BoSoxGal
Gold Member
- Jul 1, 2014
- 1,047
- 499
When I was really young I read F. Lee Bailey's book The Defense Never Rests and I was impressed. I didn't have aspirations to go to law school from that age, but definitely it made an impression. I was also very impressed by Vincent Bugliosi's Helter Skelter which I read around the same age - 13, 14. I've been a true crime enthusiast since forever.Again, you misunderstand the nature of prosecutors. I was one, and I know prosecutors from all over this country, including a couple of USAs and many AUSAs. For the most part, they don't WANT to be private/corporate attorneys - they live & breathe the criminal justice system. It's not something that can be compared to the Fortune 500 world and it is absolutely inaccurate to assert that those folks aren't some of the best in their profession.I would strongly disagree with you on that statement; USA is a very prestigious position within the legal profession - being named to such a position is usually a feather in the cap of the very fine attorneys who get the nod. The credential of serving as a USA usually translates to excellent salary potential at biglaw firms as partner or of counsel following resignation at the request of the President - unless the former USA is of age to seek retirement from practice altogether.The rules of private employment don't apply to federal political appointees. Not resigning is not an option for USAs - they SERVE AT THE PLEASURE OF THE PRESIDENT. By law. Period.
Well, that clears up a lot... you basically have no choice in anything when taking that kind of job. No wonder the government doesn't always seem to get the best of the best in their fields of work...they work for private companies instead.
What you suggest is nonsensical when it comes to the whole world of political appointees. Everyone takes the jobs knowing they'll be unemployed when their boss becomes unemployed - but that doesn't mean it's not worth it to serve as a cabinet secretary or ambassador or USA, etc.
No, if you look at your top private attorneys, most didn't work for the government. Those that do work for the government do so because they have political aspirations, not to keep on practicing law.
This isn't just true about attorneys, look at other professions as well, like computer programmers and hackers. If you do find good ones working for the government, it is for a private company that are working for the government as a contractor.
I'm not trying to talk down to you about this, but you didn't find guys like F. Lee Bailey, Bob Kardashian, and Alan Dershowitz. Sure Dershowitz served as a clerk for some U.S. judges, but he wasn't a lawyer doing it. These are just a couple old big names. There are many others like them. Of course it really depends on if you want to be a defense lawyer or a prosecutor. But as I said, many lawyers that do work for the government have political aspirations...
For the record, I was a defense attorney before and after my years as a prosecutor - and I'm very quick to criticize the prosecutorial brethren, as many are political hacks who will let an innocent man rot in jail if it serves their political interests.
But the point I wanted to make in response to your post is that F. Lee Bailey is a disgraced and disbarred attorney, I know very few attorneys who respect Alan Dershowitz anymore as he's become a sell-out media hack, and Robert Kardashian was not a lawyer of any note - he only practiced 10 years and I'm not sure it was even criminal law, he then went into business for 20 years and only reactivated his law license for O.J. Simpson's defense because they were very close friends and O.J. trusted him, so Kardashian acted as an advisor to the legal team to help them manage the giant ego that is O.J.
My point being that notoriety among the lay public for handling a few famous cases and getting in the news does not in any way equate to being a lion of the legal profession.