BREAKING: John Durham testifies before House Judiciary Committee: "The FBI was too willing to accept and use politically funded and uncorroborated"

[beagle9]

Uh...there's no indisputable "evidence". Durham wasted 6M dollars on two "convictions" that were tossed. He has ZERO to show for his efforts. That's worse than embarrassing. That's grounds for banishment!

Oh you mean in the still relevant investigation where he now lays out the fact's to the oversight committee ??? Looks like that 6 mil. is still working for we the people.. Great job John Durham.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Oh you mean in the still relevant investigation where he now lays out the fact's to the oversight committee ??? Looks like that 6 mil. is still working for we the people.. Great job John Durham.

LOL. 4+ years. 6MIL spent. 2 "convictions"...no...convictions. Sure...that 6MIL was well spent.

 

[beagle9]

LOL. 4+ years. 6MIL spent. 2 "convictions"...no...convictions. Sure...that 6MIL was well spent.

No comparison to your millions spent on a Russia Russia Russia collusion coup, otherwise that is being revealed for exactly what it was, and y'all hate that.

 

[JoeB131]

Whose the more sinister, you leftist here or Durham ? I think you all have proved to be the most sinister by attacking the messenger's while staying way clear of the messages.

Oh, I think Durham is like every other Special Prosecutor, including Mueller, Starr, Fitzgerald and Walsh. They really can't prove what they were supposed be investigating, more often than not, someone else already investigated it and found no wrongdoing, but they have an unlimited budget and the ability to ruin lives.

But all those other guys were ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET CONVICTIONS.

Let's take Lawrence Walsh. His job was to investigate Iran-Contra. Except that Reagan didn't actually any laws with Iran Contra. It was entirely in his preview to sell weapons to Iran (Actually, we sold them to the Israelis and the Israelis sold them to Iran with our blessing). He prosecuted North and Poindexter and actually got convictions. Except those convictions were thrown out because those guys had already been granted immunity hoping they'd break bad on Reagan! Then he went after Cap Weinberger who was actually AGAINST the scheme to sell the weapons to Iran.

Of course, when Walsh left with very little to show for the millions he spent, he filed a final report accusing Presidents Reagan and Bush of all sorts of wrongdoing.

So Durham got one guy to plead to changing wording on a warrant extension that would have been granted anyway. His prosecution of Sussman failed. His prosecution of the Russian Dude failed. He got nowhere near filing charges against ANYONE at the FBI.

 

[JoeB131]

No comparison to your millions spent on a Russia Russia Russia collusion coup, otherwise that is being revealed for exactly what it was, and y'all hate that.

Except the Russian DID interfere in the 2016 election. That's something you want to actually investigate. It would be negligent not to.

 

[beagle9]

Oh, I think Durham is like every other Special Prosecutor, including Mueller, Starr, Fitzgerald and Walsh. They really can't prove what they were supposed be investigating, more often than not, someone else already investigated it and found no wrongdoing, but they have an unlimited budget and the ability to ruin lives.

But all those other guys were ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET CONVICTIONS.

Let's take Lawrence Walsh. His job was to investigate Iran-Contra. Except that Reagan didn't actually any laws with Iran Contra. It was entirely in his preview to sell weapons to Iran (Actually, we sold them to the Israelis and the Israelis sold them to Iran with our blessing). He prosecuted North and Poindexter and actually got convictions. Except those convictions were thrown out because those guys had already been granted immunity hoping they'd break bad on Reagan! Then he went after Cap Weinberger who was actually AGAINST the scheme to sell the weapons to Iran.

Of course, when Walsh left with very little to show for the millions he spent, he filed a final report accusing Presidents Reagan and Bush of all sorts of wrongdoing.

So Durham got one guy to plead to changing wording on a warrant extension that would have been granted anyway. His prosecution of Sussman failed. His prosecution of the Russian Dude failed. He got nowhere near filing charges against ANYONE at the FBI.

He got the most important aspect of the investigation out to the public, and that was that the FBI aided and a bedded a political candidate in an election, and tried to destroy another political candidate in an election with help of the other institutions that were also willing to go political in their duties

 

[beagle9]

Except the Russian DID interfere in the 2016 election. That's something you want to actually investigate. It would be negligent not to.

