Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution and as the chief Executive exercising his lawful authority under UN agreement. To lawfully acknowledge the AUTHORITY OF THE CONVENTION and bind the US to it, the Senate would have to follow Article II, § II, Clause 2 and ratify the CONVENTION by at least a 2/3rds majority AFTER the UN received the Instrument of Ratification!you forget that liberals consider the Constitution invalid, in their eyes it has been revoked.Climate Change "treaties" are meaningless anyway.
Not the point.. Treaties MUST be ratified by 2/3rd's of the Senate-
No, I didn't forget that.. just making certain everyone understands that the boy king USURPED the US Constitution AGAIN.
When Obama signed the CONVENTION, he did not crate an Executive Order as you claimed in your post #8. He was following the Constitution as POTUS and our agreement to the UN protocols. You are fundamentally, and thoroughly in error asserting Obama usurped the Constitution!
In your post #19 you make the claim that you're a "Constitutionalist". You're going to have to do some work there! And don't try to out curse or insult me...I was Navy trained!
Your ignorance of the Convention on Climate Control, about which was the basis of this thread YOU FUCKING STARTED you dumb ass bitch, is beyond comprehension or comparison! It was their respective Instruments of Ratification of the UN Convention on Climate Control that the US and China submitted to the UN and their separate ratifications of the Convention that took place, and that your WT "source" tried to disguise as something it wasn't!Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution and as the chief Executive exercising his lawful authority under UN agreement. To lawfully acknowledge the AUTHORITY OF THE CONVENTION and bind the US to it, the Senate would have to follow Article II, § II, Clause 2 and ratify the CONVENTION by at least a 2/3rds majority AFTER the UN received the Instrument of Ratification!you forget that liberals consider the Constitution invalid, in their eyes it has been revoked.Climate Change "treaties" are meaningless anyway.
Not the point.. Treaties MUST be ratified by 2/3rd's of the Senate-
No, I didn't forget that.. just making certain everyone understands that the boy king USURPED the US Constitution AGAIN.
When Obama signed the CONVENTION, he did not crate an Executive Order as you claimed in your post #8. He was following the Constitution as POTUS and our agreement to the UN protocols. You are fundamentally, and thoroughly in error asserting Obama usurped the Constitution!
In your post #19 you make the claim that you're a "Constitutionalist". You're going to have to do some work there! And don't try to out curse or insult me...I was Navy trained!
WTF speak proper english you fucking dingbat.. Navy trained?? As in Old Navy the Dept Store?? WTF are you even spewing about?! WHAT UN CONVENTION?! Are you fucking daft?
Im just guessing here, and please, feel free to correct me if Im wrong, butYour ignorance of the Convention on Climate Control, about which was the basis of this thread YOU FUCKING STARTED you dumb ass bitch, is beyond comprehension or comparison! It was their respective Instruments of Ratification of the UN Convention on Climate Control that the US and China submitted to the UN and their separate ratifications of the Convention that took place, and that your WT "source" tried to disguise as something it wasn't!Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution and as the chief Executive exercising his lawful authority under UN agreement. To lawfully acknowledge the AUTHORITY OF THE CONVENTION and bind the US to it, the Senate would have to follow Article II, § II, Clause 2 and ratify the CONVENTION by at least a 2/3rds majority AFTER the UN received the Instrument of Ratification!you forget that liberals consider the Constitution invalid, in their eyes it has been revoked.Not the point.. Treaties MUST be ratified by 2/3rd's of the Senate-
No, I didn't forget that.. just making certain everyone understands that the boy king USURPED the US Constitution AGAIN.
When Obama signed the CONVENTION, he did not crate an Executive Order as you claimed in your post #8. He was following the Constitution as POTUS and our agreement to the UN protocols. You are fundamentally, and thoroughly in error asserting Obama usurped the Constitution!
In your post #19 you make the claim that you're a "Constitutionalist". You're going to have to do some work there! And don't try to out curse or insult me...I was Navy trained!
WTF speak proper english you fucking dingbat.. Navy trained?? As in Old Navy the Dept Store?? WTF are you even spewing about?! WHAT UN CONVENTION?! Are you fucking daft?
