Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
looking at his twitter feed now.And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
You actually trust anything the Washington Post/New York Times prints about Trump? These constant accusations of Trump lying is the classic Semitic trick of accusing your enemy of doing what you yourself do. I can believe people are so gullible.Even if he did, there's the question of whether he should have. Considering Trump's penchant for shooting from the hip, the LESS he says the better, regardless of "authoritay".Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the president have the authority to declassify anything?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the president have the authority to declassify anything?
Well, I did not see the info about the laptops and when I checked the news this morning I saw it at the BBC. That is often the first news source I check in the morning.Camp, there wasn't anything in that article that I didn't hear last night/this a.m. on CNN and Fox. It's still nice to see it all laid out.The point of the thread is that a British-owned media source has printed more detail than US sources about the intelligence spill by the President.
Correction: Pretty much everyone is saying it.Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the president have the authority to declassify anything?
That's right. Just yip along like you've been shown. If the Jews say Trump's a liar, you make sure you run out and say that too.
Couple f interesting bits in itCamp, there wasn't anything in that article that I didn't hear last night/this a.m. on CNN and Fox. It's still nice to see it all laid out.The point of the thread is that a British-owned media source has printed more detail than US sources about the intelligence spill by the President.
I agree with you that the media is crying wolf far too much and they will pay for it. The reason I believe Trump slipped is that the CIA and NSA had to be informed, and because it sounds like something he would inadvertently do when he goes "off script." Hopefully the only damage was that Trump shared information from an ally but the information itself won't be harmful to anyone. The media, including Fox, is talking about the seriousness of mishandling classified information as if he'd spilled seriously secret beans. What I'm not sure of is just how damaging the slip actually was. That seems to be where the overreaction might be coming in.I don't know what to say, except I predicted this. I was worried that Trump would blurt out things he learned in intelligence briefings just because he's a blurter. And a bragger. I am sure that what is being reported is accurate, much as Republicans wish it wasn't.
Hopefully there was no real damage done to anyone in the field. As the BBC article points out, the info about laptop explosives has been public for some time, so the source is probably long gone from Syria.
maybe he did - maybe he didn't. at this point i've not seen proof of it, just accusations and speculations that lead back to the entire laptop ordeal.
i will agree if anyone would do it - he's a likely candidate. but i'll wait for proof from someone who's not railing on him 24x7. when all you do is cry wolf, it really takes away any validity should you ever actually be right.
that's where the left wing media is now. it's all tragedy. it's all horrible. it's all trump. people hear it 24x7 so if something does go wrong/bad it will fall on deaf ears.
And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
The President was not doing anything illegal regardless. He is allowed to declassify anything he wants, whenever he wants.and one big point everyone is overlooking is a precedent set by comey and the liberal crowd.
"did trump intend to do it"? if not, there simply is no crime.
if he did it, then to me he's guilty and we got some serious issues with him. however, now that comey and the liberals have validated "i dind't mean to" as a way out - how can they stop it now? their rules. just someone else using them.
time to redefine this now?
I agree with you that the media is crying wolf far too much and they will pay for it. The reason I believe Trump slipped is that the CIA and NSA had to be informed, and because it sounds like something he would inadvertently do when he goes "off script." Hopefully the only damage was that Trump shared information from an ally but the information itself won't be harmful to anyone. The media, including Fox, is talking about the seriousness of mishandling classified information as if he'd spilled seriously secret beans. What I'm not sure of is just how damaging the slip actually was. That seems to be where the overreaction might be coming in.I don't know what to say, except I predicted this. I was worried that Trump would blurt out things he learned in intelligence briefings just because he's a blurter. And a bragger. I am sure that what is being reported is accurate, much as Republicans wish it wasn't.
Hopefully there was no real damage done to anyone in the field. As the BBC article points out, the info about laptop explosives has been public for some time, so the source is probably long gone from Syria.
maybe he did - maybe he didn't. at this point i've not seen proof of it, just accusations and speculations that lead back to the entire laptop ordeal.
i will agree if anyone would do it - he's a likely candidate. but i'll wait for proof from someone who's not railing on him 24x7. when all you do is cry wolf, it really takes away any validity should you ever actually be right.
that's where the left wing media is now. it's all tragedy. it's all horrible. it's all trump. people hear it 24x7 so if something does go wrong/bad it will fall on deaf ears.
With any luck, this will be a learning experience for the President. He's going to have an entire week to practice being discrete. Maybe the lesson will stick.
The President was not doing anything illegal regardless. He is allowed to declassify anything he wants, whenever he wants.and one big point everyone is overlooking is a precedent set by comey and the liberal crowd.
"did trump intend to do it"? if not, there simply is no crime.
if he did it, then to me he's guilty and we got some serious issues with him. however, now that comey and the liberals have validated "i dind't mean to" as a way out - how can they stop it now? their rules. just someone else using them.
time to redefine this now?
have i posted a link from any of those sites yet?And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
And yet you believe Breitbart, InfoWars, and WND.
looking at his twitter feed now.And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 53m53 minutes ago
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....
great. i'll wait for the facts. when people pre-judge they tend to warp facts to fit their disposition.
but this would remove "intent" if true.
