Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Utter bullshit...There are more conservative justices than others, but the voting records of the Republican justices when compared to the Democratic justices shows a semblance of unbiased interpretation of the law vs the Democratic justices always coming to the same conclusions that align with the Democratic Party. The point is that even if all justices can be partisan, the Republicans are clearly far less so.
www.lawgazette.co.uk
It will all be resolved before March 4th and the trial will proceed.Gotta love it. Jack Smith screwed up and non American born Jamaican Judge Chutkan realizes she's got to put the brakes on this fiasco.
BREAKING: Judge Chutkan Pauses Trump DC Case Amid Dispute Over Immunity Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Obama-appointed Judge Tanya Chutkan paused Trump’s January 6 case in DC amid a dispute over the former president’s immunity argument.www.thegatewaypundit.com
And you think the former president can keep highly classified documents in his basement and lie to the DoJ when he’s forced to turn them over.Spoken like a fully indoctrinated fool.
Look, anybody with a lick of common sense knows that foreign companies don't pay millions of dollars to kids of the US VP for nothing. Companies don't pay real money for illusions of access. An innocent person doesn't change his story as evidence surfaces. First Joe says he doesn't have any knowledge of his son's business dealings. As whistleblower's testimony surfaces, his story changes to he wasn't involved in his son's business dealings. Now, as even more information has surfaced, the story, according to Hunter is that his dad had no financial involvement in his business dealings. Normal people don't have 20 shell(meaning no income or business purpose) companies setup to funnel money.
There is much more, but you are blinded by your allegiance.
Utter bullshit...
The Judicial System is famously has a racist bias against blacks...
You are going to have to back your assertion with actual evidence..
Judges presiding over 'institutionally racist' justice system - report
Over half of 373 legal professionals said they witnessed at least one judge acting in a racially biased way.
And you think the former president can keep highly classified documents in his basement and lie to the DoJ when he’s forced to turn them over.
The only difference is I don’t have to make assumptions about it.
Why would I believe he declassified them? There’s no indication he did so.Sure you do. You are presuming that he didn't declassify them when he was in office.
Admittedly, it is presumptuous to think that an innocent man doesn't change his story continuously as evidence against him is overturned. Presumptions like this are used on a daily basis in court rooms across the country to convict people beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why would I believe he declassified them? There’s no indication he did so.
Even if he did, that doesn’t give him a right to obstruct justice and keep the documents in defiance of a grand jury subpoena.
The executive refusing congressional subpoenas is nothing new and has no relation to a private citizen (Trump) obstructing the DoJ. These are far different and it’s totally absurd you try to draw a comparison here.Right, he has no more rights to obstruct justice than this White House does with regards to responding to document requests from a House impeachment inquiry. Lets see how that goes.
Back to ole' Joe. You don't think it is suspicious that he would like about his knowledge of his son's business dealings? You don't think 20 shell companies is suspicious? You don't think his son getting hired by a Ukrainian business that was under investigation while he was VP is suspicious, particularly given that Joe was the special envoy to the Ukraine and bragged about getting the investigator for his son's company fired? None of that is even remotely suspicious to you? This doesn't even touch on Joe and Hunters ties to China and Russia.
The executive refusing congressional subpoenas is nothing new and has no relation to a private citizen (Trump) obstructing the DoJ. These are far different and it’s totally absurd you try to draw a comparison here.
The issue with Shokin being fired would be more suspicious except for the fact that everyone in the State Dept agreed that Shokin was corrupt and needed to be fired. This is a fact that you always seem to neglect. Pretty weird coincidence.
You have only suspicion for Biden. I have evidence against Trump. There’s a pretty big difference.
Great. He lied. I guess. So does Trump. A lot. It’s only nefarious when a Democrat does it.You once again ignore the fact that Biden lied or that Hunter was working for Burisma in the first place. Anyone with a shred of common sense can see that something nefarious was going on with Hunter and Joe. Like I said before, criminal trials are determined on circumstantial evidence on a daily basis. Common sense is akin to "reasonable doubt". The smoke rising from the Biden family is getting higher and higher and at some point even the lefties will have a hard time claiming that any doubt is actually reasonable.
Great. He lied. I guess. So does Trump. A lot. It’s only nefarious when a Democrat does it.
Common sense says that when the entire State Dept wanted Shokin fired, you don’t need to invent a story about a bribe which doesn’t seem to exist.
Hunter was hired because he had the right name.Why did Burisma hire the son of US VP, who was the special envoy to Ukraine? Do you believe it was purely coincidental? If the US was already gung ho about firing Shokin', it seems as though Burisma could have saved the millions they paid Hunter. That begs a bigger question. Hunter took in millions of dollars from foreign entities. What did he do for them? What were they paying for?
apnews.com
Hunter was hired because he had the right name.
AP Interview: Ex-Polish president defends Biden and Burisma
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Aleksander Kwasniewski, a former Polish president who is on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, said Thursday that Hunter Biden was indeed chosen to join its advisory board because of his name.
You think a few million dollars is a big deal to Burisma? It’s not.
It provides legitimacy to Burisma among western powers, same as having the former prime minister of Poland on the board.What does hiring a Biden do for them?
What services did Hunter provide for all the other money he received from foreign entities?
Nothing criminal about sending a proposed slate of alternative electors. It was done before by Hawaiins and no one considered prosecution because there was no crime.That is not what Jack Smith is asking...
Trump was performing his Presidential duties when he was overseeing the fake electors scheme. That has been clearly ruled before. Not everything a President does is apart of his duties as President...
Shooting a political opponent us a crime. Legal maneuvers to challenge an election result is not.So if a President shoots his political opponent, can he be arrested and charged?
His defense is grasping at strawsThey are so anxious to get Trump they jumped the gun before even finding out if he can be charged with anything.
Did they break any laws either in the US or Ukraine by hiring him?What does hiring a Biden do for them?
What services did Hunter provide for all the other money he received from foreign entities?
It is not about POTUS - or anyone else - being "above the law."
If it were a legitimate criminal case, it would be about whether a former president can now be prosecuted for actions he took while president.
For example, when Bush the Younger attacked Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11, there was talk from Democrats that he was really taking vengeance on people who had attempted to assasinate his father. He was compared to Michael Corleone. If they really believed that, they might have come into power and prosecuted Bush for the murders of all the people ho bombed. The question would have been whether a former president can be held criminally responsible for official acts as president.
If the ruling be that he cannot, that would not be him being "above the law." It's a pretty immature way to look at it. It would be about whether a specific official is immune from certain acts, something that applies to many professions. A boxer is not prosecuted for assault if he pummels his opponent to unconsciousness. A surgeon is not charged with murder if he undertakes a risky procedure and the patient dies. There would be no dramatic speech to the jury about a knife-weilding assailant.
But, this is not such a weighty-issued case. This is a bunch of Democrats trying to prosecute a former president for free speech while in office. It has zero validity. It could only fly with a heavily partisan judge, and an incredibly gullible jury. The first normal judge that takes the appeal will toss it out, likely summarily.
On that day, I look forward to the liberal tears cocktails I'll be celebrating with.
Thomas will... Seriously he will probably say Trump is above the law.
If the SC says he is not above the law then Trial goes ahead as normal...
More than a bit ironic that it's his motion that is delaying the trial.Gotta love it. Jack Smith screwed up and non American born Jamaican Judge Chutkan realizes she's got to put the brakes on this fiasco.
BREAKING: Judge Chutkan Pauses Trump DC Case Amid Dispute Over Immunity Argument | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Obama-appointed Judge Tanya Chutkan paused Trump’s January 6 case in DC amid a dispute over the former president’s immunity argument.
