Breaking: 9th Circuit Issues Ruling Not To Protect America's Sovereignty

[AvgGuyIA]

The courts have ruled, end of this story

See you in court.

 

[brummelben]

The courts have ruled, end of this story

See you in court.

What court? Do you have a clue?

 

[basquebromance]

abolish the 9th circuit!

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com

I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...

This gives the GOP great material for the mid terms. The left still cares more about being PC than they do about national security.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

President Trump can declare EVERYTHING covered by National Security if he wants to, he can and will call a National State of Emergency the next time Leftist Maniacs go on the rampage on my betting America will be under Martial Law by this Summer because the Leftist Maniacs are going to keep rioting and there will probably be a terrorist attack.

The terrorist attack will be blamed ENTIRELY on the Leftist Traitors who sit on benches they were not elected to, they'll be scapegoated for letting America be vulnerable and President Trump will use them blocking this particular Executive Order to crucify them with and declare Martial Law.

So either Leftist Maniac rioting or a terrorist attack gives him the reason to declare a National State of Emergency, that's Martial Law and with that he can bypass the American Constitution and do what he needs to do to make Americans safe.

They are playing politics with the safety of the American people, the so-called conservative judges are Cuckservatives and not Conservatives, the other judges are Leftists.

The MSM and Beta Cucks and Leftists insist he's a Fascist, so why not go Fascist, he keeps getting called a Fascist, he might as well just do it.

Where in the Constitution does it say the president can do that?

 

[SYTFE]

"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" - Trump on twitter a moment ago

​

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
Follow

More​

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

• 
  
  
  • RETWEETS20,802​
  • LIKES54,237​
  • ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​

3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply

50K

Retweet

21K

Like

54K

Jesus Christ Hoss, please learn how to use the internet.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

this is a joke. just a joke.

this is a coup. that's what it is. a judicial coup. A COUP!

Stop whining.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Think so?

Let's consult a conservative....

>> The order violates the law. Under the Immigration Act of 1965, the president may not refuse to give visas to immigrants coming to live in the United States permanently due to their nationality. The provision is unequivocal in stating that no person may “be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.” While this does not apply to temporary visitors or refugees, I have previously explained in detail why the president cannot legally enforce this order against immigrants who are sponsored by employers or family members in the United States. << --- Five Reasons Congress Should Repeal Rump's Immigrant/Refugee Ban​

Read the damn law.

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President


Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.


8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Read the damn link. And its sublink:

>> Text of the law bans discrimination based on national origin

At first blush, it would seem that the president can ban people based on their nationality or country of residence. The Supreme Court has granted Congress extensive leeway under the plenary power doctrine to limit immigration based on criteria—such as race or national origin—that would be considered unconstitutional in other contexts, and proponents of Trump’s plan claim that Congress authorized such bans by pointing to a provision of section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the law that controls most U.S. immigration policies:

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.​

This seems to hand unequivocal authority to the executive branch to determine who it may admit to the United States. However, another section of the law clearly bans discrimination against certain classes. Section 202(a)(1)(A) of the INA states that except in cases specified by Congress in section 101(a)(27):

…no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.​

While section 212 grants the president a general power to exclude certain immigrants, section 202 limits this power. <<​

The courts have ruled, end of this story

This is a small step in the process, really. Story's just beginning.

Tell us what comes next?

The appeal.

 

[peabody]

9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com

I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...

This gives the GOP great material for the mid terms. The left still cares more about being PC than they do about national security.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

President Trump can declare EVERYTHING covered by National Security if he wants to, he can and will call a National State of Emergency the next time Leftist Maniacs go on the rampage on my betting America will be under Martial Law by this Summer because the Leftist Maniacs are going to keep rioting and there will probably be a terrorist attack.

The terrorist attack will be blamed ENTIRELY on the Leftist Traitors who sit on benches they were not elected to, they'll be scapegoated for letting America be vulnerable and President Trump will use them blocking this particular Executive Order to crucify them with and declare Martial Law.

So either Leftist Maniac rioting or a terrorist attack gives him the reason to declare a National State of Emergency, that's Martial Law and with that he can bypass the American Constitution and do what he needs to do to make Americans safe.

They are playing politics with the safety of the American people, the so-called conservative judges are Cuckservatives and not Conservatives, the other judges are Leftists.

The MSM and Beta Cucks and Leftists insist he's a Fascist, so why not go Fascist, he keeps getting called a Fascist, he might as well just do it.

You cheered when the buildings fell?

 

[tigerred59]

Welp, we can forget about that wall, grabbing back our jobs from China, and expect for the rest of the year for the Idiot king, to tweet us out of the constitution into Trump country and his way or the highway!! (sigh)

 

[brummelben]

abolish the 9th circuit!

Its far better and easier to abolish you. The court has ruled, deal with it

 

[Pogo]

9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com

I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...

This gives the GOP great material for the mid terms. The left still cares more about being PC than they do about national security.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

President Trump can declare EVERYTHING covered by National Security if he wants to, he can and will call a National State of Emergency the next time Leftist Maniacs go on the rampage on my betting America will be under Martial Law by this Summer because the Leftist Maniacs are going to keep rioting and there will probably be a terrorist attack.

The terrorist attack will be blamed ENTIRELY on the Leftist Traitors who sit on benches they were not elected to, they'll be scapegoated for letting America be vulnerable and President Trump will use them blocking this particular Executive Order to crucify them with and declare Martial Law.