There was no Executive Order signed as you claimed in your post #8! Contrary to your boast in your post #19 about being a Constitutionalist, you are ignorant of even the most pedestrian passages of the Constitution concerning the duties of the POTUS regarding treaties with other Nations! You're bloody fucking uninformed, you shit for brains!
When you started this thread using the Washington Times as a source without questioning the authenticity of the article and failing to validate the horseshit they tried to pass off as "news", you displayed your partisanship, your laziness and your gullibility being drawn into parroting blatant propaganda you bloody, bloody fool! Keep drinking the piss you seem to enjoy so much, you dumb ass bitch!
Completely unconstitutional, of course. The President doesn't have that power. Only the Senate can ratify a treaty.Obama, Chinese president ratify climate-change agreement
Deliberately sidestepping Congress, President Obama formally entered the U.S. into an international climate-change agreement Saturday with China and dozens of other nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Were you about to point out where in the Constitution it says the President can do this?Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution
Obama, Chinese president ratify climate-change agreement
Deliberately sidestepping Congress, President Obama formally entered the U.S. into an international climate-change agreement Saturday with China and dozens of other nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Because being BIATCH slapped TWICE already by the United States Supreme Court wasn't enough for this mother fucker.. You can use your girly pen to sign shit, shove it up your own ass in perpetual glee... it won't matter.. Again, you will be slapped back in to place.. Fascists like you should be buried in a wall of glass... take your fucked up lemmings with you..
Here shit for brains! Look up this passage in you copy of the Constitution in Article II:Were you about to point out where in the Constitution it says the President can do this?Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution
Can't find it in my copy....
Obama, Chinese president ratify climate-change agreement
Deliberately sidestepping Congress, President Obama formally entered the U.S. into an international climate-change agreement Saturday with China and dozens of other nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Because being BIATCH slapped TWICE already by the United States Supreme Court wasn't enough for this mother fucker.. You can use your girly pen to sign shit, shove it up your own ass in perpetual glee... it won't matter.. Again, you will be slapped back in to place.. Fascists like you should be buried in a wall of glass... take your fucked up lemmings with you..
Ahhhh....the race card.....you lose....Obama, Chinese president ratify climate-change agreement
Deliberately sidestepping Congress, President Obama formally entered the U.S. into an international climate-change agreement Saturday with China and dozens of other nations to limit greenhouse gas emissions.
Because being BIATCH slapped TWICE already by the United States Supreme Court wasn't enough for this mother fucker.. You can use your girly pen to sign shit, shove it up your own ass in perpetual glee... it won't matter.. Again, you will be slapped back in to place.. Fascists like you should be buried in a wall of glass... take your fucked up lemmings with you..
first of all, he's a man. i know that is difficult for bigoted white trash podscum to call a black man.
as for being, as you so classlessly put it "biatch slapped" (no surprises as to the classless lowlife you are)., he's been upheld a lot more often than not. the fact that your rightwingnut loons haven't confirmed a new nominee to the court is your problem. they're already saying they're going to cave on that as soon as they're a lame duck senate.
you're dismissed now....feel free to spew some guttural garbage and be off
Without Senate approval the treaty has no effect.Here shit for brains! Look up this passage in you copy of the Constitution in Article II:Were you about to point out where in the Constitution it says the President can do this?Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution
Can't find it in my copy....
"He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties..."
You and LGS are on par with one another as far as boasting knowledge of our founding Document and being very ignorant of its contents you dumb fuck!!
I can't wait to hear liberals Mooo, scream, meltdown, pee pee themselves the moment Donald Trump uses a pen and begins to pass laws on his own..
No shit! "He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties...! Obviously you had some difficulty understanding my post to another you piggy backed, which contained that very passage from Article II, § 2, Cls.2 of the Constitution.Without Senate approval the treaty has no effect.Here shit for brains! Look up this passage in you copy of the Constitution in Article II:Were you about to point out where in the Constitution it says the President can do this?Bullshit! For the US to ratify that UN CONVENTION, the US President had SIGN THE CONVENTION and deliver the Instrument of Ratification to the UN! That is within the Presidents authority as Chief Executive under the Constitution
Can't find it in my copy....
"He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties..."
You and LGS are on par with one another as far as boasting knowledge of our founding Document and being very ignorant of its contents you dumb fuck!!