Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article 1 of the Constitution refers to the powers of the legislature, not the executive.Where in the Constitution does it say the president can do that?This gives the GOP great material for the mid terms. The left still cares more about being PC than they do about national security.9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com
I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...
Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
President Trump can declare EVERYTHING covered by National Security if he wants to, he can and will call a National State of Emergency the next time Leftist Maniacs go on the rampage on my betting America will be under Martial Law by this Summer because the Leftist Maniacs are going to keep rioting and there will probably be a terrorist attack.
The terrorist attack will be blamed ENTIRELY on the Leftist Traitors who sit on benches they were not elected to, they'll be scapegoated for letting America be vulnerable and President Trump will use them blocking this particular Executive Order to crucify them with and declare Martial Law.
So either Leftist Maniac rioting or a terrorist attack gives him the reason to declare a National State of Emergency, that's Martial Law and with that he can bypass the American Constitution and do what he needs to do to make Americans safe.
They are playing politics with the safety of the American people, the so-called conservative judges are Cuckservatives and not Conservatives, the other judges are Leftists.
The MSM and Beta Cucks and Leftists insist he's a Fascist, so why not go Fascist, he keeps getting called a Fascist, he might as well just do it.
If he declares a National State of Emergency he can use The Suspension Clause, he can suspend habeas corpus and the whole of America will be under Martial Law and with that the Constitution is just another piece of paper and you have NO RIGHTS and no more elections until Martial Law itself is suspended.
"Where in the Constitution does it say the president can do that?"
Here:
Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
You will have a Police State, but it won't be the police that you see on your streets, it'll be a Militarised Police.
Ex parte Merryman - WikipediaU.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that the authority to suspend habeas corpus lay exclusively with Congress.
No. It will be overturned.Doesn't matter, they have ruled, and you aren't going to change their ruling
Like you have a phyucking clue to what you are talking aboutGorsuch already hates Trump and he will vote against the banThe Court of Appeals and if that doesn't work then the Supreme Court is next.what court?"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" - Trump on twitter a moment agoDonald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
Follow
MoreSEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply
50K
Retweet
21K
Like
54K
Gorsuch calls Trump comments about judges 'disheartening and demoralizing'
Yes that's hearsay from Richard Blumenthal.
Gorsuch doesn't hate President Trump, he will sit in Antonin Scalia's chair and immense pressure will be put on the Beta Cuckservative Anthony Kennedy to have the testicles to side with the Republican side as opposed to sitting on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's lap.
the Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump. mark my words!
Same differenceThey ARE the court of appeals, EinsteinThe Court of Appeals and if that doesn't work then the Supreme Court is next.what court?"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" - Trump on twitter a moment agoDonald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
Follow
MoreSEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply
50K
Retweet
21K
Like
54K
Like you have a phyucking clue to what you are talking aboutGorsuch already hates Trump and he will vote against the banThe Court of Appeals and if that doesn't work then the Supreme Court is next.what court?Donald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
Follow
MoreSEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply
50K
Retweet
21K
Like
54K
Gorsuch calls Trump comments about judges 'disheartening and demoralizing'
Yes that's hearsay from Richard Blumenthal.
Gorsuch doesn't hate President Trump, he will sit in Antonin Scalia's chair and immense pressure will be put on the Beta Cuckservative Anthony Kennedy to have the testicles to side with the Republican side as opposed to sitting on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's lap.
It's not a perfect split, for starters, but even assuming you're right that doesn't change the fact that it's likely to go to the Supreme Court, thus this isn't over.LINK??? Or is that asking too muchBashar Assad admitted some refugees are terrorists. what are we doing?
The supreme court is tied at 4-4. Hows that going to work outYour schtick gets old fast, doesn't it? Common sense says this one is likely to end up at the Supreme Court.Appeal to who? Can you tell usThe appeal.Tell us what comes next?This is a small step in the process, really. Story's just beginning.
An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court seems likely and would put the decision in the hands of a divided court that has a vacancy. Trump's nominee, Neil Gorsuch, could not be confirmed in time to take part in any consideration of the ban.
