Redfish
Diamond Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 48,366
- 10,793
Did you see the threads popping up on it yesterday, again, after her speech Monday night? I think he was just trying to get his fellow goons on the same page with some facts for once.Steak and caviar at every meal
Bill O'Reilly: Slaves who built White House were 'well-fed'
"Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz."
Conservatives are absolutely clueless
Why are Liberals against understanding history with the correct facts?
Nothing wrong with facts, but what was the point of bringing it up? Michelle Obama was not casting aspersions on anyone with her comments, in fact she was detailing how far we have come as a country. Why did Mr. O'Reilly feel that her statement needed an addendum, THAT particular addendum?
Okay, so why add that particular clarification to the facts? He could have simply said, Mrs Obama was correct, the White House was built by slaves and she's right "We've come a long way, baby!"
I don't see why todays conservatives feel they need to defend slavery
no one is defending it, you lying asshole.
But you lefties are defending the current liberal programs the make slaves of urban and poor americans. Slaves to the federal government rather than slaves to the plantation owner----------------but slaves either way.