Born free, and everywhere chained by religion.

which does not mean it is not going to be reversed.

blacks were considered property and not equal to others as well.
So were women, And children.

The emancipation of the unborn is the next one.

Nowhere in Europe is there any prospect of banning abortion. You know the position in America better that I do - but do you really consider that pro life is in the ascendency? I know you want it to be but is it?

As long as the pro abortion groups continue to eliminate their offspring and genes from the population it will be.

The secret is to keep it a legal and safe procedure for those families who find themselves in the unfortunate position of having to agonize over the decision, and then to educate the population to a point where abortion is no longer an 'industry'.

The technology isn't going to go away, but the industrialization of it is enough to break a Monkeys heart.
 
Scott Roeder, Eric Rudolph are true believers, and both committed murder. Last time I looked, murder is a violent act.

This is the hypocrisy common among most Christians and conservatives: when a Christian commits an act of terrorism, the individual alone is responsible having nothing to do with his faith: for a Muslim, however, Islam alone is to blame.

Yes. of course. hypocrisy.

It can't possibly be because people are familiar with both faiths. Namely that Christianity teaches people not to engage in violence and that Islam has Jihad as a central tenent. A tenant that is very often interpreted to include violence.

^^^ There's a modern truth to this...​

To Progress! :beer: And having the likes of the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition firmly in history's rear-view mirror!


And to the acceleration of tolerance, forced or chosen, by those who follow the God of Abraham, as described in The Torah, The New Testament and The Koran! :beer:
 
America is no exception. Many Muslim and Sikh temples are burned and their pilgrims murdered here in the U.S.. The Jews, Catholics and Mormons are mistreated by the holier than thou evangelicals. The "my God is better than your god" mentality is ramped in America. It's taking over politics now. Freedom of religion is only for those that capitulate to the evangelicals.

Is there some parallel United Sates you inhabit that the rest of us do not? How many temples have been burned and how many Muslims and Sikhs have been murdered over the past ten years?

As for mistreatment of Jews, Mormons and Catholics, they seem to be faring well for themselves these days.
 
A staggering 100,000 Christians are killed annually because of their faith, anti-Christian violence is on the rise in countries like Pakistan, Nigeria and Egypt.

"Credible research has reached the shocking conclusion that an estimate of more than 100,000 Christians are violently killed because of their faith every year.
 
The full quote of Marx, in context is thus:

"Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people".

You and others equate Marxism with totalitarianism/despotism which suggests a limited understanding of history (to be nice). Simply because one has empathy for those in poverty does not make them a supporter of the form of government which exists in Russia or China, et al 'communist' states.

This entire RED SCARE neo McCarthyism is at best disingenuous and divisive and prevents any intelligent dialogue directed toward reform in our country. Notice how many consider the PPACA "socialism" and yet support a neo fascism plutocracy, which seems to describe the prevalent description of political economy in our nation today.

Of course I equate Marx to totalitarianism. It is the only way to achieve his "healthy" society. You see, Marxism is the antithesis of human nature. So, as human nature seems to be the barrier, you must use force to get everyone "walking in the same healthy direction." Modern Marxists have abandoned Marx. Why? Because Marx was dead wrong about how a communist society would come about.

"Modern Marxists have abandoned Marx"? Really? So what makes them Marxists?

You missed my point by a mile. The Red Scare has become a running theme on this message board, I suggest you read my post again and then some history, with particular attention to the plight of the average person living in the period known as the Gilded Age up to the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935.

Then consider the post WWII economic boom followed by the failure of Voodoo Economics and today, the era of blame.

In one respect you are right. Economic 'theory', be it Marxist or Supply Side, which does not take into account human nature is nothing more than a postulate.

Gilded Age was a natural transition into an national industrial economy. There is no country that does not see this transition at one time or another. Once unemployment becomes low the demand for labor goes up and the market levels off, creating higher wages and benefits. Those countries who attempt to scathe away the negatives of this transition via socialist policies end up extending the plight of the workers in destitution. What of it?
 
Last edited:
Nowhere in Europe is there any prospect of banning abortion. You know the position in America better that I do - but do you really consider that pro life is in the ascendency? I know you want it to be but is it?

As long as the pro abortion groups continue to eliminate their offspring and genes from the population it will be.

The secret is to keep it a legal and safe procedure for those families who find themselves in the unfortunate position of having to agonize over the decision, and then to educate the population to a point where abortion is no longer an 'industry'.

