Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
NEWSBREAKING: Dayton Mass Shooter Was Registered Democrat, Voted In 2 Dem Primaries
Big League Politics can report that Connor Betts, the alleged mass shooter who killed at least 9 people in an entertainment district of Dayton, Ohio earlier today was a registered Democrat who has voted in 7 previous elections, including two Democratic Primaries. Betts was killed during the altercation with police.
Betts was a registered Democrat who, according to information made public by the state of Ohio, voted in two elections. He allegedly murdered 9 people, including his sister Megan Betts, earlier today in Dayton, Ohio.
Fox News reports:
Dayton Deputy Director and Assistant Chief of Police Lt. Col. Matt Carper identified the gunman as 24-year-old Connor Betts. His sister, 22-year-old Megan Betts, was among the nine killed, according to Carper, who added that all of those killed during the rampage were shot in the city’s Oregon District around Fifth Street.
Betts was killed by police less than a minute after he opened fire with a .223-caliber rifle in the streets of the Oregon District around 1 a.m. Sunday in the second U.S. mass shooting in less than 24 hours after at least 20 people were slain in El Paso, Texas.
Latest: UN Plans New Global Censorship Push to Combat "Hate Speech"
The Greene County Board of Elections reveals Betts began voting in 2012, and next voted in the Democratic Party Ohio Primary on March 15 of 2016. After voting in the 2016 General Election, Betts later voted in the 2018 Democratic Party Primary on May 8, 2018. Betts voted in a total of 7 elections, including Democratic Primaries.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ..
Get that spin in early..LOL!Hmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
All left wingers.....El Paso....environmentalist....Dayton shooter, registered democrat....
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth itHow are strict laws working out in Chcago, Baltimore, etc?
Hint; They're not
How have loosening gun laws worked with mass shootings?
Hint: they haven’t.
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
The ones proposing banning all guns are the ones running for President on the democrat ticket, their congressmen and members of the senate...other than them...who else really matters....
The problem is, nothing you guys offer is effective, at all.......name one thing that would have kept these shooters from killing those people...
Gilroy...legally bought the gun, 3 dead
Ohio, legally bought the gun , 9 dead
El Paso, legally bought the gun 20 dead...
Now, you guys want to ban all 18 million Semi-auto rifles for 32 dead.....
A 5 shot, tube fed, pump action shotgun was used to kill 20 people and wound 40 in Russia......
so tell us how it is all about those rifles?
Get that spin in early..LOL!Hmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
All left wingers.....El Paso....environmentalist....Dayton shooter, registered democrat....
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth itHow are strict laws working out in Chcago, Baltimore, etc?
Hint; They're not
How have loosening gun laws worked with mass shootings?
Hint: they haven’t.
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth itHow have loosening gun laws worked with mass shootings?
Hint: they haven’t.
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
The ones proposing banning all guns are the ones running for President on the democrat ticket, their congressmen and members of the senate...other than them...who else really matters....
The problem is, nothing you guys offer is effective, at all.......name one thing that would have kept these shooters from killing those people...
Gilroy...legally bought the gun, 3 dead
Ohio, legally bought the gun , 9 dead
El Paso, legally bought the gun 20 dead...
Now, you guys want to ban all 18 million Semi-auto rifles for 32 dead.....
A 5 shot, tube fed, pump action shotgun was used to kill 20 people and wound 40 in Russia......
so tell us how it is all about those rifles?
Two nines did a helluva job in the VA Tech shooting
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth itHow have loosening gun laws worked with mass shootings?
Hint: they haven’t.
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth it
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
The ones proposing banning all guns are the ones running for President on the democrat ticket, their congressmen and members of the senate...other than them...who else really matters....
The problem is, nothing you guys offer is effective, at all.......name one thing that would have kept these shooters from killing those people...
Gilroy...legally bought the gun, 3 dead
Ohio, legally bought the gun , 9 dead
El Paso, legally bought the gun 20 dead...
Now, you guys want to ban all 18 million Semi-auto rifles for 32 dead.....
A 5 shot, tube fed, pump action shotgun was used to kill 20 people and wound 40 in Russia......
so tell us how it is all about those rifles?
Two nines did a helluva job in the VA Tech shooting
Yes...they want those too...
Prove it.....actually, it's evident you are grasping at straws.Just no racism to see here at all......Sister of Dayton gunman and her boyfriend are found shot dead in a car hours after the 24-year-old opened fire in a crowded bar killing 9 and injuring 27 within ONE MINUTE
Supposedly his sister was white trash who was dating outside her race.
The El Paso shooters racism was based on his extreme environmentalism....dipshit.......he was a green racist......
It's in his manifesto, you moron.... quoted from the manifesto...you moron..
What does the El Paso WalMart killer's manifesto show? - Crime Prevention Research Center
- The El Paso killer is also an environmentalist. His environmentalism is also the basis for his racism and anti-immigrant views:
- “our lifestyle is destroying the environment of our country. The decimation of the environment is creating a massive burden for future generations. Corporations are heading the destruction of our environment by shamelessly overharvesting resources. This has been a problem for decades. . . . Urban sprawl creates inefficient cities which unnecessarily destroys millions of acres of land. . . . Corporations that also like immigration because more people means a bigger market for their products. . . . So the next logical step is to decrease the number of people in America using resources. If we can get rid of enough people, then our way of life can become more sustainable.”
