- Mar 3, 2013
- 83,022
- 44,736
Reuters just released an article with additional information.Considering the White House staff leaks information like a sieve, the story may well be true. I don't give a lot of credence to any one story but when you consider the number of stories coming out from different sources, you should consider the possibility that they are at least partially true and certainly not all false news.No, it wasn't. Their photographer, just as the White House photographer was, were there doing a photo op.
Q And I want to also ask about the meeting yesterday between President Trump and the Russian Foreign Minister. Can you walk us through how a photographer from either a Russian state news outlet or the Russian government got into that meeting and got those photographs out?
MS. SANDERS: Yeah. The same way that they would — whoever the President was meeting with when it comes to a foreign minister or a head of state. Both individuals had official photographers in the room. We had an official photographer in the room, as did they.but when you consider the number of stories coming out from different sources
Different?
the ones I've seen all have WaPo as their source
It's also been confirmed by Buzzfeed and The New York Times. Maybe even others by now.
Buzzfeed?
oops
"The disclosures were first reported by the Washington Post, which cited current and former US officials who said the information was considered so sensitive that some details had been withheld from American allies and was restricted within the US government."
NYT?
Oops again
"The Washington Post first reported Mr. Trump’s disclosure."
Lakhota loses again
Trump revealed intelligence secrets to Russians in Oval Office: officials
"One of the officials with knowledge of Trump's meeting with the Russian"
Sure were a lot of 'officials' in that room when Trump 'leaked' that info...
No, by most reports, there were very few
Think it was Tillerson, or McMaster, that leaked the story?