Synthaholic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Not talking about your posts, Will.Nice job keeping this thread clean of trolls and deflectors.
Not a deflection, syn.
Think about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not talking about your posts, Will.Nice job keeping this thread clean of trolls and deflectors.
Not a deflection, syn.
Think about it.
No binding precedent was set by the decision. It will be revisited and soon, I'll wager.
In business? Then serve everyone equally.
In business? Then serve everyone equally.
soooo twitter and facebook shouldnt ban conservatives right commie ?
I don't think the SCOTUS decision affects people who go into florist shops and piss on the floor, curse at the florist, and smash merchandise.
Why would people want to hire someone that does not want to work for them unless they are ust looking for a lawsuit.
Within reason. "No shoes, no shirt, no service" is the most prevalent, and is for health and safety reasons.All businesses in this country have the right to refuse service to anyone.
Just because they say it doesn't mean it's legal.Why would people want to hire someone that does not want to work for them unless they are ust looking for a lawsuit.
Do you remember the signs in some business windows that read " we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"?
Apparently you are unable to read.
It’s a settled, accepted fact of law that religious beliefs don’t justify ignoring or violating just and proper laws, such as public accommodations laws.
Moreover, the enforcement of just and proper laws in no manner restricts or violates religious liberty or expression.
Just because they say it doesn't mean it's legal.Why would people want to hire someone that does not want to work for them unless they are ust looking for a lawsuit.
Do you remember the signs in some business windows that read " we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"?
Why would people want to hire someone that does not want to work for them unless they are ust looking for a lawsuit.
Do you remember the signs in some business windows that read " we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"?
Getting too involvd ,sorry took off sarcastic post.Why argue? No minds are changed.Within reason. "No shoes, no shirt, no service" is the most prevalent, and is for health and safety reasons.All businesses in this country have the right to refuse service to anyone.
Many of the Prog politicians do not believe in this. That means things get bad they will become Hitleresque. They already are to the Deplorables.Nice job keeping this thread clean of trolls and deflectors.
In business? Then serve everyone equally.
You mean like letting the President have an account on Twitter and Facebookburning?
I don't think the SCOTUS decision affects people who go into florist shops and piss on the floor, curse at the florist, and smash merchandise.