Rexx Taylor
Platinum Member
- Jan 6, 2015
- 30,328
- 2,361
whos next? hopefully juan williamsTold ya. I told you this was already in the works. Bingo. I pegged it the same day O'Reilly was attacked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
whos next? hopefully juan williamsTold ya. I told you this was already in the works. Bingo. I pegged it the same day O'Reilly was attacked.
You just don't get it, I'm afraid. Fortunately the kids in their 20's today are starting to get it, and by the time THEY become the old horny sleaze-bags like Trump/Bill-O/Roger-A/Clinton/Cosby there will be way less harassment - they will respect women as much as Scientific Humanists respect women.
No, you don't get it. Bogus claims of sexual harassment are as common as dirt. It's a favored way for women to make money or get revenge against a former boyfriend or a boss that passed them over for promotion.You just don't get it, I'm afraid. Fortunately the kids in their 20's today are starting to get it, and by the time THEY become the old horny sleaze-bags like Trump/Bill-O/Roger-A/Clinton/Cosby there will be way less harassment - they will respect women as much as Scientific Humanists respect women.YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Time to leave the 1950's, my friend, and come into the 21st century.
If your "problem" is realty I can't help you.....I grew up in the 50's and nothing between men and women has changed other than the number of lawsuits filed by scheming witches who tease a guy into making an advance and then rat him out if he doesn't pay hush money. I been in the Big Leagues....where the hell have you ever been?
Innocent/ethical people don't AGREE TO GAG ORDERS...BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT IN THE FIRST PLACE! Why would I agree to not discuss a false claim against me!?
The Bible teaches you to hate "faggots", but Scientific Humanism teaches you to "love gay, equally". Something to think about.You just don't get it, I'm afraid. Fortunately the kids in their 20's today are starting to get it, and by the time THEY become the old horny sleaze-bags like Trump/Bill-O/Roger-A/Clinton/Cosby there will be way less harassment - they will respect women as much as Scientific Humanists respect women.YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Time to leave the 1950's, my friend, and come into the 21st century.
If your "problem" is realty I can't help you.....I grew up in the 50's and nothing between men and women has changed other than the number of lawsuits filed by scheming witches who tease a guy into making an advance and then rat him out if he doesn't pay hush money. I been in the Big Leagues....where the hell have you ever been?
Whatever man, them faggots just want to bugger them in the wrong hole and not feel guilty about it.
Bovine feces.![]()
I can't be bought.Innocent/ethical people don't AGREE TO GAG ORDERS...BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT IN THE FIRST PLACE! Why would I agree to not discuss a false claim against me!?
Have somebody push a check for several million dollars across a desk at you and get back to us on that.
YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Time to leave the 1950's, my friend, and come into the 21st century.What do the women who Fox hires think is going to happen the way they flash skin and fling their bottle blonde hair around? .......
Fox Noise is still in the '50s, and the dress code for women there:
1. Tight, short, sleeveless dresses hopefully with plunging necklines
2. Stiletto heels
3. Long hair extensions
4. 1.5" false eyelashes and red lipstick
was something the desperate women who want to work at Fox allowed to happen.
But dressing like a Las Vegas cocktail waitress doesn't mean a woman is inviting sexual assault or overtures.
ROFL! Sure you can.I can't be bought.Innocent/ethical people don't AGREE TO GAG ORDERS...BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT IN THE FIRST PLACE! Why would I agree to not discuss a false claim against me!?
Have somebody push a check for several million dollars across a desk at you and get back to us on that.
Not everyone agrees to gag orders. Sometimes they are imposed. The complaint that O'Reilly looked at some woman behind her back isn't credible. Most of these complaints aren't credible. O'Reilly didn't leave because of these bogus complaints. He left because new management made him understand that they were replacing the old guard. He leaves now, or it will get much much worse until he does leave.Innocent/ethical people don't AGREE TO GAG ORDERS...BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT IN THE FIRST PLACE! Why would I agree to not discuss a false claim against me!?He's bound by legal agreements not to discuss these matters, dumbass.Part of the previous settlements is undoubtedly that all parties do not discuss them. So O'Reilly is legally bound not to discuss them. What would you have him shout about?
If O'Reilly was so innocent, he would be shouting it to all who would listen. He would be trying to clear his name, and prove his innocence. But that's kinda hard to do, when one of the ladies he harassed has him on her answering machine, and a tape of Bill-o masking lews sexual comments to her while playing with himself.
I have heard nothing about the stuff you accuse him of. Do you have a link?
But you can't produce it, obviously.Oh it's there, trust me - I've heard it.He's bound by legal agreements not to discuss these matters, dumbass.Part of the previous settlements is undoubtedly that all parties do not discuss them. So O'Reilly is legally bound not to discuss them. What would you have him shout about?
If O'Reilly was so innocent, he would be shouting it to all who would listen. He would be trying to clear his name, and prove his innocence. But that's kinda hard to do, when one of the ladies he harassed has him on her answering machine, and a tape of Bill-o masking lews sexual comments to her while playing with himself.
I have heard nothing about the stuff you accuse him of. Do you have a link?
The Bible teaches you to hate "faggots", but Scientific Humanism teaches you to "love gay, equally". Something to think about.You just don't get it, I'm afraid. Fortunately the kids in their 20's today are starting to get it, and by the time THEY become the old horny sleaze-bags like Trump/Bill-O/Roger-A/Clinton/Cosby there will be way less harassment - they will respect women as much as Scientific Humanists respect women.YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! Time to leave the 1950's, my friend, and come into the 21st century.
If your "problem" is realty I can't help you.....I grew up in the 50's and nothing between men and women has changed other than the number of lawsuits filed by scheming witches who tease a guy into making an advance and then rat him out if he doesn't pay hush money. I been in the Big Leagues....where the hell have you ever been?
Whatever man, them faggots just want to bugger them in the wrong hole and not feel guilty about it.
Bovine feces.![]()
He is legally not allowed to, moron.Part of the previous settlements is undoubtedly that all parties do not discuss them. So O'Reilly is legally bound not to discuss them. What would you have him shout about?
If O'Reilly was so innocent, he would be shouting it to all who would listen. He would be trying to clear his name, and prove his innocence. But that's kinda hard to do, when one of the ladies he harassed has him on her answering machine, and a tape of Bill-o making lewd sexual comments to her while playing with himself.
I can't be bought.
He, by not standing up to the (apparently) false accusers, is PASSING UP millions in future ad revenue that he'd get part of if he was cleared of these (allegedly) false claims. BILL is the one who should not only be standing up for himself (if he's innocent, that is), for his reputation, but to actually make more money - these women have damaged his reputation and his bankability - so even MORE reason to come out with guns blazing against these (allegedly) false accusers. He attacks Hillary way more than he attacks women who falsely accuse him (apparently) of sexual harassment. Bill-O is SCREAMING "GUILTY!", in my opinion. So he's probably a real scumbag. Well, uh, we KNOW he's a scumbag because of this video alone - not someone loving enough to be a Scientific Humanist, sadly:Innocent/ethical people don't AGREE TO GAG ORDERS...BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT IN THE FIRST PLACE! Why would I agree to not discuss a false claim against me!?
Have somebody push a check for several million dollars across a desk to you and get back to us on that.
Yes he is, turd. Him and all his fans. I am not an O'Reilly fan, but this whole thing stinks.O'Reilly is the real victim in all this.![]()
Tucker Carlson or maybe James Rosen. The DNC has been after Rosen for years. It would be big brownie points for the Murdoch boys if they destroy Rosen as an offering.whos next? hopefully juan williamsTold ya. I told you this was already in the works. Bingo. I pegged it the same day O'Reilly was attacked.
No, I don't. As an example, not even the threat of eternal torture and the promise of eternal paradise will get me to dump science and believe that Jesus' magic is real.I can't be bought.
You just haven't heard the right price yet.....everybody has one.