Bill O'Reilly.....Slaves that built the white house were well fed

Steak and caviar at every meal

Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'

"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."


Conservatives are absolutely clueless

Is it a fact or not? Were they well fed? I don't understand if Bill O'Reilly is correct then he is correct on it. Are you saying they were not well fed? I don't understand your objection.

He's trying to mitigate slavery. And he's ONLY doing it because of race.

The truth would mitigate slavery not what Bill O'reilly said. What if slaves were well fed?

What does that even mean?

I don't know if you are familiar with the concept of truth but it would mean that if it is true then it wouldn't matter what Bill O'reilly said because the history of the event would actually be the slaves were well fed. It wouldn't matter what anyone else in the future said about it.

What does what the slave eats have to do with what the First Lady said?

O'Reilly: Michelle may wake up in a house built by slaves, but those slaves had oatmeal for breakfast
 
Last edited:
Because they want to pretend that slavery wasnt bad......beeeecaaause they were given the left overs. Lucky them
 
Democrats are the party of the three "s"

slavery, segregation and socialism

they have always been racist
they just picked a different race now

good news, with their divisive politics
they have segregated us as a people

with Democrat's tax/spend policies
the whole US will be one big plantation and
all the American people will be slaves

Liberals freed the slaves and secured equal rights for black Americans. Conservatives fought them every step of the way.
Just as conservatives today fight to deny women, gay Americans, and those transgender their rights.
 
Is it a fact or not? Were they well fed? I don't understand if Bill O'Reilly is correct then he is correct on it. Are you saying they were not well fed? I don't understand your objection.

He's trying to mitigate slavery. And he's ONLY doing it because of race.

The truth would mitigate slavery not what Bill O'reilly said. What if slaves were well fed?

What does that even mean?

I don't know if you are familiar with the concept of truth but it would mean that if it is true then it wouldn't matter what Bill O'reilly said because the history of the event would actually be the slaves were well fed. It wouldn't matter what anyone else in the future said about it.

What does what the slave eats have to do with what the First Lady said?

Nothing. I didn't bring this issue up. I think that was you because you are the OP of this thread so you answer your own question.
 
Because they want to pretend that slavery wasnt bad......beeeecaaause they were given the left overs. Lucky them

I don't think anyone has ever publicly said "Slavery wasn't that bad". I believe the issue of slavery was settled in 1865 so why not just leave it there so we can talk about something more relevant to today's politics? It would be really great if we can do that but I suspect that a lot of communist have figured out that the best way to destroy this country's ideal of freedom is to destroy it's foundation by presenting the founders as hypocrites.
 
Steak and caviar at every meal

Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'

"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."


Conservatives are absolutely clueless

Bill's a former history teacher, he likes to be as factual as possible. Notice that he did admit that yes slaves were used. Is his claim that those slaves were well fed inaccurate? Yes, or no?
 
Because they want to pretend that slavery wasnt bad......beeeecaaause they were given the left overs. Lucky them

I don't think anyone has ever publicly said "Slavery wasn't that bad". I believe the issue of slavery was settled in 1865 so why not just leave it there so we can talk about something more relevant to today's politics? It would be really great if we can do that but I suspect that a lot of communist have figured out that the best way to destroy this country's ideal of freedom is to destroy it's foundation by presenting the founders as hypocrites.

We are the product of our history. Slavery is part of that history

The First Lady was pointing out how far we have come in that she wakes up in a house built by slaves and now her black family now lives and plays in that same house
 
Steak and caviar at every meal

Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'

"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."


Conservatives are absolutely clueless

Bill's a former history teacher, he likes to be as factual as possible. Notice that he did admit that yes slaves were used. Is his claim that those slaves were well fed inaccurate? Yes, or no?

What does what the slaves ate have to do with what the First Lady said?

Seems like a thinly disguised attempt to downplay the impact of slavery
 
[


Would anyone who is on welfare vote for the politician that wants to get rid of it? Politicians that push these welfare schemes have got to know that on some level.

Not only do they know it they thrive on it.

It is greed that drives the voters to the Democrats.
 
Who would want this bitch for President unless they could get a bigger welfare check out of her?

howto-makeamerica-great-again-fwd-lock-her-up-3146162.png
 
Because they want to pretend that slavery wasnt bad......beeeecaaause they were given the left overs. Lucky them

I don't think anyone has ever publicly said "Slavery wasn't that bad". I believe the issue of slavery was settled in 1865 so why not just leave it there so we can talk about something more relevant to today's politics? It would be really great if we can do that but I suspect that a lot of communist have figured out that the best way to destroy this country's ideal of freedom is to destroy it's foundation by presenting the founders as hypocrites.

We are the product of our history. Slavery is part of that history

The First Lady was pointing out how far we have come in that she wakes up in a house built by slaves and now her black family now lives and plays in that same house

That is not really true for all of us considering that a lot of us can trace our ancestry to other countries and that ancestry started after 1865.
 
Steak and caviar at every meal

Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'

"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."


Conservatives are absolutely clueless
O'Reilly is a NE liberal.

What did you expect???
 


No what was the last non racist republican?

What was? Do you mean who was the last non racist republican. There aren't any. Never has been. There are still racist Republicans and Democrats.


Ok I have to spell it put....the last republican who ran for president that wasn't racist...who was n it?

And I gave you your answer. Reagan was not overtly racist, nor were the either two Bushes. Nixon was, Trump is.

So why have liberals painted every b republican racist???? Every election?

I did say overtly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
States Rights trumps Slavery.

Just ask any Southern conservative, circa 50 years ago or more.


Sorry, but the constitution was amended by republicans to.prevent that...although it exists in leftwing transfer payments
The Constitution was amended by liberal Republicans to abolish slavery, but was resisted by Southern conservatives for another century who insisted states rights took precedence.


Wrong, watch Lincoln........conservative republicans backed lincoln

Cray eh? Conservative republicans for.the abolition of slavery in 1860s.....who knew?

What conservative Republicans?

The slavery issue at that time hinged on states rights. Conservatives are and were FOR states rights, and states rights were considered essential to protect the slave states.


No...William taft, william mckinley were both conservative republicans in.1890s......learn history

No they were progressives in the so-called Progressive Era.
 
Slavery ended in 1866. That you retards can not grasp that fact and continue to complain about something that hasn't been in the US for 150 years is amazing. By the way Republicans ran the Government that freed the slaves and Democrats ran the Governments that oppressed blacks for the next 100 years.
 
Bill O'Reilly's credentials as an historian are mocked by real historians

His "Killing" books are looked at as entertainment fabricated for the masses
 
Slavery ended in 1866. That you retards can not grasp that fact and continue to complain about something that hasn't been in the US for 150 years is amazing. By the way Republicans ran the Government that freed the slaves and Democrats ran the Governments that oppressed blacks for the next 100 years.

Nobody is complaining on anything other than Republicans defending slavery
 
Slavery ended in 1866. That you retards can not grasp that fact and continue to complain about something that hasn't been in the US for 150 years is amazing. By the way Republicans ran the Government that freed the slaves and Democrats ran the Governments that oppressed blacks for the next 100 years.

Nobody is complaining on anything other than Republicans defending slavery
Except that doesn't and has not happened you made it all up. get over it, the actual party that supported slavery was the democratic party for over 100 years.
 
Steak and caviar at every meal

Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'

"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."


Conservatives are absolutely clueless

I hope he was kidding. *shakes head*
 

Forum List

Back
Top