So either Leftist Maniac rioting or a terrorist attack gives him the reason to declare a National State of Emergency, that's Martial Law and with that he can bypass the American Constituion and do what he needs to do to make Americans safe.

They are playing politics with the safety of the American people, the so-called conservative judges are Cuckservatives and not Conservatives, the other judges are Leftists.

The 9/11 hijackers (known in Orange Cheetoland as "7/11") came primarily from Saudi Arabia, with one or two each from Egypt, the UAE and Lebanon. NONE of those countries are on the ban list. Nor is Pakistan, which gave safe harbor to UBL.

Those citizens of those three countries produced 2800 deaths in the US. Citizens of the banned countries produced ---------------- zero.

Try to make a 'safety and security' argument out of that.

 

[basquebromance]

The Washington State AG: "we are a nation of laws." HAHAHAHAHA ...except 8 USC 1182(f), of course

 

[brummelben]

Read the damn law.

(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President


Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.


8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

Read the damn link. And its sublink:

>> Text of the law bans discrimination based on national origin

At first blush, it would seem that the president can ban people based on their nationality or country of residence. The Supreme Court has granted Congress extensive leeway under the plenary power doctrine to limit immigration based on criteria—such as race or national origin—that would be considered unconstitutional in other contexts, and proponents of Trump’s plan claim that Congress authorized such bans by pointing to a provision of section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), the law that controls most U.S. immigration policies:

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.​

This seems to hand unequivocal authority to the executive branch to determine who it may admit to the United States. However, another section of the law clearly bans discrimination against certain classes. Section 202(a)(1)(A) of the INA states that except in cases specified by Congress in section 101(a)(27):

…no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.​

While section 212 grants the president a general power to exclude certain immigrants, section 202 limits this power. <<​

The courts have ruled, end of this story

This is a small step in the process, really. Story's just beginning.

Tell us what comes next?

The appeal.

Appeal to who? Can you tell us

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

what do you expect from the 9th District Court of Traitors
I always believed the court were supposed to protect Americans
Another falsehood.comes to light.

The district court judge and one of the appellate judges were "conservatives". They upheld the law. Now the CIA and/or the FBI can conduct a false flag operation and blame the so-called judges.


.

They are Progressives, appointed by Progressives.

 

[basquebromance]

the Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump. mark my words!

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com

I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...

This gives the GOP great material for the mid terms. The left still cares more about being PC than they do about national security.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

President Trump can declare EVERYTHING covered by National Security if he wants to, he can and will call a National State of Emergency the next time Leftist Maniacs go on the rampage on my betting America will be under Martial Law by this Summer because the Leftist Maniacs are going to keep rioting and there will probably be a terrorist attack.

The terrorist attack will be blamed ENTIRELY on the Leftist Traitors who sit on benches they were not elected to, they'll be scapegoated for letting America be vulnerable and President Trump will use them blocking this particular Executive Order to crucify them with and declare Martial Law.

So either Leftist Maniac rioting or a terrorist attack gives him the reason to declare a National State of Emergency, that's Martial Law and with that he can bypass the American Constitution and do what he needs to do to make Americans safe.

They are playing politics with the safety of the American people, the so-called conservative judges are Cuckservatives and not Conservatives, the other judges are Leftists.

The MSM and Beta Cucks and Leftists insist he's a Fascist, so why not go Fascist, he keeps getting called a Fascist, he might as well just do it.

Where in the Constitution does it say the president can do that?

If he declares a National State of Emergency he can use The Suspension Clause, he can suspend habeas corpus and the whole of America will be under Martial Law and with that the Constitution is just another piece of paper and you have NO RIGHTS and no more elections until Martial Law itself is suspended.

"Where in the Constitution does it say the president can do that?"

Here:

Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

You will have a Police State, but it won't be the police that you see on your streets, it'll be a Militarised Police.

 

[Hossfly]

"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" - Trump on twitter a moment ago

​

Donald J. TrumpVerified account‏@realDonaldTrump
Follow

More​

SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!

• 
  
  
  • RETWEETS20,802​
  • LIKES54,237​
  • ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​
    
    
    ​

3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply

50K

Retweet

21K

Like

54K

what court?

The Court of Appeals and if that doesn't work then the Supreme Court is next.

 

[SYTFE]

Trump thinks being president means he can be dictator.

EHHHHHH WRONG ORANGE SHITLORD!!!

 

[brummelben]

what do you expect from the 9th District Court of Traitors
I always believed the court were supposed to protect Americans
Another falsehood.comes to light.

The district court judge and one of the appellate judges were "conservatives". They upheld the law. Now the CIA and/or the FBI can conduct a false flag operation and blame the so-called judges.


.

They are Progressives, appointed by Progressives.

Doesn't matter, they have ruled, and you aren't going to change their ruling

 

[AvgGuyIA]

What have we learned with this Muslim ban?
We learned which countries Trump does business with.
Curiously none are part of the ban.
Gee imagine that.
If this was Hillary with these conflicts of interest... the republicans would be starting investigations.
Now?
Nothing.
Just another reason why conservatives are the biggest hypocrites on earth.

. Those of us with a brain laugh at your stupidity and lack of facts regarding this ban. Even those two homos and lesbian on the 9th were skeptical of this being a Muslim ban, idiot.