Boycott Israel

[P F Tinmore]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

 

[Hollie]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

Have you read the report? Of course not.

You just post from UN Watch which is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Throughout the entire report, the authors of the study make clear that they have applied only one standard to their research: International Law, and explicitly the definitions of apartheid as used by the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Scrutinizing both treaties, it is difficult to find even a single point which does not apply to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians: ethnically-based torture and murder, arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment, curtailment of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly or religion, denial of political, cultural and economic participation, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

Israel Is an Apartheid State (Even if the UN Report Has Been Withdrawn) | Foreign Policy Journal​

 

[Hollie]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

Have you read the report? Of course not.

You just post from UN Watch which is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Throughout the entire report, the authors of the study make clear that they have applied only one standard to their research: International Law, and explicitly the definitions of apartheid as used by the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Scrutinizing both treaties, it is difficult to find even a single point which does not apply to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians: ethnically-based torture and murder, arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment, curtailment of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly or religion, denial of political, cultural and economic participation, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

Israel Is an Apartheid State (Even if the UN Report Has Been Withdrawn) | Foreign Policy Journal​

I found it hilarious that when your reference to Falk was shown to be a laughable joke, you sidestep and dance, hoping to avoid another embarrassing gaffe.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

Have you read the report? Of course not.

You just post from UN Watch which is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Throughout the entire report, the authors of the study make clear that they have applied only one standard to their research: International Law, and explicitly the definitions of apartheid as used by the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Scrutinizing both treaties, it is difficult to find even a single point which does not apply to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians: ethnically-based torture and murder, arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment, curtailment of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly or religion, denial of political, cultural and economic participation, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

Israel Is an Apartheid State (Even if the UN Report Has Been Withdrawn) | Foreign Policy Journal​

I found it hilarious that when your reference to Falk was shown to be a laughable joke, you sidestep and dance, hoping to avoid another embarrassing gaffe.

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

 

[Hollie]

What lies would those be? And she never mentioned Israel's many violations of international law that are the reason for BDS.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'​

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

Have you read the report? Of course not.

You just post from UN Watch which is an Israeli propaganda organization.

Throughout the entire report, the authors of the study make clear that they have applied only one standard to their research: International Law, and explicitly the definitions of apartheid as used by the United Nations and the International Criminal Court. Scrutinizing both treaties, it is difficult to find even a single point which does not apply to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians: ethnically-based torture and murder, arbitrary arrest and illegal imprisonment, curtailment of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, assembly or religion, denial of political, cultural and economic participation, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment “committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them.”

Israel Is an Apartheid State (Even if the UN Report Has Been Withdrawn) | Foreign Policy Journal​

I found it hilarious that when your reference to Falk was shown to be a laughable joke, you sidestep and dance, hoping to avoid another embarrassing gaffe.

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

Actually, you and Falk share the same conspiracy theory looney toons.

Twoofers are like birds of a feather, no?


Meet Richard Falk, the Iran-loving, Zionist-bashing 9/11 truther who spent six years investigating Israel on behalf of the world’s most prominent intergovernmental organization.

Read more at: No One Does Anti-Israel Bias Quite Like the U.N.

 

[Shusha]

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

 

[louie888]

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

Anyone with any visibility at all, who tells the truth about israel has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism (by racists and anti-Semites).

People are sick of it. It means nothing and his work is irrefutable.

 

[montelatici]

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

He is a highly respected legal scholar who happens to be an American Jew. Only the right-wing Israelis condemn him. He only speaks the truth, and the Zionists can't take the truth.

 

[Hollie]

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

He is a highly respected legal scholar who happens to be an American Jew. Only the right-wing Israelis condemn him. He only speaks the truth, and the Zionists can't take the truth.

Why yes, "twoofers" are always highly respected "scholars".

 

[Shusha]

Only the right-wing Israelis condemn him.

He has been condemned by:

The British Prime Minister (for posting an antisemitic cartoon).
The British Foreign Office multiple times (for endorsing an antisemitic book and writing an antisemitic cover blurb).
Electronic Intifada founder Ali Abunimah
The Palestinian Authority
Ban Ki-Moon
The Canadian government
The US Ambassador

and numerous others.

 

[louie888]

The British Prime Minister (for posting an antisemitic cartoon).
The British Foreign Office multiple times (for endorsing an antisemitic book and writing an antisemitic cover blurb).
Electronic Intifada founder Ali Abunimah
The Palestinian Authority
Ban Ki-Moon
The Canadian government
The US Ambassador

and numerous others.

Source, and as stated...

Anyone with any visibility at all, who tells the truth about israel has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism (by racists and anti-Semites).

People are sick of it. It means nothing and his work is irrefutable.

 

[Hollie]

The British Prime Minister (for posting an antisemitic cartoon).
The British Foreign Office multiple times (for endorsing an antisemitic book and writing an antisemitic cover blurb).
Electronic Intifada founder Ali Abunimah
The Palestinian Authority
Ban Ki-Moon
The Canadian government
The US Ambassador

and numerous others.

Source, and as stated...

Anyone with any visibility at all, who tells the truth about israel has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism (by racists and anti-Semites).

People are sick of it. It means nothing and his work is irrefutable.

Falk's work has made him a public spectacle of ridicule.

 

[louie888]

By racists and anti-Semites...

Who cares? Try refuting his words.

 

[Hollie]

In other news:

BDS Fail: UK Universities Reject Israel Boycott Motions

 

[Hollie]

By racists and anti-Semites...

Who cares? Try refuting his words.

I have no interest in refuting a 9-11 twoofer.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

By an Israeli propaganda organization.

Priceless.

 

[Hollie]

By racists and anti-Semites...

Who cares? Try refuting his words.

Once again, you make outrageous claims that leave you as an object of ridicule.

 

[louie888]

Yet another fine refutation <pointing and giggling>

 

[Hollie]

Richard Falk is a highly respected legal scholar except by Israel and its toadies.

This Richard Falk is "highly respected"?! The one who has been publicly condemned for racism and antisemitism?

By an Israeli propaganda organization.

Priceless.

Actually, Falk has been the subject of condemnation by many and varied individuals and organizations.

It seems your feelings are hurt because both you and him are derided as goofy 9-11,twoofers.