- Jun 12, 2010
- 103,131
- 25,578
Okay racistActually you would, because he is cut from the same cloth as most of you racist are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay racistActually you would, because he is cut from the same cloth as most of you racist are.
And I’m sure you felt the same way about the shooting of Ashlii Babbitt, right?A law-abiding, brave, and capable citizen who steps in to stop a criminal (ESPECIALLY if thug issuing death threats is black) does not stand a chance in a pro-criminal, anti-cop environment such as NYC.
Appels and oranges and bet you can't under why.And I’m sure you felt the same way about the shooting of Ashlii Babbitt, right?
One thing we know. They were both mentally ill.Appels and oranges and bet you can't under why.
I was going to explain the difference to that leftist, but then I realized it would be like trying to teach a pig to sing.Appels and oranges and bet you can't under why.
Deadly force is justified only in the instance of credible fear of imminent bodily harm or loss of life.I was going to explain the difference to that leftist, but then I realized it would be like trying to teach a pig to sing.
The reason the Marine fears he may be put in prison is precisely because NYC is made up of potential jurors like Marener.
One has a record of military service. She did not threaten to kill anyone. She was white.One thing we know. They were both mentally ill.
There was REASONABLE fear of imminent harm or death. They were faced with a deranged criminal who was threatening to kill someone.Deadly force is justified only in the instance of credible fear of imminent bodily harm or loss of life.
I know the law. I don’t work off emotions like conservatives.
Nonsense.You have been cheering and celebrating the loss of a life in this thread over and over.
Ashlii Babbitt’s military history is irrelevant. Self defense claims aren’t based on someone’s military service or prior criminal history.One has a record of military service. She did not threaten to kill anyone. She was white.
The other had a long record of dozens of arrests, including three violent ones in the subway. He said he would kill someone and didn’t care if he went to prison for life. He was black.
The leftists consider the white to have been worse than the black.
It’s the argument for his lawyers to make whether words constitutes an imminent threat of severe harm or death. I don’t think so.There was REASONABLE fear of imminent harm or death. They were faced with a deranged criminal who was threatening to kill someone.
If the criminal had been white, the MArnie would have been hailed as a criminal. But in NY, there is an outright effort to get black thugs back onto the street and allow them to continue their rampage unfettered.
Yup. I shouldn’t have tried to teach a pig to sing. If Ashli had been black, all you Democrats would be screaming how a cop killed another black.Ashlii Babbitt’s military history is irrelevant. Self defense claims aren’t based on someone’s military service or prior criminal history.
Ashlii Babbitt was in the midst of committing a felony.
Well of course YOU don‘t think so. The criminal was black, so you’re looking for ways to excuse him.It’s the argument for his lawyers to make whether words constitutes an imminent threat of severe harm or death. I don’t think so.
A violent mob beating police and breaking down doors does constitute an imminent threat.
So is it your contention that it is legally permissible to kill anyone the second they utter a threat?Yup. I shouldn’t have tried to teach a pig to sing. If Ashli had been black, all you Democrats would be screaming how a cop killed another black.
What the black criminal on the subway was doing was a crime as well. You’re not allowed to go on a subway and threaten to kill people.
You act as though he intended to kill him.So is it your contention that it is legally permissible to kill anyone the second they utter a threat?
The Capitol had been overwhelmed by a mob of violent deranged lunatics who not only had threatened to kill people but also beat some of them to within an inch of their life.Well of course YOU don‘t think so. The criminal was black, so you’re looking for ways to excuse him.
And it’s not a matter of whether words constitute an imminent threat. It’s whether a reasonable person thinks they do, in that circumstance. The fact that the innocent passengers were trapped underground in a tin can with a deranged lunatic threatening to kill one of them contributes to that.
Who threatened to kill people?The Capitol had been overwhelmed by a mob of violent deranged lunatics who not only had threatened to kill people but also beat some of them to within an inch of their life.
Does that also contribute to an imminent threat?
Agree. He didn’t intend to kill him but he did.You act as though he intended to kill him.
But yes, if a man threatens to kill me, I have a right to kill him first. Self-defense.
Hundreds of people in the violent mob. They were literally chanting threats against Mike Pence at one point.Who threatened to kill people?
.Hundreds of people in the violent mob. They were literally chanting threats against Mike Pence at one point.