Bizarre Hypothetical Outcome of Impeachment

[Ray From Cleveland]

Impeachment is a political process whether we like it or not...........but we never expected to be used in the current way it has been used.......as we never thought the politicians would go this low........

A President can be Impeached for being a drunk.............which is not a crime.........but they can Impeach him if he couldn't lay off the bottle..............

So the Political Wankers get away with this BS...........and show how Ridiculous they have become......It's COMEDY CENTRAL.

The Democrat party are pretty stupid people. After all this time, they still don't get that payback is a bitch. But....they will be reminded of that with the next commie President, I assure you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Bullshit. That is a fact. It is a felony. That's why you are a dumbass!

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

That's exactly what happened, dumbass!

Factually incorrect. His deposition was in a civil lawsuit. A private matter.

His testimony was in front of a federal grand jury as a sitting President.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Perjury is a high crime, dumbass!

Maybe. Maybe not.

Bullshit. That is a fact. It is a felony. That's why you are a dumbass!

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

Forget the high crime nonsense. What Clinton did AS PRESIDENT was commit a felony. As outlined by the Constitution, is grounds for impeachment. Furthermore he also violated his oath of office at the same time.

 

[colfax_m]

Maybe. Maybe not.

Bullshit. That is a fact. It is a felony. That's why you are a dumbass!

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

Forget the high crime nonsense. What Clinton did AS PRESIDENT was commit a felony. As outlined by the Constitution, is grounds for impeachment. Furthermore he also violated his oath of office at the same time.

We’ll never know. He wasn’t ever convicted of a felony.

I don’t know how to forget “high crime nonsense” since that is part of the constitution.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Deep state.. if this was trump you would have federal prosecutors from every state investigating.. biden probably hired many of them

Bull. It is three years into his term two of which Repubs had complete control. That excuse expired.

Trump is a out sider.. every federal prosecutor in America probably has some connection to Joe Biden Obama.. it’s the deep state.. they all have shit in each other.. you think Barr’s first priority is biden? And he can’t be seen as trumps personal lawyer.. that’s why Giuliani has been in Ukraine

Every federal prosecutor was appointed by Trump. Spare us the bullshit.

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Bullshit. That is a fact. It is a felony. That's why you are a dumbass!

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

Forget the high crime nonsense. What Clinton did AS PRESIDENT was commit a felony. As outlined by the Constitution, is grounds for impeachment. Furthermore he also violated his oath of office at the same time.

We’ll never know. He wasn’t ever convicted of a felony.

I don’t know how to forget “high crime nonsense” since that is part of the constitution.

He was convicted of perjury which is a felony. A felony is a higher crime than a misdemeanor outlined in the Constitution.

 

[colfax_m]

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

That's exactly what happened, dumbass!

Factually incorrect. His deposition was in a civil lawsuit. A private matter.

His testimony was in front of a federal grand jury as a sitting President.

My mistake. I was 100% incorrect.

 

[colfax_m]

Bull. It is three years into his term two of which Repubs had complete control. That excuse expired.

Trump is a out sider.. every federal prosecutor in America probably has some connection to Joe Biden Obama.. it’s the deep state.. they all have shit in each other.. you think Barr’s first priority is biden? And he can’t be seen as trumps personal lawyer.. that’s why Giuliani has been in Ukraine

Every federal prosecutor was appointed by Trump. Spare us the bullshit.

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

 

[Jitss617]

If republicans let this thing have wings it could take a year.. democrats are going to call witnesses after all the ones fail lol

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump is a out sider.. every federal prosecutor in America probably has some connection to Joe Biden Obama.. it’s the deep state.. they all have shit in each other.. you think Barr’s first priority is biden? And he can’t be seen as trumps personal lawyer.. that’s why Giuliani has been in Ukraine

Every federal prosecutor was appointed by Trump. Spare us the bullshit.

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

 

[colfax_m]

Every federal prosecutor was appointed by Trump. Spare us the bullshit.

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

 

[Jitss617]

EPIC: Mark Levin destroys Democrats over their hypocritical attacks on Trump

 

[Flash]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

The sonofabitch can't deny he did it because we have a video of him bragging about putting pressure on the Ukraine government to cut off funds to stop investigating his crackhead son.

Slam dunk impeachment using the same criteria the filthy Democrat Dirty Tricks Department is using on Trump..

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

 

[colfax_m]

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

No, making a mistake is also perjury. All they have to prove is you knew something beforehand. Look up the Scooter Libby case. President Trump, did you know so-and-so? Trump: No, I don't recall meeting him or her. Then they whip out some photo of Trump and X together at a party somewhere. Forget the fact that he only knew the person long enough for the picture. Forget the fact that Trump meets thousands of new people every year. Forget the fact he takes hundreds and hundreds of pictures a year. He testified under oath that he didn't know so-and-so, when in fact, he took a picture with him.

 

[Syriusly]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

You kids still haven't figured out why what tRump did is wrong, have you.

No. Joe Biden was the point man of an internation push to get the corrupt prosecutor removed. There was no motive of personal gain.

You mean other than his drug addict son receiving kickbacks from the Ukrainian company that was under investigation?

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

The Donald's kids work for a family company that profits from Donald being President. The only reason those kids have those jobs is because their name is Trump.

 

[Syriusly]

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

No, making a mistake is also perjury. All they have to prove is you knew something beforehand. Look up the Scooter Libby case. President Trump, did you know so-and-so? Trump: No, I don't recall meeting him or her. Then they whip out some photo of Trump and X together at a party somewhere. Forget the fact that he only knew the person long enough for the picture. Forget the fact that Trump meets thousands of new people every year. Forget the fact he takes hundreds and hundreds of pictures a year. He testified under oath that he didn't know so-and-so, when in fact, he took a picture with him.

It is all about knowingly making a false statement.

Whoever—
person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or
statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

 

[Syriusly]

Every federal prosecutor was appointed by Trump. Spare us the bullshit.

They are all in the system and no he didn’t you liar

“all in the system” means what exactly?

The president appoints US attorneys. This pathetic excuse that he doesn’t have anyone he can trust only reflects on his own incompetence.

Anybody who testifies for his defense is also subject to cross examination by the accusers.

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

The President in incapable of not lying.

Which is why Trump will not allow himself to be put under oath.

 

[Syriusly]

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

The Constitution says high crimes and misdemeanors. A felony is a more serious offense than a misdemeanor. There is no debating Clinton committed a felony, and there is no debating that the Senators that voted not-guilty violated their oath of office.

A high crime means a crime committed in the capacity of his public office.

Forget the high crime nonsense. What Clinton did AS PRESIDENT was commit a felony. As outlined by the Constitution, is grounds for impeachment. Furthermore he also violated his oath of office at the same time.

We’ll never know. He wasn’t ever convicted of a felony.

I don’t know how to forget “high crime nonsense” since that is part of the constitution.

He was convicted of perjury which is a felony. A felony is a higher crime than a misdemeanor outlined in the Constitution.

No- Clinton was not 'convicted' of perjury.