The technology isn't going to go away, but the industrialization of it is enough to break a Monkeys heart.


After that's accomplished, educate the population to the point where abortion is no longer necessary.




Education. :thup:
 
Of course I equate Marx to totalitarianism. It is the only way to achieve his "healthy" society. You see, Marxism is the antithesis of human nature. So, as human nature seems to be the barrier, you must use force to get everyone "walking in the same healthy direction." Modern Marxists have abandoned Marx. Why? Because Marx was dead wrong about how a communist society would come about.

"Modern Marxists have abandoned Marx"? Really? So what makes them Marxists?

You missed my point by a mile. The Red Scare has become a running theme on this message board, I suggest you read my post again and then some history, with particular attention to the plight of the average person living in the period known as the Gilded Age up to the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935.

Then consider the post WWII economic boom followed by the failure of Voodoo Economics and today, the era of blame.

In one respect you are right. Economic 'theory', be it Marxist or Supply Side, which does not take into account human nature is nothing more than a postulate.

Gilded Age was a natural transition into an national industrial economy. There is no country that does not see this transition at one time or another. Once unemployment becomes low the demand for labor goes up and the market levels off, creating higher wages and benefits. Those countries who attempt to scathe away the negatives of this transition via socialist policies end up extending the plight of the workers in destitution. What of it?

This "natural transition", did it include Pinkerton Detectives or was their influence unnatural? How about scabs, natural or not? How about trusts and monopolies, natural or not?
 
"Offset"?


Fertility rates among American women are below replacement levels. The only reason we are not YET facing the demographic consequences that most other industrialized nations are is our relatively high levels of immigration.
bullshit:

Fact Sheet: The Decline in U.S. Fertility



What "bullshit"?
women have less children when time are bad....the demographic you used is for white children...




 
Last edited:
A staggering 100,000 Christians are killed annually because of their faith, anti-Christian violence is on the rise in countries like Pakistan, Nigeria and Egypt.

"Credible research has reached the shocking conclusion that an estimate of more than 100,000 Christians are violently killed because of their faith every year.
payback's a bitch...
 
Last edited:
she does not understand what you are talking about. it is way above her abilities to comprehend
speaking of lacking in abilities, this "she" is a he....just like the word is male and not female....:lol::lol:

a tranny? :eek:

where is Steve? :lol:

the word IS a female :D

and you are still a moron, no matter what gender confusion is now on your plate
Saint Brad
XXXX let's not post email addresses. (Mod edit)

can't speak for the word but but I'm no tranny or even gay..
the only confusion here is yours or you have a real problem with gender identification...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
America is no exception. Many Muslim and Sikh temples are burned and their pilgrims murdered here in the U.S.. The Jews, Catholics and Mormons are mistreated by the holier than thou evangelicals. The "my God is better than your god" mentality is ramped in America. It's taking over politics now. Freedom of religion is only for those that capitulate to the evangelicals.

Nonsense. The conclusion is absurd.

Evangelicals don't spend five seconds worrying about Jews, Mormons or Catholics.

And there's idiots in every group. We, the Christians are no exception. But as a general rule, Christianity saves far more people than are killed or otherwise harmed by those professing to be Christian.

Same with Judaism and most other religions, but which cannot be said by Islam, which is a political cult more than a religion.
 
speaking of lacking in abilities, this "she" is a he....just like the word is male and not female....:lol::lol:

a tranny? :eek:

where is Steve? :lol:

the word IS a female :D

and you are still a moron, no matter what gender confusion is now on your plate
Saint Brad
XXXX let's not post email addresses. (Mod edit)

can't speak for the word but but I'm no tranny or even gay..
the only confusion here is yours or you have a real problem with gender identification...

only a plain minded gullible atheist like you will believe that the person posting and person's name on some email are absolutely, 100% the same person.


let me explain to you, "bronze age monk" delusional - there can be more people than just one brad in that congregation :D

she used the female endings when she just started.

plus there might be several people posting under one logo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
America is no exception. Many Muslim and Sikh temples are burned and their pilgrims murdered here in the U.S.. The Jews, Catholics and Mormons are mistreated by the holier than thou evangelicals. The "my God is better than your god" mentality is ramped in America. It's taking over politics now. Freedom of religion is only for those that capitulate to the evangelicals.

Nonsense. The conclusion is absurd.

Evangelicals don't spend five seconds worrying about Jews, Mormons or Catholics.

And there's idiots in every group. We, the Christians are no exception. But as a general rule, Christianity saves far more people than are killed or otherwise harmed by those professing to be Christian.

Same with Judaism and most other religions, but which cannot be said by Islam, which is a political cult more than a religion.

First of all it is simply a LIE.
 
a tranny? :eek:

where is Steve? :lol:

the word IS a female :D

and you are still a moron, no matter what gender confusion is now on your plate
Saint Brad
XXXX let's not post email addresses. (Mod edit)

can't speak for the word but but I'm no tranny or even gay..
the only confusion here is yours or you have a real problem with gender identification...

only a plain minded gullible atheist like you will believe that the person posting and person's name on some email are absolutely, 100% the same person.


let me explain to you, "bronze age monk" delusional - there can be more people than just one brad in that congregation :D

she used the female endings when she just started.

plus there might be several people posting under one logo.
erroneous speculation.
saint brad is the word..
he, BRAD does, not as far as I know speak Spanish.. so your bullshit about feminine endings is a dodge to get around admitting you're wrong..

Modern English is not considered to have grammatical gender..
so unless you learned English from a very old book or lived in 16th century you're talikng out your ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/relig...on-it-s-dry-in-campbell-ca-2.html#post8437504
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Saint Brad
XXXX let's not post email addresses. (Mod edit)

can't speak for the word but but I'm no tranny or even gay..
the only confusion here is yours or you have a real problem with gender identification...

only a plain minded gullible atheist like you will believe that the person posting and person's name on some email are absolutely, 100% the same person.


let me explain to you, "bronze age monk" delusional - there can be more people than just one brad in that congregation :D

she used the female endings when she just started.

plus there might be several people posting under one logo.
erroneous speculation.
saint brad is the word..
he, BRAD does, not as far as I know speak Spanish.. so your bullshit about feminine endings is a dodge to get around admitting you're wrong..

Modern English is not considered to have grammatical gender..
so unless you learned English from a very old book or lived in 16th century you're talikng out your ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/relig...on-it-s-dry-in-campbell-ca-2.html#post8437504

erroneous speculation - there is no proof brad is the word.

modern English has the constructions like "she" "he" "her" his" etc which are pretty telling.

but being anencephalic as you are does not help to understand this simple concept.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
only a plain minded gullible atheist like you will believe that the person posting and person's name on some email are absolutely, 100% the same person.


let me explain to you, "bronze age monk" delusional - there can be more people than just one brad in that congregation :D

she used the female endings when she just started.

plus there might be several people posting under one logo.
erroneous speculation.
saint brad is the word..
he, BRAD does, not as far as I know speak Spanish.. so your bullshit about feminine endings is a dodge to get around admitting you're wrong..




Modern English is not considered to have grammatical gender..
so unless you learned English from a very old book or lived in 16th century you're talikng out your ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/relig...on-it-s-dry-in-campbell-ca-2.html#post8437504

erroneous speculation - there is no proof brad is the word.

modern English has the constructions like "she" "he" "her" his" etc which are pretty telling.

but being anencephalic as you are does not help to understand this simple concept.
false ....I do have proof and it's been shown to you.
the constructions are meaningless, they are telling in so much as they prove your massive ego prevents you from admitting you fucked up.
all your fit pitching and whining do not change anything.
I know you're wrong and that what's important.


"That's okay. I don't mind if this person thinks I'm a female." -aka the word or saint brad..
 
Last edited:
"Modern Marxists have abandoned Marx"? Really? So what makes them Marxists?

You missed my point by a mile. The Red Scare has become a running theme on this message board, I suggest you read my post again and then some history, with particular attention to the plight of the average person living in the period known as the Gilded Age up to the passage of the Wagner Act in 1935.

Then consider the post WWII economic boom followed by the failure of Voodoo Economics and today, the era of blame.

In one respect you are right. Economic 'theory', be it Marxist or Supply Side, which does not take into account human nature is nothing more than a postulate.

Gilded Age was a natural transition into an national industrial economy. There is no country that does not see this transition at one time or another. Once unemployment becomes low the demand for labor goes up and the market levels off, creating higher wages and benefits. Those countries who attempt to scathe away the negatives of this transition via socialist policies end up extending the plight of the workers in destitution. What of it?

This "natural transition", did it include Pinkerton Detectives or was their influence unnatural? How about scabs, natural or not? How about trusts and monopolies, natural or not?

You give me a specific example and I will show how what you advocate for increases it's propensity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top