And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?The British media seem more inclined and willing to share new details about the classified and secret information leaked by trump in his uncontrollable need to boost his ego by blabbing, even if it means spilling US intelligence secrets.
bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39931012
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
can you cut and paste the specific tweet?
I can't seem to find it
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 1h1 hour ago
looking at his twitter feed now.And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 53m53 minutes ago
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....
great. i'll wait for the facts. when people pre-judge they tend to warp facts to fit their disposition.
but this would remove "intent" if true.
The information Trump shared came from an ally who had asked that it not be shared to protect their sources. THAT is the problem, not that he doesn't have the right to declassify that info.
Your allies may not share such intel in future because big mouth can't be trusted.
There should be no debate about the President's ability to declassify and share anything. No one is disputing that (or not anyone who knows what they're talking about). It is ALL about "should." Of course, he shouldn't have, without first discussing it with our guys and letting them give a courtesy call to the ally. Hopefully he knows better now.The President was not doing anything illegal regardless. He is allowed to declassify anything he wants, whenever he wants.and one big point everyone is overlooking is a precedent set by comey and the liberal crowd.
"did trump intend to do it"? if not, there simply is no crime.
if he did it, then to me he's guilty and we got some serious issues with him. however, now that comey and the liberals have validated "i dind't mean to" as a way out - how can they stop it now? their rules. just someone else using them.
time to redefine this now?
seeing the debate going on for that in here, but so far i believe this to be true - he can.
should he would be the next question and where regardless the left will go if need be.
about what? trump - russia link?There should be no debate about the President's ability to declassify and share anything. No one is disputing that (or not anyone who knows what they're talking about). It is ALL about "should." Of course, he shouldn't have, without first discussing it with our guys and letting them give a courtesy call to the ally. Hopefully he knows better now.The President was not doing anything illegal regardless. He is allowed to declassify anything he wants, whenever he wants.and one big point everyone is overlooking is a precedent set by comey and the liberal crowd.
"did trump intend to do it"? if not, there simply is no crime.
if he did it, then to me he's guilty and we got some serious issues with him. however, now that comey and the liberals have validated "i dind't mean to" as a way out - how can they stop it now? their rules. just someone else using them.
time to redefine this now?
seeing the debate going on for that in here, but so far i believe this to be true - he can.
should he would be the next question and where regardless the left will go if need be.
I don't know what facts in a ultra-top secret CIA file you think you're ever going to get "evidence" about. What kind of "evidence" would satisfy you?
But Trump has the authority to declassify anything he wants. This is another sick attack on the president by enemies of the United States. Utterly fake news. Donald Trump represented the one chance we had to avoid the catastrophes ahead, and those who are orchestrating those catastrophes will stop at nothing to ensure all their hard work doesn't go down the tubes.I agree with you that the media is crying wolf far too much and they will pay for it. The reason I believe Trump slipped is that the CIA and NSA had to be informed, and because it sounds like something he would inadvertently do when he goes "off script." Hopefully the only damage was that Trump shared information from an ally but the information itself won't be harmful to anyone. The media, including Fox, is talking about the seriousness of mishandling classified information as if he'd spilled seriously secret beans. What I'm not sure of is just how damaging the slip actually was. That seems to be where the overreaction might be coming in.I don't know what to say, except I predicted this. I was worried that Trump would blurt out things he learned in intelligence briefings just because he's a blurter. And a bragger. I am sure that what is being reported is accurate, much as Republicans wish it wasn't.
Hopefully there was no real damage done to anyone in the field. As the BBC article points out, the info about laptop explosives has been public for some time, so the source is probably long gone from Syria.
maybe he did - maybe he didn't. at this point i've not seen proof of it, just accusations and speculations that lead back to the entire laptop ordeal.
i will agree if anyone would do it - he's a likely candidate. but i'll wait for proof from someone who's not railing on him 24x7. when all you do is cry wolf, it really takes away any validity should you ever actually be right.
that's where the left wing media is now. it's all tragedy. it's all horrible. it's all trump. people hear it 24x7 so if something does go wrong/bad it will fall on deaf ears.
With any luck, this will be a learning experience for the President. He's going to have an entire week to practice being discrete. Maybe the lesson will stick.
This is according to whom? The Washington Post?looking at his twitter feed now.And how does 'you are one, too' excuse the President of the United States endangering our intel assets? The subject is a fat senile old orange clown that is doing our nation harm.this the same BBC that trump said was feeding US intelligence and everyone went NO THEY DIDN'T until the press accidentally admitted that did happen, proving trump correct?
THAT brittish media/intel?
trying to keep things straight here.
has he? i've not seen the proof he has yet. just a post story.
when we have proof, holler. when we have "media stories" please. not playing that game until we have proof, not conjecture and opinions parading as news.
No more conjecture. Trump tweeted that he did it just a few minutes ago.
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 53m53 minutes ago
As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....
great. i'll wait for the facts. when people pre-judge they tend to warp facts to fit their disposition.
but this would remove "intent" if true.
The information Trump shared came from an ally who had asked that it not be shared to protect their sources. THAT is the problem, not that he doesn't have the right to declassify that info.
Your allies may not share such intel in future because big mouth can't be trusted.
