Bizarre Hypothetical Outcome of Impeachment

[Syriusly]

Impeachment is a political process whether we like it or not...........but we never expected to be used in the current way it has been used.......as we never thought the politicians would go this low........

A President can be Impeached for being a drunk.............which is not a crime.........but they can Impeach him if he couldn't lay off the bottle..............

So the Political Wankers get away with this BS...........and show how Ridiculous they have become......It's COMEDY CENTRAL.

The Democrat party are pretty stupid people. After all this time, they still don't get that payback is a bitch. But....they will be reminded of that with the next commie President, I assure you.

Oh certainly the Democrat Party has learned from Republicans all about payback.
I just hope we Democrats start acting as corruptly as the Trump Party.

 

[colfax_m]

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

No, making a mistake is also perjury. All they have to prove is you knew something beforehand. Look up the Scooter Libby case. President Trump, did you know so-and-so? Trump: No, I don't recall meeting him or her. Then they whip out some photo of Trump and X together at a party somewhere. Forget the fact that he only knew the person long enough for the picture. Forget the fact that Trump meets thousands of new people every year. Forget the fact he takes hundreds and hundreds of pictures a year. He testified under oath that he didn't know so-and-so, when in fact, he took a picture with him.

No, it takes more than just a false statement. Scooter Libby’s case is instructive because it is so misunderstood. In Libby’s case, his false statements all lined up in a way that helped exculpate Cheney. You could tell that this was an intentional lie by the way that the lie was crafted for a purpose. It was very difficult to believe these were simply mistakes he made.

 

[Faun]

Maybe. Maybe not.

Bullshit. That is a fact. It is a felony. That's why you are a dumbass!

Is it a fact? He was acquitted. So the only people that get to decide if it was a high crime decided you’re a dumbass.

Perjury is a felony and a high crime. That has nothing to do with the Senate voting to not remove him.

You don’t get to decide what a high crime is.

No, the law is very clear. You just cannot read.

Imbecile. The Graham rule...

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job in this constitutional republic, if this body determines that your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role.” ~ Lindsey Graham​

 

[Faun]

None of your business. If the DoJ has predicate for an investigation, they can pursue it. Go to a judge and get a subpoena.

But if he had a reason to hold it, and the reason in BIDENS then they are part of the trial.. what are you afraid of.. hey who funded Ukraine energy? Was that MY TAX MONEY?

If Congress wants to have testimony for government officials detailing why Shokin was fired, then they should testify.

Wait, hold on. They already did that. It turns out the reason is bullshit. Glad we could clear that up.

The firing of shokin came out of John Kerry’s office.. guess who’s friends with the bidens lol you don’t want to go further do you? Lol

I just want you to be honest. The firing of Shokin came out of the career diplomatic staff in Ukraine.

Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz (stepson to John Kerry) formed Rosemont capital which has received millions of dollars from Ukraine and China.

So?

 

[sparky]

That this country would lower itself to choices like Pence or Biden speaks volumes

~S~

 

[Faun]

If Congress wants to have testimony for government officials detailing why Shokin was fired, then they should testify.

Wait, hold on. They already did that. It turns out the reason is bullshit. Glad we could clear that up.

The firing of shokin came out of John Kerry’s office.. guess who’s friends with the bidens lol you don’t want to go further do you? Lol

I just want you to be honest. The firing of Shokin came out of the career diplomatic staff in Ukraine.

Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz (stepson to John Kerry) formed Rosemont capital which has received millions of dollars from Ukraine and China.

So?

HUNTER BIDEN IS A CRACK HEAD LOL do you want your taxes going to pay for a politicians son?

Whose tax dollars are going to Hunter?? You said his money came from Ukraine and China.

 

[bripat9643]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

Republicans have the ability to investigate Biden right now.

They aren’t. Doesn’t that strike you as odd?

Republicans are a very timid lot. They are probably afraid of the media shit storm that would ensue if they did.

 

[bripat9643]

The firing of shokin came out of John Kerry’s office.. guess who’s friends with the bidens lol you don’t want to go further do you? Lol

I just want you to be honest. The firing of Shokin came out of the career diplomatic staff in Ukraine.

Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz (stepson to John Kerry) formed Rosemont capital which has received millions of dollars from Ukraine and China.

So?

HUNTER BIDEN IS A CRACK HEAD LOL do you want your taxes going to pay for a politicians son?

Whose tax dollars are going to Hunter?? You said his money came from Ukraine and China.

It's coming out of the money we send to Ukraine.

 

[Faun]

I just want you to be honest. The firing of Shokin came out of the career diplomatic staff in Ukraine.

Hunter Biden and Chris Heinz (stepson to John Kerry) formed Rosemont capital which has received millions of dollars from Ukraine and China.

So?

HUNTER BIDEN IS A CRACK HEAD LOL do you want your taxes going to pay for a politicians son?

They aren't. Try again.

So where did Ukraine get the money to fund their energy????

That money went to their government, not private businesses. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong is wrong with you??

 

[keepitreal]

I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Unless the president is a Democrat

 

[Crepitus]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

You kids still haven't figured out why what tRump did is wrong, have you.

No. Joe Biden was the point man of an internation push to get the corrupt prosecutor removed. There was no motive of personal gain.

You mean other than his drug addict son receiving kickbacks from the Ukrainian company that was under investigation?

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

Lol, is that what I said?

I don't remember saying that.

Could you quote me?

 

[Crepitus]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

You kids still haven't figured out why what tRump did is wrong, have you.

No. Joe Biden was the point man of an internation push to get the corrupt prosecutor removed. There was no motive of personal gain.

You mean other than his drug addict son receiving kickbacks from the Ukrainian company that was under investigation?

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

The Donald's kids work for a family company that profits from Donald being President. The only reason those kids have those jobs is because their name is Trump.

Don't forget ivanka's Chinese trademarks and Jared's visa sales.

 

[bripat9643]

You kids still haven't figured out why what tRump did is wrong, have you.

No. Joe Biden was the point man of an internation push to get the corrupt prosecutor removed. There was no motive of personal gain.

You mean other than his drug addict son receiving kickbacks from the Ukrainian company that was under investigation?

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

The Donald's kids work for a family company that profits from Donald being President. The only reason those kids have those jobs is because their name is Trump.

Don't forget ivanka's Chinese trademarks and Jared's visa sales.

What about them? Weren't they totally legal?

 

[Crepitus]

You mean other than his drug addict son receiving kickbacks from the Ukrainian company that was under investigation?

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

The Donald's kids work for a family company that profits from Donald being President. The only reason those kids have those jobs is because their name is Trump.

Don't forget ivanka's Chinese trademarks and Jared's visa sales.

What about them? Weren't they totally legal?

Then So was Hunter Biden's job.

 

[bripat9643]

A. If trading on your family name is a crime then tRump and all his kids would be in jail by now.

B. It wasn't under investigation. That's part of why the prosdcpros was removed.

The Donald’s kids work for foreign companies that are getting special treatment from the President?

The Donald's kids work for a family company that profits from Donald being President. The only reason those kids have those jobs is because their name is Trump.

Don't forget ivanka's Chinese trademarks and Jared's visa sales.

What about them? Weren't they totally legal?

Then So was Hunter Biden's job.

Nope. It violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

 

[my2¢]

Sound plausible?

First I can't see Trump ever thinking he did wrong and resigning even if the writing was on the wall. Secondly I can't see the Senate Democrats not backing Biden and all they would need is 34 votes to prevent his removal.

 

[Faun]

Okay. So?

