There is something hokey about this article and its assumptions? Fifty analysts see something no one else sees? Why fifty, does it really take that many analysts? I'm sorry but this seems more like the BS Internet media makes up out of mostly thin air. I think 35 would have sufficed or even one credible person. It reminds me of the modern age in which children whine because its cloudy out. We'll shall see where it goes, Fox will cover it, Rush will cover it, the moans and groans will be heard for a day or so, and then the next big BS story will appear to keep the puppets occupied. Maybe the next story will have a hundred analysts or at least a reasonable facsimile. LOL The modern media age in the time of Obama is a funny place.