Biden jobless claims skyrocket to 861,000!

This guy is a complete disaster.


More evidence to support Biden’s Stimulus Plan


Gawd you're an idiot. :D

I AM NOT

Mother had me tested, the man said I was Special
a special commie
 
Actually you have it backwards

The reason that rural areas have paved roads, electricity, phone, modern schools and hospitals is because they have been subsidized by urban areas.

They are not cost effective on their own
Guess we'll keep all the food we grow, then.

Good luck eating your roads.

I imagine you can try, but the population centers are your market.
Most major cities have ports and can receive food from anywhere in the world. They already do.
We'll be fine. You'll starve. But think how smug you'll be about it!

Good luck to you.

The banks and financial centers are in the cities. Red America will perish without the support of the cities.

Food is a commodity. It can be purchased from anywhere in the world. Your international markets are limited without access to ports which are in the cities
"Red America". That's more apropos to the Commie Democrat-run cities, actually.

Meanwhile, rural America will be fine. You'll be starving in a week. Then you'll try to send people with guns to take food.

That won't work, either.

You're screwed.
Not really
Just look at a map

Blue areas have our ports and major transportation hubs. Where there are ports, there are oil refineries. Blue areas are also where the financial centers are.

Blue areas will have to get food from abroad. Much like japan or Hawaii does today. You will be cut off from your markets at home and abroad. Also cut off from gas.

Red states will be howling in a month. They don’t call them flyover states for nothing.
Blue areas have our ports and major transportation hubs. Where there are ports, there are oil refineries.

Almost half of the US refined oil comes from TX and LA, Dumbass.
 
Nah, planes hitting towers didn't start the Iraq War. Bush did.

No one is surprised as to your ignorance on events leading up to the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. It is surprising that you have done nothing in all these years to correct your shortcomings.

As you SHOULD know, the United Nations issued dozens of resolutions against Saddam Hussein over the years. They also authorized the use of force in removing Hussein as did the United States legislature issued an authorization to declare war.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .



Former Vice President Joe Biden urged the U.S. government in 1998 to pursue a strategy to ‘dethrone’ Saddam Hussein over allegations the Iraqi strongman was hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Biden, the-then ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of President Bill Clinton’s most vocal allies in the battle to pressure Hussein to abide by terms established after the Gulf War requiring Iraq to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. - Former Vice President Joe Biden 1998 1998: Joe Biden Urged U.S. to 'Dethrone' Saddam Hussein Over WMDs

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003
 
Last edited:
Nah, planes hitting towers didn't start the Iraq War. Bush did.

No one is surprised as to your ignorance on events leading up to the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. It is surprising that you have done nothing in all these years to correct your shortcomings.

As you SHOULD know, the United Nations issued dozens of resolutions against Saddam Hussein over the years. They also authorized the use of force in removing Hussein as did the United States legislature issued an authorization to declare war.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .



Former Vice President Joe Biden urged the U.S. government in 1998 to pursue a strategy to ‘dethrone’ Saddam Hussein over allegations the Iraqi strongman was hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Biden, the-then ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of President Bill Clinton’s most vocal allies in the battle to pressure Hussein to abide by terms established after the Gulf War requiring Iraq to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. - Former Vice President Joe Biden 1998 1998: Joe Biden Urged U.S. to 'Dethrone' Saddam Hussein Over WMDs

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003
Remember, the left called Bush the dumbest man in the world.

And he was able to fool ALL those Democrats. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Are you sure it is not $20 a gallon?
As long as you are making up numbers

As you know, and so easily "forget" is that it was President Obama who stated that was fine with him if gas reached $4.00 per gallon. He did say that he wished the price had increased more slowly.

What segment of our society is hurt by high gas and energy prices?
 
Last edited:
thirty days in office they were still blaming Oblama in 2017.

That's chump change. 8 years in office they were still blaming Bush. Hell, Quid Pro Job Killin' Joe was whining about it from his basement during the campaign.
see, we should continue the tradition of blaming the last president because Bush bitched about Clinton for eight years. Mission accomplished!

Sorry, that didn't happen. But you and I both know the Obamunist blamed Bush for 8 years.

That he did. Nothing was ever his or his adminstrations fault. It was Bush's fault.
 
This guy is a complete disaster.


More evidence to support Biden’s Stimulus Plan
that would be the stimulous to have higher numbers of unemployment? great plan its working
gas prices--up 50 cents a gallon in less than a month...great stimulous plan
get over 12,000 fired off the pipeline---great stimulous plan
should i continue? you fucking brain dead asswipe demonRATS are very sick fucking idiots...just saying
The price increase started in December-duh...
When was it again that Biden was elected? November? I know you're not the brightest bulb on the tree, Moonie but the Private Sector "anticipates" what's coming in the future! As soon as Drooling Joe got elected it was a foregone conclusion that the price of oil and natural gas would be going up substantially! $2.60 in Florida now...up fifty cents in a month. It'll be $3.00 by summer and still rising. We'll see close to $4.00 by Thanksgiving.
Are you sure you didn‘t mean $20 a gallon?
You're going to own $4.00 a gallon gas, Winger! Every time an American stands in front of the pump and watches the dial spin, they're going to think back to when Trump was in office and they could fill their tank for half what it's GOING to cost them under Biden! That's a cost that you won't be able to blame on anyone but the left wing of the Democratic Party and Joe Biden!

Are you sure it is not $20 a gallon?
As long as you are making up numbers
I can remember it at almost $5 a gallon. Hell $20 would get you a quarter of a tank.

Last month I was paying $1.50 or less for gas. Now its $2.65 and that because the speculators are gearing up for Biden's ending fracking. He's already ceased drilling on Fed land so expect high gas prices folks cause they are coming.
 