Moments after the ruling was released, Trump tweeted, "SEE YOU IN COURT," adding that "THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban
Its going to be a long time before the SC choice is confirmedthe Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump. mark my words!
"the Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump."
No the ruling will be 5-4 and straight down party lines. Gorsuch will sit in Antonin Scalia's chair and Anthony Kennedy will vote with Roberts, Alito and Thomas and that's 5-4 in favour of President Trump.
A little crazy in the head are we? Not even Breitbart is denying what he saidGorsuch already hates Trump and he will vote against the banThe Court of Appeals and if that doesn't work then the Supreme Court is next.what court?"SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!" - Trump on twitter a moment agoDonald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
Follow
MoreSEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
3:35 PM - 9 Feb 2017
49,666 replies20,802 retweets54,237 likes
Reply
50K
Retweet
21K
Like
54K
Gorsuch calls Trump comments about judges 'disheartening and demoralizing'
Yes that's hearsay from Richard Blumenthal.
Gorsuch doesn't hate President Trump, he will sit in Antonin Scalia's chair and immense pressure will be put on the Beta Cuckservative Anthony Kennedy to have the testicles to side with the Republican side as opposed to sitting on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's lap.
Long time from nowIt's not a perfect split, for starters, but even assuming you're right that doesn't change the fact that it's likely to go to the Supreme Court, thus this isn't over.LINK??? Or is that asking too muchBashar Assad admitted some refugees are terrorists. what are we doing?
The supreme court is tied at 4-4. Hows that going to work outYour schtick gets old fast, doesn't it? Common sense says this one is likely to end up at the Supreme Court.Appeal to who? Can you tell usThe appeal.Tell us what comes next?
An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court seems likely and would put the decision in the hands of a divided court that has a vacancy. Trump's nominee, Neil Gorsuch, could not be confirmed in time to take part in any consideration of the ban.
Moments after the ruling was released, Trump tweeted, "SEE YOU IN COURT," adding that "THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban
His EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.Our courts are now in charge of foreign policy. Absurd.
Bullshit.
If an EO affects rights the courts must be involved.
We elected a PRESIDENT not a DICTATOR.
.
No, we have 3 branches of government, and the judicial branch has ruled. Deal with itThese judges have transferred national security authority from the executive branch to the judicial branch.
Tyranny
Its still a decision that Trump will have to live with9th Circuit rules against reinstating travel ban - CNNPolitics.com
I know. I know. Fake news website, but still...
OMG, really? The most liberal, most overturned court in the country ruled for the left? Stunning, simply stunning ...
Gorsuch isn't going to be confirmed that quickly.the Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump. mark my words!
"the Supreme Court will rule 8-0 in favor of President Trump."
No the ruling will be 5-4 and straight down party lines. Gorsuch will sit in Antonin Scalia's chair and Anthony Kennedy will vote with Roberts, Alito and Thomas and that's 5-4 in favour of President Trump.
The point is,Trump lostHis EO didn't effect American citizens rights. That's the point.Our courts are now in charge of foreign policy. Absurd.
Bullshit.
If an EO affects rights the courts must be involved.
We elected a PRESIDENT not a DICTATOR.
.
The judges made a decision based on emotion not one of law.
False.
Your request to be banned is utterly rejected. Claiming basquebromance posted a false claim is worthy of a thank you!
Not in this rulingIt's okay, folks. Trump won.
Probably going to be a bit, but that doesn't make anything I said wrong.Long time from nowIt's not a perfect split, for starters, but even assuming you're right that doesn't change the fact that it's likely to go to the Supreme Court, thus this isn't over.LINK??? Or is that asking too muchBashar Assad admitted some refugees are terrorists. what are we doing?
The supreme court is tied at 4-4. Hows that going to work outYour schtick gets old fast, doesn't it? Common sense says this one is likely to end up at the Supreme Court.Appeal to who? Can you tell usThe appeal.
An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court seems likely and would put the decision in the hands of a divided court that has a vacancy. Trump's nominee, Neil Gorsuch, could not be confirmed in time to take part in any consideration of the ban.
Moments after the ruling was released, Trump tweeted, "SEE YOU IN COURT," adding that "THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban