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

No, making a mistake is also perjury. All they have to prove is you knew something beforehand. Look up the Scooter Libby case. President Trump, did you know so-and-so? Trump: No, I don't recall meeting him or her. Then they whip out some photo of Trump and X together at a party somewhere. Forget the fact that he only knew the person long enough for the picture. Forget the fact that Trump meets thousands of new people every year. Forget the fact he takes hundreds and hundreds of pictures a year. He testified under oath that he didn't know so-and-so, when in fact, he took a picture with him.

"No, making a mistake is also perjury."

No, it is not you fucking moron. It's intentionally lying under circumstances where intentionally lying is a crime...

18 U.S. Code § 1621.Perjury generally

Whoever—
having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true;​

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So, that's when the accusers try to trick Trump into perjury; through their questioning.

Lol. I’m sure it’d be super hard to get Trump to lie.

It has nothing to do with lying. For instance, Let's say they asked Trump what date he talked to Zelensky, and Trump was off by two days. That's technically perjury. Or, they ask Trump about something they know is classified, and if Trump mistakingly answers them, he made himself a felon, and perhaps even treason.

So you see, it's not that Trump is hiding anything, it's just that these clowns spend years in college to learn how to trip up Mother Teresa. It's called a process crime. And since Trump's testimony wouldn't help him anyway, why would Trump take the chance of damaging himself to help the commies?

Being off by two days most definitely isn’t going to be considered perjury unless there’s something far more to it. You see, to prove perjury, you have to prove they knew what they were saying was a lie and not an honest mistake.

No, making a mistake is also perjury. All they have to prove is you knew something beforehand. Look up the Scooter Libby case. President Trump, did you know so-and-so? Trump: No, I don't recall meeting him or her. Then they whip out some photo of Trump and X together at a party somewhere. Forget the fact that he only knew the person long enough for the picture. Forget the fact that Trump meets thousands of new people every year. Forget the fact he takes hundreds and hundreds of pictures a year. He testified under oath that he didn't know so-and-so, when in fact, he took a picture with him.

No, it takes more than just a false statement. Scooter Libby’s case is instructive because it is so misunderstood. In Libby’s case, his false statements all lined up in a way that helped exculpate Cheney. You could tell that this was an intentional lie by the way that the lie was crafted for a purpose. It was very difficult to believe these were simply mistakes he made.

They continued the Libby case long after they learned it was Armitage that actually leaked to the media. But Armitage was generally well liked among people in both parties. So Armitage could not darken the Bush presidency. Instead of dropping the case which any honest person would have done, they continued until they got some bogus procedural charges on him.

 

[Lakhota]

Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

You mean like another blowjob impeachment?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Impeachment is a political process whether we like it or not...........but we never expected to be used in the current way it has been used.......as we never thought the politicians would go this low........

A President can be Impeached for being a drunk.............which is not a crime.........but they can Impeach him if he couldn't lay off the bottle..............

So the Political Wankers get away with this BS...........and show how Ridiculous they have become......It's COMEDY CENTRAL.

The Democrat party are pretty stupid people. After all this time, they still don't get that payback is a bitch. But....they will be reminded of that with the next commie President, I assure you.

Oh certainly the Democrat Party has learned from Republicans all about payback.
I just hope we Democrats start acting as corruptly as the Trump Party.

Let's see: the DNC and Hillary Clinton paid a firm that hired a retired foreign agent, who got his information from the Russian government, on her political foe, Donald Trump. They falsified documents to obtain a surveillance warrant on the staff of this opponent, not once, but several times. This is the same person who bleach bitted her server, which she shouldn't have had sensitive and classified material on after being subpoenaed by the US Congress. The FBI agent that they appointed to do the Hillary interview was the very same who was texting, with another FBI employee, how anti-Trump they were. Hillary's husband met with the AG for a private meeting on her plane. She never recused herself. She claimed she would conduct her charges based on what the FBI director recommend she do, which has never been done before. Comey then appeared in pubic, listed Hillary's crimes, and then told the AG not to prosecute.

But you hope the Democrats become corrupt as the Trump administration? Trump is ten miles behind the commies.