This guy is a complete disaster.


More evidence to support Biden’s Stimulus Plan
that would be the stimulous to have higher numbers of unemployment? great plan its working
gas prices--up 50 cents a gallon in less than a month...great stimulous plan
get over 12,000 fired off the pipeline---great stimulous plan
should i continue? you fucking brain dead asswipe demonRATS are very sick fucking idiots...just saying
The price increase started in December-duh...
When was it again that Biden was elected? November? I know you're not the brightest bulb on the tree, Moonie but the Private Sector "anticipates" what's coming in the future! As soon as Drooling Joe got elected it was a foregone conclusion that the price of oil and natural gas would be going up substantially! $2.60 in Florida now...up fifty cents in a month. It'll be $3.00 by summer and still rising. We'll see close to $4.00 by Thanksgiving.
Are you sure you didn‘t mean $20 a gallon?
You're going to own $4.00 a gallon gas, Winger! Every time an American stands in front of the pump and watches the dial spin, they're going to think back to when Trump was in office and they could fill their tank for half what it's GOING to cost them under Biden! That's a cost that you won't be able to blame on anyone but the left wing of the Democratic Party and Joe Biden!

Are you sure it is not $20 a gallon?
As long as you are making up numbers
I can remember it at almost $5 a gallon. Hell $20 would get you a quarter of a tank.

Last month I was paying $1.50 or less for gas. Now its $2.65 and that because the speculators are gearing up for Biden's ending fracking. He's already ceased drilling on Fed land so expect high gas prices folks cause they are coming.
If I were you I would rush out and buy an electric car
Just like Biden wants you to
 
This guy is a complete disaster.


More evidence to support Biden’s Stimulus Plan
that would be the stimulous to have higher numbers of unemployment? great plan its working
gas prices--up 50 cents a gallon in less than a month...great stimulous plan
get over 12,000 fired off the pipeline---great stimulous plan
should i continue? you fucking brain dead asswipe demonRATS are very sick fucking idiots...just saying
The price increase started in December-duh...
When was it again that Biden was elected? November? I know you're not the brightest bulb on the tree, Moonie but the Private Sector "anticipates" what's coming in the future! As soon as Drooling Joe got elected it was a foregone conclusion that the price of oil and natural gas would be going up substantially! $2.60 in Florida now...up fifty cents in a month. It'll be $3.00 by summer and still rising. We'll see close to $4.00 by Thanksgiving.
Are you sure you didn‘t mean $20 a gallon?
You're going to own $4.00 a gallon gas, Winger! Every time an American stands in front of the pump and watches the dial spin, they're going to think back to when Trump was in office and they could fill their tank for half what it's GOING to cost them under Biden! That's a cost that you won't be able to blame on anyone but the left wing of the Democratic Party and Joe Biden!

Are you sure it is not $20 a gallon?
As long as you are making up numbers
I can remember it at almost $5 a gallon. Hell $20 would get you a quarter of a tank.

Last month I was paying $1.50 or less for gas. Now its $2.65 and that because the speculators are gearing up for Biden's ending fracking. He's already ceased drilling on Fed land so expect high gas prices folks cause they are coming.
If I were you I would rush out and buy an electric car
Just like Biden wants you to

Nope. I'll stick with my gas powered Truck. Electric cars are expensive as hell and I doubt they could pull my horse trailer.

His wanting everyone to buy an electric vehicle is another reason to kick Biden to the curb.
 
The pitiful pivot. Next up Neo-GOP screeches about Fiscal Responsibility and demands a new Debt Ceiling limit debate.
 
This guy is a complete disaster.


More evidence to support Biden’s Stimulus Plan
that would be the stimulous to have higher numbers of unemployment? great plan its working
gas prices--up 50 cents a gallon in less than a month...great stimulous plan
get over 12,000 fired off the pipeline---great stimulous plan
should i continue? you fucking brain dead asswipe demonRATS are very sick fucking idiots...just saying
The price increase started in December-duh...
When was it again that Biden was elected? November? I know you're not the brightest bulb on the tree, Moonie but the Private Sector "anticipates" what's coming in the future! As soon as Drooling Joe got elected it was a foregone conclusion that the price of oil and natural gas would be going up substantially! $2.60 in Florida now...up fifty cents in a month. It'll be $3.00 by summer and still rising. We'll see close to $4.00 by Thanksgiving.
Are you sure you didn‘t mean $20 a gallon?
You're going to own $4.00 a gallon gas, Winger! Every time an American stands in front of the pump and watches the dial spin, they're going to think back to when Trump was in office and they could fill their tank for half what it's GOING to cost them under Biden! That's a cost that you won't be able to blame on anyone but the left wing of the Democratic Party and Joe Biden!

Are you sure it is not $20 a gallon?
As long as you are making up numbers
I can remember it at almost $5 a gallon. Hell $20 would get you a quarter of a tank.

Last month I was paying $1.50 or less for gas. Now its $2.65 and that because the speculators are gearing up for Biden's ending fracking. He's already ceased drilling on Fed land so expect high gas prices folks cause they are coming.
If I were you I would rush out and buy an electric car
Just like Biden wants you to
who gives 2 shits what xiden wants? no one in their right mind would...
 
The pitiful pivot. Next up Neo-GOP screeches about Fiscal Responsibility and demands a new Debt Ceiling limit debate.
Common sense tells you that you can have an entitlement society or you can have open borders...you can't have both because you can't pay for it! So what's it going to be, Boo? A border that doesn't stop anyone and entitlements that have to be slashed...or a border that's secure so we can at least attempt to pay for all the goodies you on the left want to give away?
 

Forum List

Back
Top