Breaking: Special Counsel Finds Mark Zuckerberg’s Election Money Violated Wisconsin Bribery Laws

Hopefully this news will halt big tech from doing this ever again...hell the way Fakebook and twitter are losing subscribers he may not have the money to throw around in 24....keep telling people to dump Fakebook....its working...
dumped em a year ago. never looked back.
 
Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

They need to issue a warrant for his arrest.
When are they going to arrest him?
 
Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

They need to issue a warrant for his arrest.


Sounds like a shit load of warrants should be issued.

.
 
Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

They need to issue a warrant for his arrest.
Zuckerberg and XI are major buddies---Xi owns Biden....
 
Nearly $9 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. That conclusion represents but one of the many troubling findings detailed in the report submitted today by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

They need to issue a warrant for his arrest.
Calling this dude a special counsel is a little nutty given he has no ability to prosecute anyone.

The change that this accounts to bribery is absolutely absurd. The money did not induce anyone to vote.
 
Do they REALLY want most of their Money to go to the Government??

I don't know how to explain irrational thinking.

You guys are looking at the wrong side of the ledger, consider----------> When you are growing your business, you are all for free enterprise, because that is how you become a player in the business you choose. Once you become the major player in the business, you switch sides.

Why?

Because you want government policies that are expensive to your business, because you can afford the to pay the price, plus hire lawyers. Start ups can NOT afford this. Basically, through government costs, you become a monopoly, because nobody can afford to enter the arena against you. When they do, (think Parlor) they use the government anvil to suppress competition.

Think of it this way------------->government regulations spread over a large quantity of products/users, is much cheaper than someone running a start up trying to condense the costs between far few products/users. This is why for leaders of the very large corporations, the party of regulations is their choice; ergo the Democrats. Trump got rid of regulations, which made him the enemy of monopoly's! The less competition they face, the better for their bottom line. They can charge whatever they want for their data/products, because you have fewer choices to go elsewhere.
 
Wisconsin is a mess. They declare voting methods used in 2020 as unconstitutional, but they refused to throw out the fraudulent votes.
 
You guys are looking at the wrong side of the ledger, consider----------> When you are growing your business, you are all for free enterprise, because that is how you become a player in the business you choose. Once you become the major player in the business, you switch sides.

Why?

Because you want government policies that are expensive to your business, because you can afford the to pay the price, plus hire lawyers. Start ups can NOT afford this. Basically, through government costs, you become a monopoly, because nobody can afford to enter the arena against you. When they do, (think Parlor) they use the government anvil to suppress competition.

Think of it this way------------->government regulations spread over a large quantity of products/users, is much cheaper than someone running a start up trying to condense the costs between far few products/users. This is why for leaders of the very large corporations, the party of regulations is their choice; ergo the Democrats. Trump got rid of regulations, which made him the enemy of monopoly's! The less competition they face, the better for their bottom line. They can charge whatever they want for their data/products, because you have fewer choices to go elsewhere.
Thank You. Does that mean Bezos and others will remain relatively Tax Free in spite of Brandon’s blathering last nite ?
 
Again, if there was no fraud in the election there certainly was no integrity either. Many states are finding laws clearly broken and the bogus results that came from it.

That’s one of the many troubling findings in the report submitted Tuesday by a state-appointed special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly.

Unreliable source.

Subjective, wrongheaded rightwing opinion, fake news, and lies.

“Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.”

 

Forum List

Back
Top