It had everything to do with it.Again RETARD it had nothing to do with the race of the man that was shot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It had everything to do with it.Again RETARD it had nothing to do with the race of the man that was shot.
No it did not race baiter. If he had been white, he would have been shot too.It had everything to do with it.
No he wouldn't, I have posted several cases where a white man threatened the police and have even shot them and didn't end up dead.No it did not race baiter. If he had been white, he would have been shot too.
No, he was shot for being stupid enough to open the door with s gun in his handThen the officer should have left his in the car. If having a gun turns a situation into a threatening one then every interaction with a police officer is a threatening situation. The airman was shot for exercising his right in his own home. The he officer was wrong and handled this interaction poorly from the start. Hopefully he will not get a free pass
Any dirtbag or crazy civilian the deputy encounteredWho was he defending himself against?
You should ask the police officerSo why that guy and not this one.
This one is OBVIOUSLY a threat.
View attachment 944908
Just what do you suppose the difference is?
That will never happen, nor should it.The other bright side will be the officer being violated repeatedly behind bars. Each cock in his ass will be a reminder that murdering people is wrong even if you have a badge.
The Airman was neither.Any dirtbag or crazy civilian the deputy encountered
So the deputy had no choice he was powerless to anything other than kill the airman. Come one man even you can’t believe what you claimed. The deputy needed better training but instead is looking at charges against himNo, he was shot for being stupid enough to open the door with s gun in his hand
The deputy was armed because that was part of his job
He had to knock on that door and deal with whatever was on the other side
But the airman had a choice and he chose wrong
He didn’t encounter either of thoseAny dirtbag or crazy civilian the deputy encountered
We can assume that after the fact without knowing for sureThe Airman was neither.
Kill or be killedSo the deputy had no choice he was powerless to anything other than kill the airman.
There was no indication the airman had any intention to shoot the deputy, but we do know the deputy shot the airman before allowing him a chance to follow any instructions. Better training would have benefited this officer, he decided to make the worst possible choicesKill or be killed
The deputy had no obligation to allow himself to be shot
In that case he should not have been hold a gunThere was no indication the airman had any intention to shoot the deputy, but we do know the deputy shot the airman before allowing him a chance to follow any instructions. Better training would have benefited this officer, he decided to make the worst possible choices
How long has it taken for you to become so radical?
The black guy should not have opened the door with a gun in his hand
So why that guy and not this one.
This one is OBVIOUSLY a threat.
View attachment 944908
Just what do you suppose the difference is?
They are always too quick to shoot, has the question been asked: Are you training officers wrong in immediately resorting to deadly force? The airman likely did not raise his gun, and I'd be suspicious if they say he did.Up to 40% of Wrong Address LEO incursions end in situations like this
So why that guy and not this one.
This one is OBVIOUSLY a threat.
View attachment 944908
Just what do you suppose the difference is?
The cop is under an obligation to follow the law. He isn't exempt from it. He broke the law.We can assume that after the fact without knowing for sure
But he was certainly stupid to open the door with s gun in his hand
Not at all. I deplore police misconduct and abusive Govt.