XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,692
- 10,520
So you're saying that there is an acceptable number of fatalities?
What a goofball.Where did he say that? Point it out please.......Well, one could infer that logical conclusion when he didn't address issue, but made comment that it wasn't 40.Since you asked nicely....One can infer if one wishes to stretch like a giraffe going for the high branches.......
Do you think he would have killed more or less with a gun?Does that make a differenceYes. Unless you don't see a difference between 4 dead and 40 deadSo, the purpose of gun control is..So, tell me, are you not following the dialogueSo that a lunatic with knives can only kill 4 people instead of using an AK-47 and kill 40 people
or are you unable to comprehend the dialogue
I'd prefer a lunatic who only kills a few people than a lunatic who kills many people.
There is no acceptable amount of death, but less is always better than more.
But go ahead and try to spin whatever word games you're clearly interested in playing.