I'm not trying to be racist pussy. You're like a jew who if you say one thing negative about Israel, you're anti semetic. Fuck off pussy. If you appreciated my liberalness maybe I'd care but you don't. And on top of that you accuse me of being racist for not wanting my daughter to bring home a black guy but clearly the black community has a problem with their black women dating white guys. Deny it and you're a liar.sealybobo
I'm not a white supreme. It's science.
It's not science. It's pseudo science
But if you think science can settle moral questions, then you need only look at the different scientific opinions over something like climate change / global warming or what were long considered settled matters (like evolution) to see how there is no one scientific opinion on any moral issue
And how about white people ? They're certainly less genetically diverse than Blacks, but they obviously have genetic variance between sayā¦ Scandinavians and Italians or Anglo Saxons and Spaniardsā¦ but evidently, those genetic differences are somehow never linked to intelligence.
Why don't you theorize on which group of White people are the least intelligent.
No !
That's only used for talking about black ppl. Right ?
Who are the genetically dumber and disadvantaged Whites ? If there is enough genetic difference for whites to have different hair color, eye color and different average height, then why not intelligence ?
The answer is because this is not science, itās politics and to ask that question doesn't serve the political goals of racist Whites.
You donāt want to face the idea that you might belong to the dumbest group of White people in your little hierarchy. So you theorize that āWhitenessā simply makes all Whites just as capable, and all Blacks equally disadvantaged
sealybobo
in which Blacks average an IQ of 85, Whites 100, and East Asians 106.
Serial killer Ted Bundy apparently had an IQ around 140........ genius level in your world.
But would it be right to be label a guy who used to slit women from vagina to throat as intelligent ?
And if you really believed in IQ then why don't you drive your arguments to it's logical conclusion ? That is why aren't you demanding everything be based on IQ ? Jobs ? Presidential elections ? Birth Licences ? driving licences ?
I'll wait
But if you are trying to ground IQ as a genetic product of race the very first thing you NEED to do is offer up a genetic or biological definition of race, something no one has not done nor has any
study.
But I always, sit back, invite them to give such a definition. Mainly because their fumbling attempts to deīne race point out just how subjective such definitions are. In close to a decade of debating race with racists.
I have yet to see any one of them, no matter what their scientific credentials, offer up
an acceptably neutral definition of race.
No-one has shown that human variation is great enough to account for differences of IQ, nor has
anyone established the veracity of IQ as a legitimate measurement. No one has provided an
inextricable link between genetics, race, and IQ outside of methodologically flawed correlations.
You make the claim, then you prove the claim. The fact that they are incapable of doing so
makes my life very easy.
Truth is in neurology no one takes IQ seriously. It is archaic and only really useful to social scientists. Neurologists who have a better understanding of how the brain works because they spend decades of their lives studying it have little to no use for it, but to the public at large it is so important. Because the public is only concerned with what feels like it should be true rather than what is actually the case in reality.
Irony is Alfred Binet created IQ testās to see which children werenāt proīting from the Parisian school system, not so that they could be labelled stupid but so new educational programs could be created to help those children. He was afraid that his tests would be misused for nepharious reasons, and poor Alfred, he must have been psychic because once white supremacits got a hold of it, it took on
a whole new meaning
sealybobo
These brain size differences, containing millions of brain cells and hundreds of millions of synapses underlie the race differences on IQ tests, African-descended people (Blacks) average cranial capacities of 1267 cm3, European-descended people (Whites) 1347 cm3, and East Asian-descended people (East Asians) 1364 cm3
I said to you before if it's about brain size then why don't whales run the world ?
Whatās actually sad from a scientific perspective is how guys like you get away with obviously ignoring neuroscientific facts (not hypotheses) such as structural plasticity or neuroplasticity.
There are many physiological processes in the brain that control cognitive performance. Size plays a minor role within a given species, if any at all, especially in humans where the differences are small and on an individual level.
The brain-to-body mass will not get you any further either. Among mammals, that ratio is greatest in mice, next to humans. Itās even higher in birds.
If you want to look at the absolute amount, hereās a simple example that I gave you before.
A Chihuahua and a Rottweiler are able to learn the same tricks although their brain sizes differ considerably. On the other hand, the cognitive capabilities of a Rottweiler are not superior to the Chihuahua proportionally to its brain size.
The question then is, what is the rest of the Rottweilerās brain matter doing if it canāt learn more than its tiny species mate? A plausible conclusion would be that there must be something else at work and that a given cognitive performance is independent of the brain mass of an individual within a given species, (and also brain-to-body mass cross-species.)
Neuroscientists have already found a few answers to that question. Once again, the keyword is plasticity, ie. rewiring of synapses. Directly observable and experimentally reproducible, synaptic rewiring has a strong environmental component.
Apart from that, there are also other parts involved in cognitive processes such as the cerebellum. Neuronal density is also thought to play a big role. However the precise physiological mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Full stop. A bunch of cooked up stats by a handful of quacks will certainly not contribute anything productive to the serious research of neuroscientists.
But alas, you have already decided you are right and the rest of the world is wrong. And of course, the lack of absolute differences between brains across groups is merely a minor problem in this whole grand delusion of racial superiority ; )
sealybobo
I know this is making you uncomfortable.
No making me uncomfortable at all. White people were saying that black people were stupid long before the IQ. You are always going to need some kinda of scientific rationale to justify any type racism. That's racism 101.
But what I can not understand is this : Why canāt you be just a racist ? Why do you need these pseudos scientifical explanations? What is wrong with racism? You do promote it, so why be a shame of it?
Just say āN****S are stupid.ā? And be done.
That's mystery to me.
Bottom line is if you believe in evolution, and you look at how much smarter a border collie is than a rotweiller, then you know it's possible for one breed of a species to be smarter than another. Sure outside influences played a role but it's true none the less. But it offends you to think for the last 500 years blacks have been bred differently than whites and that might mean today whites are SLIGHTLY more intelligent.
Don't hang your hat on the brain size thing. I am not married to brain size equating to intelligence. You could certainly have a bigger brain than a really smart 5 foot white woman. Her little brain could be smarter than your big brain I agree.
And that's not to say some blacks aren't smarter than some whites. Evolution happens slowly over hundreds thousands and millions of years. We are all 99% the same. It's that one percent I'm talking about. Not even.
If it's true does that make me a racist for seeing it or saying it? I could be wrong. Just hypothesizing. And remember, I blame whites for this. For 500 years we controlled your breeding just like we do dogs today. It's our fault if we are smarter.
