated hours of their lives to his campaign
The rest of the Sanders supporters interviewed donated much smaller amounts—$5 here, $10 there, or however much money it took to purchase a T-shirt “so that I could show my support for him as often as possible,” said Alex Atkins, a student at the Georgetown Law Center who started a pro-Sanders club on campus. (He wore the shirt in question—bright green with a graphic rendition of Sanders’s glasses and trademark wild hair—under his corduroy blazer.)

I see this 2 ways.
1. it is fuckin ironic :rofl:
2. he is supported by common folk. I would like to think common folk would appreciate work and such more than free shit and no military.

You think a Georgetown law student is looking forward to a life of no work and 'free shit'?
 
The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.

Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.

Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
It would be more fun for you to explain why you jumped to Trump when the conversation is about Sanders fairy tale economics.

I was responding to the "free shit" comment. Apparently the comparison about "free shit" going to middle & low income working stiffs are "entitlements" & is considered socialist welfare, whilst a multimillionaire who needs zero help monetarily... gets taxpayer ( that means *you*) $$$ to pay for something that he can do himself 24/7... went right over your head.

lol.

I do hope that clears it up for you.
 
The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.

Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.

Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
It would be more fun for you to explain why you jumped to Trump when the conversation is about Sanders fairy tale economics.

I was responding to the "free shit" comment. Apparently the comparison about "free shit" going to middle & low income working stiffs are "entitlements" & is considered socialist welfare, whilst a multimillionaire who needs zero help monetarily... gets taxpayer ( that means *you*) $$$ to pay for something that he can do himself 24/7... went right over your head.

lol.

I do hope that clears it up for you.
No problem if you want the tax code to be fair let everyone pay the same percentage of income. Over 40 percent of the working population doesn't pay income taxes in your fair share world they should be paying the same as everyone else.
 
The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.

Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.

Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
It would be more fun for you to explain why you jumped to Trump when the conversation is about Sanders fairy tale economics.

I was responding to the "free shit" comment. Apparently the comparison about "free shit" going to middle & low income working stiffs are "entitlements" & is considered socialist welfare, whilst a multimillionaire who needs zero help monetarily... gets taxpayer ( that means *you*) $$$ to pay for something that he can do himself 24/7... went right over your head.

lol.

I do hope that clears it up for you.
No problem if you want the tax code to be fair let everyone pay the same percentage of income. Over 40 percent of the working population doesn't pay income taxes in your fair share world they should be paying the same as everyone else.
============
American society decided many years ago that a PROGRESSIVE income tax was the only really FAIR way to do things.

Those who receive a better life in this country OWE more to this country than the less fortunate.

The poor are barely surviving. On minimum wage jobs and jobs < barely above that > a person cannot survive in modern day America and MUST RELY on TAXPAYER SUPPORT in the form of welfare and aid to dependent children.

What are they supposed to pay taxes WITH?

Those who scream about ' half the people don't pay any tax ' are really saying " Mommy that's not fair... wah wah wah ... Jimmy doesn't pay tax so why should I... wah wah wah ".

They are like 3 year olds mentally and emotionally.

Step up folks ... grow a pair and man up and admit that those of us posting here < probably > have better lives than a great percentage of the American population and we OWE THIS COUNTRY for what we receive from it's society.

Sure we work(ed ) for our money but the poor work much harder ( physically ) than most of us ever had to and they get less from society for their hard work.
 
CY-Di93UQAEZbwZ.png
 
The RWers are giving up and resorting to Photoshops earlier than usual, I see.
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.

Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.

Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
It would be more fun for you to explain why you jumped to Trump when the conversation is about Sanders fairy tale economics.

I was responding to the "free shit" comment. Apparently the comparison about "free shit" going to middle & low income working stiffs are "entitlements" & is considered socialist welfare, whilst a multimillionaire who needs zero help monetarily... gets taxpayer ( that means *you*) $$$ to pay for something that he can do himself 24/7... went right over your head.

lol.

I do hope that clears it up for you.
No problem if you want the tax code to be fair let everyone pay the same percentage of income. Over 40 percent of the working population doesn't pay income taxes in your fair share world they should be paying the same as everyone else.


<<psssst>> leveling the tax rate & making it across the board equal is hardly fair. someone making $50K a year will take a much greater hit to the wallet than someone making $1,000,000,000 - however I said nothing about tax codes...

But thanx for playing the strawman card. :clap2:
 
Nah, trying to explain in even the simplest of terms how completely unrealistic Sanders free shit programs are fly's right over the lefts heads. Its a waste of time.

Can you explain why Trump is receiving Secret Service protection, at TAXPAYER expense before he's even a nominee? Surely he can afford his own bodyguards.

Oh that's right- it's called Corporate Welfare. & it's typical Republican hypocrisy.
It would be more fun for you to explain why you jumped to Trump when the conversation is about Sanders fairy tale economics.

I was responding to the "free shit" comment. Apparently the comparison about "free shit" going to middle & low income working stiffs are "entitlements" & is considered socialist welfare, whilst a multimillionaire who needs zero help monetarily... gets taxpayer ( that means *you*) $$$ to pay for something that he can do himself 24/7... went right over your head.

lol.

I do hope that clears it up for you.
No problem if you want the tax code to be fair let everyone pay the same percentage of income. Over 40 percent of the working population doesn't pay income taxes in your fair share world they should be paying the same as everyone else.
============
American society decided many years ago that a PROGRESSIVE income tax was the only really FAIR way to do things.

Those who receive a better life in this country OWE more to this country than the less fortunate.

The poor are barely surviving. On minimum wage jobs and jobs < barely above that > a person cannot survive in modern day America and MUST RELY on TAXPAYER SUPPORT in the form of welfare and aid to dependent children.

What are they supposed to pay taxes WITH?

Those who scream about ' half the people don't pay any tax ' are really saying " Mommy that's not fair... wah wah wah ... Jimmy doesn't pay tax so why should I... wah wah wah ".

They are like 3 year olds mentally and emotionally.

Step up folks ... grow a pair and man up and admit that those of us posting here < probably > have better lives than a great percentage of the American population and we OWE THIS COUNTRY for what we receive from it's society.

Sure we work(ed ) for our money but the poor work much harder ( physically ) than most of us ever had to and they get less from society for their hard work.

Society doesn't pay people first of all, employers pay people. Secondly, you don't get paid by how hard you work, you get paid by how much you can produce for your company. If you produce little, you get paid little. If you produce a lot, you get paid a lot.

You liberals live in this world where you think our country is one giant commune. In a commune, people do as they wish. Some just stay in the commune and smoke pot. Others stay in the commune and have children. Others go out and get money or supplies for the commune in which to operate. But eventually, the people bringing in the money to the commune stop, and that's why we don't have communes anymore: they failed.

People don't "receive" a better life than others, they make a better life than others. Big difference. Just like people make a crappy life for themselves. It's really up to the individual. We don't stand in a government line and get picked who is rich and who is poor. That's just a liberal hallucination. And why should taxpayers be obligated to support the children of others? If you can't afford children, don't have them. It's optional.

But if you ever see a guy go into your garage and steal your children's bikes, or your electric saw, or your lawnmower, don't cry like a 3 year old to the police. Just let them take your belongings because obviously, they need your property more than you do.

"Liberals believe that if you make money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money, you are."
Ken Blackwell
 

Forum List

Back
Top