Separate issues... One at a time.

 

[task0778]

He got the most important aspect of the investigation out to the public, and that was that the FBI aided and a bedded a political candidate in an election, and tried to destroy another political candidate in an election with help of the other institutions that were also willing to go political in their duties

This is it right here, while what the FBI/DOJ did may not have been illegal or prosecutable, but it sure as hell was not right. You do not go looking for something to charge somebody with if they are your political foe, with insufficient evidence to support an investigation. That is what the Horowitz IG report told us a couple of years ago and that is what Durham confirms. What we have now is a politicized and weaponized FBI/DOJ that is supposed to be impartial and unbiased but they ain't. And no amount of whitewash can cover that up.

 

[JoeB131]

He got the most important aspect of the investigation out to the public, and that was that the FBI aided and a bedded a political candidate in an election, and tried to destroy another political candidate in an election with help of the other institutions that were also willing to go political in their duties

Actually, in his report, he admitted that this was something they should have investigated, just that they were too zealous in doing so.

So no proof of an actual crime, and a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking.

Separate issues... One at a time.

Well, it's really not, if all their "help" was to aid a specific candidate, the next logical question is to ask if he's in cahoots with him.
Especially when he comes right out in public and asks the Russians to engage in political dirty tricks. (i.e. "Russia, if you're listening....")

 

[JoeB131]

This is it right here, while what the FBI/DOJ did may not have been illegal or prosecutable, but it sure as hell was not right. You do not go looking for something to charge somebody with if they are your political foe, with insufficient evidence to support an investigation. That is what the Horowitz IG report told us a couple of years ago and that is what Durham confirms. What we have now is a politicized and weaponized FBI/DOJ that is supposed to be impartial and unbiased but they ain't. And no amount of whitewash can cover that up.

You mean the FBI should just stand by when a political candidate who is manifestly unfit for the office he seeks openly implores Russia to engage in dirty tricks against his opponent?

Let's get real. EVERY President has had to deal with some off the wall accusations. Remember Bill Clinton, and the Clinton Death List, the murder of Vince Foster, and all the money he supposedly made on Whitewater. All of these charges were utter bullshit, but Republicans acted like they were true and Ken Starr spent millions looking into them.

 

[beagle9]

Actually, in his report, he admitted that this was something they should have investigated, just that they were too zealous in doing so.

So no proof of an actual crime, and a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking.


Well, it's really not, if all their "help" was to aid a specific candidate, the next logical question is to ask if he's in cahoots with him.
Especially when he comes right out in public and asks the Russians to engage in political dirty tricks. (i.e. "Russia, if you're listening....")

You trying to use every facetious, and metaphorical thing said in a nothing burger, as if it you want us to believe that it was a literal request, just shows how desperate you on the left have been for years trying to stop Trump.

When he finally cut through all the damned lies and attempted set ups, I ask what did he do to the left that they were so fearful of ? He did nothing but make the country better while fighting off the brainwashed leftist who were sticking to their false narrative created. Narratives that suggested that Donald J.Trump was going to destroy them.

Well guess what - It was all a lie, and it was a ruse being run by the Democrat political class who feared exposure if Trump showed the nation that job's would return, and immigration could be controlled, and veterans could get better treatment, prices would come down, energy independence would flourish, trade would be more fair, government accountability would be more transparent, and our military strength would return.......So yes if him and his family and associates in government could deliver, then of course they were a huge threat to the corrupt elite that had been taking the people for a ride all the way back to Jimmy Carter or before that.

 

[beagle9]

You mean the FBI should just stand by when a political candidate who is manifestly unfit for the office he seeks openly implores Russia to engage in dirty tricks against his opponent?

Let's get real. EVERY President has had to deal with some off the wall accusations. Remember Bill Clinton, and the Clinton Death List, the murder of Vince Foster, and all the money he supposedly made on Whitewater. All of these charges were utter bullshit, but Republicans acted like they were true and Ken Starr spent millions looking into them.

You run that mouth, but can't prove the narrative or accusations you keep leveling against Trump.

 

[JoeB131]

You trying to use every facetious, and metaphorical thing said in a nothing burger, as if it you want us to believe that it was a literal request, just shows how desperate you on the left have been for years trying to stop Trump.

