Beware the affidavit

[Clipper]

Powell The Kraken Lady shows up at a QANON function in a clown suit, rants about Dotard being reinstated as duh Prez & the cult drools speaking in tongues. What a fucking country.

 

[Kilroy2]

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

So where is the video? Why suspend it when people could look at it and see the truth for themselves?

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

Fake News. Unnamed Sources. The guy who provided the evidence has publicly refuted this. You really have to stop falling for this unnamed source crap.

The Fake News is going to lose respect for you if you keep being this easy.

The guy says he overheard a conversations and in his statement he say he believes that the post mark date is relevant. The postal date is irrelevant as what matters is getting the vote to the state by a certain date. Simple isn't it.

So unless they deliver by 8 PM on Nov 3 to election officials it does not matter what the postal date is.

• There’s no postmark deadline for ballots in Michigan. The state requires ballots to be received by 8 p.m. on Nov. 3. Ballots received after that time — no matter the postmark — are not counted.

That is the law

Fake news yeah it certainly is as repub try to make a case when anything not delivered to state official by a certain time will not be counted.

They would still have to pick up the mail but it won't be counted.

This is a postal worker at the lowest level trying to understand a conversation he is overhearing by his boss. Delivering it by Nov 4 automatically disqualifies the vote despite the post mark date

In his statements the guy even says that he believes that the ballots have to be postmarked by Nov 3 for it to be counted. Yeah maybe in other states that will accept ballots after Nov 3rd.

Yet this is Michigan who does not accept any mail in ballots not in their hand by Nov 3rd. Post mark date is irrelevant.

The misunderstanding come into the fact that if on Nov 4 the ballot is still in the post office the worker believes that it will be counted.

So I guess as a post office you still got to deliver the mail to its source even if it is to late.

Fake news well something it is pretty obvious but for the superficial it is lack of understanding the process

yes but if a ballot has a post mark of Nov 4, no one is going to believe that it arrived before Nov 3.

If the guy admits that he fabricated the story to investigators then that is the end of it.

Alabama has the following

Postmarked 1 day before Election Day, received by noon on Election Day.

yet where is the proof that it was delivered on the 3rd. The source of the story already admitted that he made up the story.

no he didnt,,

Well yes he did to investigators and then took to social media and said he didn't recant. So who to believe. The guy who changed his story a couple of times.

senate hearing investigators said he recanted

Hopkins denied he had recanted his testimony in a video posted to YouTube on Tuesday night. “I did not recant my statements,” he said

who to believe? When faced with investigators and potential charges of filing a false affidavit which is the same as perjury in a court of law. Then he recants his original statements.

yet on social media he denies it. Sounds like a very believable guy who can't make up his mind.

I sure dont believe the government,, or the news media,,

and all you have to do is watch the video of what he actually said and not be a partisain hack,,

The question is why would you believe a guy saying something on video as being truthful?

Answer is because he is saying something that you want to hear.

His claim he overheard people planning fraud as he was walking by or maybe hiding around the corner listening in. Still it was a conversation he is claiming to overhear and that in itself is not proof.

are you now saying he didnt recant??

No I am saying, it is what you want to believe (that he heard supervisor talking about changing dates) and when he recants to authorities then you believe his video that he didn't recant as he claims in his video.

 

[progressive hunter]

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

So where is the video? Why suspend it when people could look at it and see the truth for themselves?

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

Fake News. Unnamed Sources. The guy who provided the evidence has publicly refuted this. You really have to stop falling for this unnamed source crap.

The Fake News is going to lose respect for you if you keep being this easy.

The guy says he overheard a conversations and in his statement he say he believes that the post mark date is relevant. The postal date is irrelevant as what matters is getting the vote to the state by a certain date. Simple isn't it.

So unless they deliver by 8 PM on Nov 3 to election officials it does not matter what the postal date is.

• There’s no postmark deadline for ballots in Michigan. The state requires ballots to be received by 8 p.m. on Nov. 3. Ballots received after that time — no matter the postmark — are not counted.

That is the law

Fake news yeah it certainly is as repub try to make a case when anything not delivered to state official by a certain time will not be counted.

They would still have to pick up the mail but it won't be counted.

This is a postal worker at the lowest level trying to understand a conversation he is overhearing by his boss. Delivering it by Nov 4 automatically disqualifies the vote despite the post mark date

In his statements the guy even says that he believes that the ballots have to be postmarked by Nov 3 for it to be counted. Yeah maybe in other states that will accept ballots after Nov 3rd.

Yet this is Michigan who does not accept any mail in ballots not in their hand by Nov 3rd. Post mark date is irrelevant.

The misunderstanding come into the fact that if on Nov 4 the ballot is still in the post office the worker believes that it will be counted.

So I guess as a post office you still got to deliver the mail to its source even if it is to late.

Fake news well something it is pretty obvious but for the superficial it is lack of understanding the process

yes but if a ballot has a post mark of Nov 4, no one is going to believe that it arrived before Nov 3.

If the guy admits that he fabricated the story to investigators then that is the end of it.

Alabama has the following

Postmarked 1 day before Election Day, received by noon on Election Day.

yet where is the proof that it was delivered on the 3rd. The source of the story already admitted that he made up the story.

no he didnt,,

Well yes he did to investigators and then took to social media and said he didn't recant. So who to believe. The guy who changed his story a couple of times.

senate hearing investigators said he recanted

Hopkins denied he had recanted his testimony in a video posted to YouTube on Tuesday night. “I did not recant my statements,” he said

who to believe? When faced with investigators and potential charges of filing a false affidavit which is the same as perjury in a court of law. Then he recants his original statements.

yet on social media he denies it. Sounds like a very believable guy who can't make up his mind.

