Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean the "well fed and had decent lodgings" part? Is that the part that is bothering you? That's all relative, anyway, isn't it, and apparently a two hundred year old perspective? I'm assuming whatever "well fed" meant, it wasn't a diet Bill would want to subsist on. You gotta take O'Reilly with a grain of salt, and not so seriously. As much as he may want to think so, he is not the sole voice of the conservative nation.Did you see the threads popping up on it yesterday, again, after her speech Monday night? I think he was just trying to get his fellow goons on the same page with some facts for once.Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Why are Liberals against understanding history with the correct facts?
Nothing wrong with facts, but what was the point of bringing it up? Michelle Obama was not casting aspersions on anyone with her comments, in fact she was detailing how far we have come as a country. Why did Mr. O'Reilly feel that her statement needed an addendum, THAT particular addendum?
Okay, so why add that particular clarification to the facts? He could have simply said, Mrs Obama was correct, the White House was built by slaves and she's right "We've come a long way, baby!"
Waiting for what? I answered you right here: Bill O'Reilly.....Slaves that built the white house were well fed
No what was the last non racist republican?
What was? Do you mean who was the last non racist republican. There aren't any. Never has been. There are still racist Republicans and Democrats.
Ok I have to spell it put....the last republican who ran for president that wasn't racist...who was n it?
Democrats are the party of the three "s"
slavery, segregation and socialism
they have always been racist
they just picked a different race now
good news, with their divisive politics
they have segregated us as a people
with Democrat's tax/spend policies
the whole US will be one big plantation and
all the American people will be slaves
Liberals freed the slaves and secured equal rights for black Americans. Conservatives fought them every step of the way.
Wrong, republicans did those things in spite of democrat filibustering and obstructionism.
Party identification and political philosophy are two different things. I'm not surprised you don't know that.
Jmo, but I think it's a story that needs t be told. Fully. How the slaves were treated, what became of them, where'd they come from, why were they used, etc.You mean the "well fed and had decent lodgings" part? Is that the part that is bothering you? That's all relative, anyway, isn't it, and apparently a two hundred year old perspective? I'm assuming whatever "well fed" meant, it wasn't a diet Bill would want to subsist on. You gotta take O'Reilly with a grain of salt, and not so seriously. As much as he may want to think so, he is not the sole voice of the conservative nation.Did you see the threads popping up on it yesterday, again, after her speech Monday night? I think he was just trying to get his fellow goons on the same page with some facts for once.Why are Liberals against understanding history with the correct facts?
Nothing wrong with facts, but what was the point of bringing it up? Michelle Obama was not casting aspersions on anyone with her comments, in fact she was detailing how far we have come as a country. Why did Mr. O'Reilly feel that her statement needed an addendum, THAT particular addendum?
Okay, so why add that particular clarification to the facts? He could have simply said, Mrs Obama was correct, the White House was built by slaves and she's right "We've come a long way, baby!"
Yeah, that's the part that's "bothering" me. He had no reason to bring up that the slaves were "well fed and had decent lodgings". It was stupid. He should have stopped at "Mrs. Obama was right".
Are you reading the other voices of the "conservative nation"?
The Constitution was amended by liberal Republicans to abolish slavery, but was resisted by Southern conservatives for another century who insisted states rights took precedence.States Rights trumps Slavery.Oh...they were "well fed"? That makes it all better then.Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Freedom Schmeedom, Am I right?
Just ask any Southern conservative, circa 50 years ago or more.
Sorry, but the constitution was amended by republicans to.prevent that...although it exists in leftwing transfer payments
Still waiting
Waiting for what? I answered you right here: Bill O'Reilly.....Slaves that built the white house were well fed
No what was the last non racist republican?
What was? Do you mean who was the last non racist republican. There aren't any. Never has been. There are still racist Republicans and Democrats.
Ok I have to spell it put....the last republican who ran for president that wasn't racist...who was n it?
And I gave you your answer. Reagan was not overtly racist, nor were the either two Bushes. Nixon was, Trump is.
Waiting for what? I answered you right here: Bill O'Reilly.....Slaves that built the white house were well fed
No what was the last non racist republican?
What was? Do you mean who was the last non racist republican. There aren't any. Never has been. There are still racist Republicans and Democrats.
Ok I have to spell it put....the last republican who ran for president that wasn't racist...who was n it?
