🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Breaking News On The Russia Investigation

Last night, an insider NSA agent came forth with a shocking bit of news

One thing they know from the hacks into the DNC which were the basis of the Russia-Trump allegations is the SPEED at which the data was removed, and the speed was TOO HIGH TO HAVE OCCURRED OVER THE INTERNET!


No, that's totally wrong. The speeds were easily obtainable.

That's another reason why everyone laughs at the Trump-losers. They manage to be completely wrong on every topic, and then they base idiot conspiracy theories on being totally wrong.
Bullshit. 230 Megabits is not obtainable.
 
Not at all. You just
Got called on your true nature!

Make The Soviet Union Great Again!

300px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png


Lol lying snowflake.

Say did you forget to burn a flag today?

Neglect to throw a rock through a shop window?

Or say a prayer to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un to make Neo Nazi Herr Hildabeast President?

Maybe you could go find a cop to
Spit on Or statue To Tear Down to make you feel better or pepper spray a little girl because you don't like her hat.

That might make you feel better... cuz feelings.....right?.

this is the fourth or fifth thread on this...and a little late, it's been debunked... :D

the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!! :rofl:

1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.

2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.

3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!

READ THIS

The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk


But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.

If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.

This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.

The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

I got to ya! :D truth hurts, eh?
 
:lol: you've been trying since you came on this board to make Russia the great USSR again...it's a fruitless cause, with or without DJT!

Not at all. You just
Got called on your true nature!

Make The Soviet Union Great Again!

300px-Flag_of_the_Soviet_Union.svg.png


Lol lying snowflake.

Say did you forget to burn a flag today?

Neglect to throw a rock through a shop window?

Or say a prayer to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung Un to make Neo Nazi Herr Hildabeast President?

Maybe you could go find a cop to
Spit on Or statue To Tear Down to make you feel better or pepper spray a little girl because you don't like her hat.

That might make you feel better... cuz feelings.....right?.

this is the fourth or fifth thread on this...and a little late, it's been debunked... :D

the assumption by the alleged retired NSA IT guys that the speed was too fast for guciffer to receive the emails on July 5th 2016 over the internet at the time of the transfer... and this is why the Russians could not have done the hacking, they say, unless it was a download from a memory card and the memory card had to come from someone inside the DNC is just utterly ridiculous!!!!!!!!!! :rofl:

1- the memory stick to Guciffer could have come from the Russians who hacked the DNC over the period of 2015 thru 2016.

2. the FBI tried for over a year to warn the DNC they were being hacked.

3. Guciffer is Russian...lying and claiming to be Romanian....but it was noted that he was in Russia....something to do with meta data showing such....anyway, if he was in Russia, the FSB (the new KGB)with internet service speeds faster than our CIA can probably get. in the USA...the download speed of the DNC email files could have taken a nano second to send to Guciffer from the stolen files the FSB had on hand from their thefts earlier in the year!

READ THIS

The Nation Article About the DNC Hack Is Too Incoherent to Even Debunk


But this article is neither conclusive proof nor strong evidence. It’s the extremely long-winded product of a crank, and it’s been getting attention only because it appears in a respected left-wing publication like The Nation. Anyone hoping to read it for careful reporting and clear explanation is going to come away disappointed, however.

If you want to get to the actual claims being made, you’ll have to skip the first 1,000 or so words, which mostly consist of breathtakingly elaborate throat-clearing. (“[H]ouses built on sand and made of cards are bound to collapse, and there can be no surprise that the one resting atop the ‘hack theory,’ as we can call the prevailing wisdom on the DNC events, appears to be in the process of doing so.”) About halfway through, you get to the crux of the article: A report, made by an anonymous analyst calling himself “Forensicator,” on the “metadata” of “locked files” leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0.

This should, already, set off alarm bells: An anonymous analyst is claiming to have analyzed the “metadata” of “locked files” that only this analyst had access to? Still, if I’m understanding it correctly, Lawrence’s central argument (which, again, rests on the belief that Forensicator’s claims about “metadata” are meaningful and correct) is that the initial data transfer from the DNC occurred at speeds impossible via the internet. Instead, he and a few retired intel-community members and some pseudonymous bloggers believe the data was transferred to a USB stick, making the infiltration a leak from someone inside the DNC, not a hack.

The crux of the whole thing — the opening argument — rests on the fact that, according to “metadata,” the data was transferred at about 22 megabytes per second, which Lawrence and Forensicator claim is much too fast to have been undertaken over an internet connection. (Most connection speeds are measured at megabits per second, not megabytes; 22 megabytes per second is 176 megabits per second.) Most households don’t get internet speeds that high, but enterprise operations, like the DNC — or, uh, the FSB — would have access to a higher but certainly not unattainable speed like that.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

I got to ya! :D truth hurts, eh?
 
Unless the Democrats had a russian agent working from the inside, this would seem to suggest the entire DNC Server Affair had to have been an INSIDE JOB.
Yes, it is entirely inconceivable there could be a commie inside the Democratic party...

You people are so retarded, you sound like schizophrenics. Seriously.
Since the Democratic party is commie, I'd say you finally have a valid point.
 
Unless the Democrats had a russian agent working from the inside, this would seem to suggest the entire DNC Server Affair had to have been an INSIDE JOB.
Yes, it is entirely inconceivable there could be a commie inside the Democratic party...

You people are so retarded, you sound like schizophrenics. Seriously.
Since the Democratic party is commie, I'd say you finally have a valid point.
Commie. Lmao. You're sofucked in the head you'd make a prostitute blush.
 
Unless the Democrats had a russian agent working from the inside, this would seem to suggest the entire DNC Server Affair had to have been an INSIDE JOB.
Yes, it is entirely inconceivable there could be a commie inside the Democratic party...

You people are so retarded, you sound like schizophrenics. Seriously.
Since the Democratic party is commie, I'd say you finally have a valid point.
Commie. Lmao. You're sofucked in the head you'd make a prostitute blush.
Quit following me around libtard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top