Why have any laws at all?The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth it
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
What law stopped this weekend's shootings? Or what new law would have?
Besides all DemonRATS....YOU meanHmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
You have proof he was a registered Dem? Or a registered anything in fact?NEWSBREAKING: Dayton Mass Shooter Was Registered Democrat, Voted In 2 Dem Primaries
Big League Politics can report that Connor Betts, the alleged mass shooter who killed at least 9 people in an entertainment district of Dayton, Ohio earlier today was a registered Democrat who has voted in 7 previous elections, including two Democratic Primaries. Betts was killed during the altercation with police.
Betts was a registered Democrat who, according to information made public by the state of Ohio, voted in two elections. He allegedly murdered 9 people, including his sister Megan Betts, earlier today in Dayton, Ohio.
Fox News reports:
Dayton Deputy Director and Assistant Chief of Police Lt. Col. Matt Carper identified the gunman as 24-year-old Connor Betts. His sister, 22-year-old Megan Betts, was among the nine killed, according to Carper, who added that all of those killed during the rampage were shot in the city’s Oregon District around Fifth Street.
Betts was killed by police less than a minute after he opened fire with a .223-caliber rifle in the streets of the Oregon District around 1 a.m. Sunday in the second U.S. mass shooting in less than 24 hours after at least 20 people were slain in El Paso, Texas.
Latest: UN Plans New Global Censorship Push to Combat "Hate Speech"
The Greene County Board of Elections reveals Betts began voting in 2012, and next voted in the Democratic Party Ohio Primary on March 15 of 2016. After voting in the 2016 General Election, Betts later voted in the 2018 Democratic Party Primary on May 8, 2018. Betts voted in a total of 7 elections, including Democratic Primaries.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ..
The El Paso Shooter was a racist because of his extreme environmentalism.....the Ohio shooter was a registered democrat...
Anyone seeing a pattern here?
Nope..pure spin..as for El Paso--because he put an enviro message in does not detract from his White nationalist agenda..the parts you leave out. Don't you get tired of slanting and outright lying?Get that spin in early..LOL!Hmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
All left wingers.....El Paso....environmentalist....Dayton shooter, registered democrat....
Not spin, the truth...El Paso.....extreme enviornmentalist blaming immigration for environmental damage.....Ohio shooter democrat....
Because without laws, all the illegals would get a piece of Coyote!!!!Why have any laws at all?The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
What law stopped this weekend's shootings? Or what new law would have?
The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.IF making laws stronger can save just ONE mass shooting it'd be worth itHow are strict laws working out in Chcago, Baltimore, etc?
Hint; They're not
How have loosening gun laws worked with mass shootings?
Hint: they haven’t.
What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
The ones proposing banning all guns are the ones running for President on the democrat ticket, their congressmen and members of the senate...other than them...who else really matters....
The problem is, nothing you guys offer is effective, at all.......name one thing that would have kept these shooters from killing those people...
Gilroy...legally bought the gun, 3 dead
Ohio, legally bought the gun , 9 dead
El Paso, legally bought the gun 20 dead...
Now, you guys want to ban all 18 million Semi-auto rifles for 32 dead.....
A 5 shot, tube fed, pump action shotgun was used to kill 20 people and wound 40 in Russia......
so tell us how it is all about those rifles?
Why have any laws at all?The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.What law would do that, Einstein?
What law that is not already on the books will prevent someone hell bent on getting a gun?
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
What law stopped this weekend's shootings? Or what new law would have?
Pervert.Because without laws, all the illegals would get a piece of Coyote!!!!Why have any laws at all?The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
What law stopped this weekend's shootings? Or what new law would have?
Liar...not that that's news to most of us. Just make it up as you go along, eh? El Paso was one of yours--so was Gilroy..own it....and don't deflect to some tired lie about how since one put an enviro message in with his hatred spewing manifesto about Illegals..that somehow that transformed him into an instant leftist..that shit is so lame!Besides all DemonRATS....YOU meanHmmm..they do seem to have something in common..i just quite put my finger on it..i know..it's the glasses!
Why have any laws at all?The point is no law is 100% effective. So if that is the angle you are going to take, why have any laws at all? After all, despite the laws, we still have murder, rape, robbery and drunk and disorderly.
I realize that the pro gun rights side gets concerned at the thought of any increased regulation and the NRA starts up with “they are going to take all your guns and abolish the second amendment”. Well that is nuts. Very few propose confiscating all guns and the only way to abolish the 2nd Amendment is by amending the Constitution. Considering the vast majority of amendments fail, and the country as a whole is pro some gun rights at the least, it ain’t going to happen.
The only thing this hysteria does is prevent any meaningful conversation on the topic.
Well and good...now answer my question.
Sure. It was already in what I said. No one law will stop it. Same as with other crimes. But each law individually has the ability to reduce some aspect of gun deaths.
What law stopped this weekend's shootings? Or what new law would have?
See your problem is...you can't come out and admit if someone wants a gun they'll get one.
I know for a fact if for some reason I was unable to pass a background check I could buy virtually any gun I want on the black market in less than 24 hours. Guns you'll never confiscate.
Laws do their part on weeding out the obvious crazies but are useless if someone truly wants a gun to do evil.
This is just a brutal fact
