RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Boycott Israel
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, the Canadians have their laws and their dilemmas. And they have the responsibility to defend their nation from all threats (internal and external). This responsibility includes (QED) Criminal Acts directed against Canada with the intention of - or calculated to - intimidate a population and to compel the Canadian government or the general population to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.
You can be such a (words escape me) in your very judgemental assessment of the Canadians. Their action is completely consistent with the United Nations General Assembly Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (A/RES/72/284).
The idea that "they have a hair up their ass" is purely the least objective position you can hold on the disposition of a "former Palestinian Arab terrorist" (if there is such a thing).
.........![• Smaller then Smallest.png • Smaller then Smallest.png](https://www.usmessageboard.com/data/attachments/271/271642-f70afb7c809a1dcff4be918ecc379f4e.jpg)
Most Respectfully,
R
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, the Canadians have their laws and their dilemmas. And they have the responsibility to defend their nation from all threats (internal and external). This responsibility includes (QED) Criminal Acts directed against Canada with the intention of - or calculated to - intimidate a population and to compel the Canadian government or the general population to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.
Annex I - Plan of Action • Section II • Measures Aimed at Addressing Conditions Conducive to the Spread of Terrorism • Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy said:To step-up national efforts and bilateral, sub-regional, regional and international co-operation, as appropriate, to improve border and customs controls, in order to prevent and detect the movement of terrorists and to prevent and detect the illicit traffic in, inter alia, small arms and light weapons, conventional ammunition and explosives, nuclear, chemical, biological or radiological weapons and materials, while recognizing that States may require assistance to that effect.
(COMMENT)So Canada wants to deport a peaceful person just because they have a hair up their ass.
You can be such a (words escape me) in your very judgemental assessment of the Canadians. Their action is completely consistent with the United Nations General Assembly Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (A/RES/72/284).
The "Security Council resolutions 2178 (2014) of 24 September 2014 and Security Council Resolution 2396 (2017) of 21 December 2017, and reaffirms the need to strengthen efforts to address the evolving threat of foreign terrorist fighters."
Resolution 2178 and the definition of foreign terrorist fighters, and expressing grave concernover the acute and growing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters returning or relocating, particularly from conflict zones, → to third countries,
Resolution 2178 and the definition of foreign terrorist fighters, and expressing grave concernover the acute and growing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters returning or relocating, particularly from conflict zones, → to third countries,
The idea that "they have a hair up their ass" is purely the least objective position you can hold on the disposition of a "former Palestinian Arab terrorist" (if there is such a thing).
.........
![• Smaller then Smallest.png • Smaller then Smallest.png](https://www.usmessageboard.com/data/attachments/271/271642-f70afb7c809a1dcff4be918ecc379f4e.jpg)
Most Respectfully,
R
Last edited: