Biden plans to undermine the Supreme Court.

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

 

[pknopp]

I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy they balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

Totalitarian is their goal. Don’t ever defy us is their message.

Unfortunately for them the SC isn’t under their control and never will be. These are the death rattles of a failed administration trying to stay alive. They’re more afraid Sotomayor is going to retire or die giving Trump yet another SC pick.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.

Let’s start in congress and the senate first.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Biden’s brain is pudding. Who is running this circus?

 

[pknopp]

Let’s start in congress and the senate first.

All of them. Good with me. Is that controversial? I hope not.

 

[ozro]

He can say these things but he simply doesn't have the support to get it done legally.
At this point if he tries another illegal EO it will trigger a war he can't survive

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

And? These are all common sense suggestions. There should be no lifetime tenure on the SC (15-20 years max) and there should be an ethics code. As well as a morality code for nominees.
Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women was made public. Alito and Thomas should both be shown the door
for their ethics violations.

None of this is "undermining" the institution.

 

[pknopp]

And? These are all common sense suggestions. There should be no lifetime tenure on the SC (15-20 years max) and there should be an ethics code. As well as a morality code for nominees.
Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women was made public. Alito and Thomas should both be shown the door
for their ethics violations.

None of this is "undermining" the institution.

While I support an ethics code you most certainly need more than simple accusations to dismiss someone.

 

[Toro]

Biden to announce support for major changes to Supreme Court amid outrage over recent decisions: report

President Biden is reportedly planning to propose changes to the U.S. Supreme Court that could include proposals for legislation to establish term limits.

www.foxnews.com

President Biden is reportedly planning to endorse major changes to the U.S. Supreme Court, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, as growing outrage continues following a series of controversial decisions.

"This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long-established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights (that is a lie) and civil rights (that is a lie) to taking away a woman’s right to choose (that is a lie), to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,(that is a lie)" Biden said in public remarks later that day.


Comment:
Our constitution was designed to protect the citizens from a tyrannical government.
The Supreme Court is trying to protect us from the lawless Democrat Party.
They are not saving "democracy", they want a one-party dictatorship.
The corrupt Democrat Party can't operate within the bounds of our constitution; therefore, they are trying to destroy the balance of power between the Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.
This is very dangerous; they will create a totalitarian police state.

What's wrong with term limits and a code of ethics for justices?

Virtually all other national Supreme Courts have some sort of term limits on those serving on the court.

And why is a code of ethics bad? I have a code of ethics at work that if I don't abide by, I can get fired. And my job isn't near as important as a SCOTUS justice. Do you think that justices should be able to act unethically?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

And? These are all common sense suggestions. There should be no lifetime tenure on the SC (15-20 years max) and there should be an ethics code. As well as a morality code for nominees.
Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women was made public. Alito and Thomas should both be shown the door
for their ethics violations.

None of this is "undermining" the institution.

So innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply to judges? That’s an interesting take. What crimes were all of those you listed proven and how many were just made up left wing bullshit?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So innocent until proven guilty doesn’t apply to judges? That’s an interesting take. What crimes were all of those you listed proven and how many were just made up left wing bullshit?

In the case of Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations, there were two direct witnesses that gave testimony to their moral unworthiness to sit on the SC. Their nominations should have been pulled immediately.
As far as Thomas' ethics violations and straight up taking bribes (the gifts and consideration he got, may as well be), that's pretty well documented.

 

[Moonglow]

By law, Congress can apply rules legislated to the Supreme Court.

 

[Jarlaxle]

And? These are all common sense suggestions. There should be no lifetime tenure on the SC (15-20 years max) and there should be an ethics code. As well as a morality code for nominees.
Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women was made public. Alito and Thomas should both be shown the door
for their ethics violations.

None of this is "undermining" the institution.

Any and all of that would require an amendment. Which isn't happening.

 

[Billiejeens]

I'm not sure why anyone would be against an ethics code. It's pretty sad that there isn't one already.

Poor pk

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Any and all of that would require an amendment. Which isn't happening.

Other legislative and executive ways to make it happen.

 

[fncceo]

Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations should have been scrapped the moment allegations of their crappy behavior toward women

An accusation of crappy behavior against A woman, or a homosexual, or a transgender, or ethic minority isn't crappy behavior against an entire group of person that is currently the fashionably protected group.

If being crappy to any person over the course of your life disqualifies anyone from public office than our halls of state are going to be mighty empty.

Human beings are frequently crappy to each other , it defines us as a species.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

In the case of Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations, there were two direct witnesses that gave testimony to their moral unworthiness to sit on the SC. Their nominations should have been pulled immediately.
As far as Thomas' ethics violations and straight up taking bribes (the gifts and consideration he got, may as well be), that's pretty well documented.

You had more witnesses in both cases that testified nothing of the sort happened. So you had two so called witnesses and dozens of others saying it never happened.

Where’s your case?

 

[Billiejeens]

In the case of Thomas and Kavanaugh's nominations, there were two direct witnesses that gave testimony to their moral unworthiness to sit on the SC. Their nominations should have been pulled immediately.
As far as Thomas' ethics violations and straight up taking bribes (the gifts and consideration he got, may as well be), that's pretty well documented.

Each of them admitted lying.
Your echo chamber does you a disservice.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Other legislative and executive ways to make it happen.

Which the court rules unconstitutional. Good luck.