2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,139
- 52,387
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #21
Yeah no actual evidence of anything, especially non-consent. Clinton was a dog, which is not good as it cost us the 8 year Dubya disaster. Was he a rapist? A little too forward? Did the women just feel guilty afterwards? Are they making money off of this?No. 2 accusers of rape. If there was even the tiniest bit of evidence, then we'd have something to talk about. The third you mentioned is of some kind of groping that can never be proven, or have evidence provided, or anything.Cosby is not convicted, but has had over 50 women accuse him of drugging and raping them. Clinton has 2 women, no mention of drugs, and no evidence of no consent. Hastert was found guilty of paying his victims off. Not of raping them, but for bribing them. Statute of limitations and all that. Hastert could have appealed but chose not to, likely proving that he knows he's guilty.yes....that is what they said about bill cosby...right? or dennis hastert....right?
How about the asshole raped her and got away with it because he was the Attorney General of Arkansas...and his wife used their political power and private detectives to keep these women intimidated......
Did you read that post you just typed......
Clinton has 2 women,
No...clinton has 3 women, that we know of who said he raped them.....then you have 12 or more who accuse him of attempted sexual assault....one of the rape victims was from Britain...when he was a Rhodes scholar...and there are probably more over there......
No....
Juanita Broaderick
Eileen Wellstone
Elizabeth Ward Gracen
And those are the ones we know about......all of them immediately told freinds and relatives after the rape happened....and Wellstone even contacted the police.......
All of these women are lying...and only bill clinton is telling the truth...right?
Well if there was any actually verifiable information we might have an idea.
You mean like the woman in England calling the police......they have records of that....
And you mean like telling friends and family immediately after the attack...you mean like that?
She Told Friends:
Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred.
A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.)
Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.
----------
Clinton Is Guilty:
If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.