I sure dont believe the government,, or the news media,,

and all you have to do is watch the video of what he actually said and not be a partisain hack,,

The question is why would you believe a guy saying something on video as being truthful?

Answer is because he is saying something that you want to hear.

His claim he overheard people planning fraud as he was walking by or maybe hiding around the corner listening in. Still it was a conversation he is claiming to overhear and that in itself is not proof.

are you now saying he didnt recant??

No I am saying, it is what you want to believe (that he heard supervisor talking about changing dates) and when he recants to authorities then you believe his video that he didn't recant as he claims in his video.

youre sure spending a lot of time telling me what to believe,,

 

[Kilroy2]

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

So where is the video? Why suspend it when people could look at it and see the truth for themselves?

US postal worker recants voter-fraud claims after Republicans call for inquiry – reports

Democrats on House oversight committee say worker retracted allegations in interview with investigators

www.theguardian.com

Guy claims something and signs the affidavit that it happen. When authorities question him he recants and says he made up the story; This will probably be the same for all these people who claim they saw some impropriety.

obvious repub that participated in election fraud

Why would these repubs make such accusation when they know that they will have to provide some evidence in a formal setting or face the consequences.

Well I can say that they probably take their lead from Ex president Trump and believe they can say anything and right wing sources will run with it. Everyone repeats it because Trump says so. Do they realize that in a few months he won't be able to pardon anyone.

The guy who witness the burning of ballots. He does take a picture but his story was still debunked as they were sample ballots that were burned probably by him. Photos of the ballots show that they were sample ballots. Yeah it is hard to believe he did not know that but instead posted online to be picked up and reported by others who are quick to believe.

Who is to blame for this misguided belief that lies matter? As the president case for voter fraud shrinks as more vote for Biden increase his lead, he can't accept it. His supporters can't accept it. Why can't they accept the obvious and believe in a person who lies. Even Eric Trump was quick to post this, never bother to fact check it. Just go with the flow

Video shared by Eric Trump showing a person ‘Burning 80 Trump Ballots’ is fake: city officials

Trump may be right about voter fraud but he is just literally encouraging his supporters to do it.

Well, good luck with that super pac fund he plans to set up. It will be a big success like his charity foundation is. Typo as it should be (was).

Fake News. Unnamed Sources. The guy who provided the evidence has publicly refuted this. You really have to stop falling for this unnamed source crap.

The Fake News is going to lose respect for you if you keep being this easy.

The guy says he overheard a conversations and in his statement he say he believes that the post mark date is relevant. The postal date is irrelevant as what matters is getting the vote to the state by a certain date. Simple isn't it.

So unless they deliver by 8 PM on Nov 3 to election officials it does not matter what the postal date is.

• There’s no postmark deadline for ballots in Michigan. The state requires ballots to be received by 8 p.m. on Nov. 3. Ballots received after that time — no matter the postmark — are not counted.

That is the law

Fake news yeah it certainly is as repub try to make a case when anything not delivered to state official by a certain time will not be counted.

They would still have to pick up the mail but it won't be counted.

This is a postal worker at the lowest level trying to understand a conversation he is overhearing by his boss. Delivering it by Nov 4 automatically disqualifies the vote despite the post mark date

In his statements the guy even says that he believes that the ballots have to be postmarked by Nov 3 for it to be counted. Yeah maybe in other states that will accept ballots after Nov 3rd.

Yet this is Michigan who does not accept any mail in ballots not in their hand by Nov 3rd. Post mark date is irrelevant.

The misunderstanding come into the fact that if on Nov 4 the ballot is still in the post office the worker believes that it will be counted.

So I guess as a post office you still got to deliver the mail to its source even if it is to late.

Fake news well something it is pretty obvious but for the superficial it is lack of understanding the process

yes but if a ballot has a post mark of Nov 4, no one is going to believe that it arrived before Nov 3.

If the guy admits that he fabricated the story to investigators then that is the end of it.

Alabama has the following

Postmarked 1 day before Election Day, received by noon on Election Day.

yet where is the proof that it was delivered on the 3rd. The source of the story already admitted that he made up the story.

no he didnt,,

Well yes he did to investigators and then took to social media and said he didn't recant. So who to believe. The guy who changed his story a couple of times.

senate hearing investigators said he recanted

Hopkins denied he had recanted his testimony in a video posted to YouTube on Tuesday night. “I did not recant my statements,” he said

who to believe? When faced with investigators and potential charges of filing a false affidavit which is the same as perjury in a court of law. Then he recants his original statements.

yet on social media he denies it. Sounds like a very believable guy who can't make up his mind.

I sure dont believe the government,, or the news media,,

and all you have to do is watch the video of what he actually said and not be a partisain hack,,

The question is why would you believe a guy saying something on video as being truthful?

Answer is because he is saying something that you want to hear.

His claim he overheard people planning fraud as he was walking by or maybe hiding around the corner listening in. Still it was a conversation he is claiming to overhear and that in itself is not proof.

are you now saying he didnt recant??

No I am saying, it is what you want to believe (that he heard supervisor talking about changing dates) and when he recants to authorities then you believe his video that he didn't recant as he claims in his video.

youre sure spending a lot of time telling me what to believe,,

You believe what you want to believe.