rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 286,680
- 163,727
- 2,615
- Thread starter
- #361
public safety was jeopardized? by cramming and slowing down traffic?![]()
Yep
![]()
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
I win the argument two
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
public safety was jeopardized? by cramming and slowing down traffic?![]()
Yep
![]()
Jeopardizing public safety for a political agenda
public safety was jeopardized? by cramming and slowing down traffic?![]()
Yep
public safety was jeopardized? by cramming and slowing down traffic?![]()
Yep
So when the president flies into Hawaii, and security for his motorcade slows down H1 from a crawl to a snail trail for the entire afternoon, is he also committing an act of terrorism? Or since he's only there to visit, is it okay to jeopardize everyone's safety, because of course your intent was only to visit?
In other terms, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people because I knew one of them voted for someone different than who I voted for, that would be a horrible act and I would deserve the death penalty.
However, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people only because I had wanted to shoot the gun in that particular direction in the first place, and the fact that there was a crowd of people there was purely incidental, this would be okay, right?
So when the president flies into Hawaii, and security for his motorcade slows down H1 from a crawl to a snail trail for the entire afternoon, is he also committing an act of terrorism? Or since he's only there to visit, is it okay to jeopardize everyone's safety, because of course your intent was only to visit?
In other terms, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people because I knew one of them voted for someone different than who I voted for, that would be a horrible act and I would deserve the death penalty.
However, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people only because I had wanted to shoot the gun in that particular direction in the first place, and the fact that there was a crowd of people there was purely incidental, this would be okay, right?
If the president did it in a deliberate attempt to punish the people of Hawaii, you might have a point
I see your in full partisan idiot mode tonight get back to me if and when you make your way back to rationale.The correct answer is neither. That is simply how Washington works or does not work depending on your point of view the fact you don't like it does not make it terrorism or extortion. Some feel the way Obamacare was pushed through on a party line vote usingBy my count it took about 235 Republicans to shut down the government. Terrorism or extortion?
You make the choice
Parliamentary procedure tricks is terrorism and or extortion as well that also is wrong it is simply another example of how Washington does or does not work.
And some think that the Republican Taliban whimpering about monuments closing down when the shutdown was impacting food programs for the poor was extremism at its worst
I win the argument twoto one
![]()
Very true....
They live in their own little world unconcerned about anything other than their twisted agenda.....
I'm talking Republicans not AlQaeda
You're fucken nuts too.
Republicans are the closest thing we have to an American Taliban
They inflict their twisted dogma on the local population
So when the president flies into Hawaii, and security for his motorcade slows down H1 from a crawl to a snail trail for the entire afternoon, is he also committing an act of terrorism? Or since he's only there to visit, is it okay to jeopardize everyone's safety, because of course your intent was only to visit?
In other terms, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people because I knew one of them voted for someone different than who I voted for, that would be a horrible act and I would deserve the death penalty.
However, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people only because I had wanted to shoot the gun in that particular direction in the first place, and the fact that there was a crowd of people there was purely incidental, this would be okay, right?
If the president did it in a deliberate attempt to punish the people of Hawaii, you might have a point
I see your in full partisan idiot mode tonight get back to me if and when you make your way back to rationale.The correct answer is neither. That is simply how Washington works or does not work depending on your point of view the fact you don't like it does not make it terrorism or extortion. Some feel the way Obamacare was pushed through on a party line vote using
Parliamentary procedure tricks is terrorism and or extortion as well that also is wrong it is simply another example of how Washington does or does not work.
And some think that the Republican Taliban whimpering about monuments closing down when the shutdown was impacting food programs for the poor was extremism at its worst
So when the president flies into Hawaii, and security for his motorcade slows down H1 from a crawl to a snail trail for the entire afternoon, is he also committing an act of terrorism? Or since he's only there to visit, is it okay to jeopardize everyone's safety, because of course your intent was only to visit?
In other terms, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people because I knew one of them voted for someone different than who I voted for, that would be a horrible act and I would deserve the death penalty.
However, if I emptied a clip out of a handgun into a crowd of random people only because I had wanted to shoot the gun in that particular direction in the first place, and the fact that there was a crowd of people there was purely incidental, this would be okay, right?
If the president did it in a deliberate attempt to punish the people of Hawaii, you might have a point
So it's all about intent, then? Gotcha. So if I empty a clip into a crowd of people, as long as I only did it because I wanted to fire my gun and I wasn't actually trying to hurt anyone, that makes it okay, right?
Intent dictates right and wrong. Good to know.
If the president did it in a deliberate attempt to punish the people of Hawaii, you might have a point
So it's all about intent, then? Gotcha. So if I empty a clip into a crowd of people, as long as I only did it because I wanted to fire my gun and I wasn't actually trying to hurt anyone, that makes it okay, right?
Intent dictates right and wrong. Good to know.
Yep
So it's all about intent, then? Gotcha. So if I empty a clip into a crowd of people, as long as I only did it because I wanted to fire my gun and I wasn't actually trying to hurt anyone, that makes it okay, right?
Intent dictates right and wrong. Good to know.
Yep
Wow, thanks for that.
I've heard my pops, who's pretty republican, say that one of the big problems with democrats is that they want to judge potential leaders by their good intent, not by the results they achieve. I was always skeptical when I heard this, I didn't think anybody could be that stupid. I was wrong. I'ma have to let him know I found the Democrat he was talking about lol.
Wow, thanks for that.
I've heard my pops, who's pretty republican, say that one of the big problems with democrats is that they want to judge potential leaders by their good intent, not by the results they achieve. I was always skeptical when I heard this, I didn't think anybody could be that stupid. I was wrong. I'ma have to let him know I found the Democrat he was talking about lol.
Complete ignorance of the American judicial system
Typical of the Taliban
Wow, thanks for that.
I've heard my pops, who's pretty republican, say that one of the big problems with democrats is that they want to judge potential leaders by their good intent, not by the results they achieve. I was always skeptical when I heard this, I didn't think anybody could be that stupid. I was wrong. I'ma have to let him know I found the Democrat he was talking about lol.
Complete ignorance of the American judicial system
Typical of the Taliban
Not a Republican. Thanks for assuming, though
And wtf? Ignorance of the American Justice System? Even in American Justice intent doesn't dictate legality. If you murder someone to make the world a better place, you still get tried for murder, dummy.
On top of that, we weren't talking what's legal or illegal. We were talking about right and wrong. If the American Judicial System decides right and wrong, then you must be all for the Citizens United decision, yes? How could it be wrong if the American Judicial System says its okay?
Holy shit, every time you post you lower the bar. I have to keep adjusting my perceptions to account for the fact that you're way dumber than I gave you credit for.
Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....
So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two
Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same
With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied
In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists
Ever since the bridgegate story broke, Republicans have been trying to deflect with Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi....
So let's look at the similarities and differences between the two
Well, both happened in September, I guess that is the same
With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied
In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists
With Benghazi, Obama claimed it was caused by a anti Islam film.......Republicans claim he lied
With Bridgegate, Christie claimed it was caused by the Mayor of Ft Lee not endorsing him.......Democrats claim he lied
In Benghazi, AlQaeda were the terrorists
In Ft Lee, Republicans were the terrorists