Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
Alright I can ALMOST buy that but how can she determine its natural causes without EVER seeing his body? Could be MANY MANY things.You can link to her actual words. What I get from the articles are, no one was available in the remote area. She consulted with police and people on the scene to determine he was dead, doesn't take a doctor to know if someone is dead. Espeically someone dead for awhile. The law allows her to pronounce him dead without being there. There would be no reason to travel to the ranch just to confirm he was dead.
She also stated that he was dead because his heart stopped, that is true of everyone who dies.
She talked to the police and there was no sign of a struggle. Without an autopsy there is no way to determine foul play. What she did was proper and allowed the body to be moved. The family has decided not to have an autopsy. I believe this is a case closed.
It is not like they need to call in an "expert" to find microscopic particles of grass on a man's shoes after he walked across grass. You know, like they did with Foster.