And I gave you your answer. Reagan was not overtly racist, nor were the either two Bushes. Nixon was, Trump is.
So why have liberals painted every b republican racist???? Every election?
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Jmo, but I think it's a story that needs t be told. Fully. How the slaves were treated, what became of them, where'd they come from, why were they used, etc.You mean the "well fed and had decent lodgings" part? Is that the part that is bothering you? That's all relative, anyway, isn't it, and apparently a two hundred year old perspective? I'm assuming whatever "well fed" meant, it wasn't a diet Bill would want to subsist on. You gotta take O'Reilly with a grain of salt, and not so seriously. As much as he may want to think so, he is not the sole voice of the conservative nation.Did you see the threads popping up on it yesterday, again, after her speech Monday night? I think he was just trying to get his fellow goons on the same page with some facts for once.Nothing wrong with facts, but what was the point of bringing it up? Michelle Obama was not casting aspersions on anyone with her comments, in fact she was detailing how far we have come as a country. Why did Mr. O'Reilly feel that her statement needed an addendum, THAT particular addendum?
Okay, so why add that particular clarification to the facts? He could have simply said, Mrs Obama was correct, the White House was built by slaves and she's right "We've come a long way, baby!"
Yeah, that's the part that's "bothering" me. He had no reason to bring up that the slaves were "well fed and had decent lodgings". It was stupid. He should have stopped at "Mrs. Obama was right".
Are you reading the other voices of the "conservative nation"?
O'Reilly obviously has a different agenda.
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
In case its escaped your notice slavery was legal back then. In fact it was accepted back then.
Your bullshit is just that bullshit.
Catch a clue moron.
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
In case its escaped your notice slavery was legal back then. In fact it was accepted back then.
Your bullshit is just that bullshit.
Catch a clue moron.
Ummm......Thanks Capt Obvious
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
It's also the right's contrarian idiocy, that Obama is "always wrong."There is nothing in there suggesting O'Reilly was claiming slavery was ok which was being implied and in some cases said outright by you and your fellow lefties. Got it, good, so long."Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."It's amazing how you dumbasses can read something and manage to find things in the content that were never said.
Give us your explanation
Yet, O'Reilly is soft selling the institution of slavery
"well fed and had decent lodgings" is an attempt to justify the use of slave labor
It wasn't so bad
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Is it a fact or not? Were they well fed? I don't understand if Bill O'Reilly is correct then he is correct on it. Are you saying they were not well fed? I don't understand your objection.
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Is it a fact or not? Were they well fed? I don't understand if Bill O'Reilly is correct then he is correct on it. Are you saying they were not well fed? I don't understand your objection.
It's also the right's contrarian idiocy, that Obama is "always wrong."There is nothing in there suggesting O'Reilly was claiming slavery was ok which was being implied and in some cases said outright by you and your fellow lefties. Got it, good, so long."Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."It's amazing how you dumbasses can read something and manage to find things in the content that were never said.
Give us your explanation
Yet, O'Reilly is soft selling the institution of slavery
"well fed and had decent lodgings" is an attempt to justify the use of slave labor
It wasn't so bad
Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Is it a fact or not? Were they well fed? I don't understand if Bill O'Reilly is correct then he is correct on it. Are you saying they were not well fed? I don't understand your objection.
He's trying to mitigate slavery. And he's ONLY doing it because of race.
Of course most on the right are trying to drag us back to the 19th Century."Plantation mentality"Republicans also believe they were "happy" because they "sang all the time".Which is why Republicans are 90% white and the Democrats are everyone else. Makes perfect sense.Democrats are the party of the three "s"
slavery, segregation and socialism
they have always been racist
they just picked a different race now
good news, with their divisive politics
they have segregated us as a people
with Democrat's tax/spend policies
the whole US will be one big plantation and
all the American people will be slaves
plantation mentality
just the way democrats like it
Someone tell the RWrs that we aren't in the 19th century anymore.
The slaves of the Democrat welfare plantation are well fed also.
They are welfare slaves but they really only have one job to do for a few minutes every four years. All they have to do is vote for a filthy ass Democrat then they get their food stamps, free medical care, housing subsidies, Obamaphones and be told they are victims.
Actually that slavery isn't all that bad is it? Beats the hell out of working for a living, doesn't it?