When he finally cut through all the damned lies and attempted set ups, I ask what did he do to the left that they were so fearful of ? He did nothing but make the country better while fighting off the brainwashed leftist who were sticking to their false narrative created. Narratives that suggested that Donald J.Trump was going to destroy them.

I seem to remember it differently.

I remember in 2020, we had riots in the streets, dead bodied being tossed into refrigerated trucks because they didn't have enough room for them in the morgues, double digit inflation and businesses being completely wiped out.

I guess Trump looks good if you give him credit for things he had nothing to do with and ignore all the things he fucked up.

Well guess what - It was all a lie, and it was a ruse being run by the Democrat political class who feared exposure if Trump showed the nation that job's would return, and immigration could be controlled, and veterans could get better treatment, prices would come down, energy independence would flourish, trade would be more fair, government accountability would be more transparent, and our military strength would return.......So yes if him and his family and associates in government could deliver, then of course they were a huge threat to the corrupt elite that had been taking the people for a ride all the way back to Jimmy Carter or before that.

Except..none of those things happened, really. Jobs didn't so much "Return" as the number of Boomers exiting the job market made jobs easier to get. Immigration was still a problem, despite Trump's draconian policies which have probably made inflation worse. (I.E> if you can't get a H1B worker, you have to pay an American more for less qualification).

Trump pushed all the buttons of the bigots, but he really didn't fix, anything.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

... and three trials, two acquittals, and twenty community service hours

 

[0311]

A $10 bill slipped to Schiff and he’ll be glad to phony-up evidence the two holdouts are Russian agents.

You of course have proof to support an unsupported of allegation of Mr. Schiff taking a bribe, as opposed the $2B we know that Jared got the Saudi's? How the dark money Flynn received as an unpaid agent of a foreign government? Or how about the money that Manafart received from Russia in return for handing over Vote Analytics to an intelligence officer of the G.R.U. (Russian Military Intelligence).

 

[0311]

... and three trials, two acquittals, and twenty community service hours

Duh-ham was a crap prosecutor.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Duh-ham was a crap prosecutor.

He is a good Mormon boy. He knew what he could and could not do.

 

[BS Filter]

Oh, I think Durham is like every other Special Prosecutor, including Mueller, Starr, Fitzgerald and Walsh. They really can't prove what they were supposed be investigating, more often than not, someone else already investigated it and found no wrongdoing, but they have an unlimited budget and the ability to ruin lives.

But all those other guys were ACTUALLY ABLE TO GET CONVICTIONS.

Let's take Lawrence Walsh. His job was to investigate Iran-Contra. Except that Reagan didn't actually any laws with Iran Contra. It was entirely in his preview to sell weapons to Iran (Actually, we sold them to the Israelis and the Israelis sold them to Iran with our blessing). He prosecuted North and Poindexter and actually got convictions. Except those convictions were thrown out because those guys had already been granted immunity hoping they'd break bad on Reagan! Then he went after Cap Weinberger who was actually AGAINST the scheme to sell the weapons to Iran.

Of course, when Walsh left with very little to show for the millions he spent, he filed a final report accusing Presidents Reagan and Bush of all sorts of wrongdoing.

So Durham got one guy to plead to changing wording on a warrant extension that would have been granted anyway. His prosecution of Sussman failed. His prosecution of the Russian Dude failed. He got nowhere near filing charges against ANYONE at the FBI.

He proved the FBI is now a politicized arm of the democrat party. You okay with that?

 

[Hollie]

You of course have proof to support an unsupported of allegation of Mr. Schiff taking a bribe, as opposed the $2B we know that Jared got the Saudi's? How the dark money Flynn received as an unpaid agent of a foreign government? Or how about the money that Manafart received from Russia in return for handing over Vote Analytics to an intelligence officer of the G.R.U. (Russian Military Intelligence).

I never claimed Schiff took a bribe. Try paying attention.

It’s hilarious when Dems / Marxists whine and moan about unpaid agents of foreign governments when their hero, Sloppy Joe’s Kid, served as a foreign agent but never registered as one.

Do you think offering Schiff $10 is too much?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

A hoot when MAGA / Fascists whine and moan about paid agents of foreign governments when their boy, Trump's son in law, served as a foreign agent but never registered as one.