Lilah
Diamond Member
- Nov 12, 2012
- 3,378
- 6,545
- 2,085
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
is there something about the word INANIMATE that confuses you?
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
is there something about the word INANIMATE that confuses you?
Your existence.
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
is there something about the word INANIMATE that confuses you?
Your existence.
your response makes no sense-----the issue is the term INANIMATE-----I suggested that it is legal to burn anything which one OWNS---
which is INANIMATE---(meaning not a living thing-----more specifically not a living animal)
what does "YOUR EXISTENCE" have to do with the assertion?
PS a person should be allowed to FLUSH anything that is flushable-----(ie ---safe to flush) which he legally OWNS
Even his little dog?
is there something about the word INANIMATE that confuses you?
Your existence.
your response makes no sense-----the issue is the term INANIMATE-----I suggested that it is legal to burn anything which one OWNS---
which is INANIMATE---(meaning not a living thing-----more specifically not a living animal)
what does "YOUR EXISTENCE" have to do with the assertion?
Your post which I responded to did not include the description of INANIMATE.
Even his little dog?
is there something about the word INANIMATE that confuses you?
Your existence.
your response makes no sense-----the issue is the term INANIMATE-----I suggested that it is legal to burn anything which one OWNS---
which is INANIMATE---(meaning not a living thing-----more specifically not a living animal)
what does "YOUR EXISTENCE" have to do with the assertion?
Your post which I responded to did not include the description of INANIMATE.
oh---that's the danger of jumping into a conversation in the middle
As long as the person is burning a flag they own, I don't like it, but it's acceptable as a form of freedom of speech.
"Burning [the] American Flag...."
...is a form of speech entitled to First Amendment protections.
The flag is a symbol and people have the right to deface it.
"Burning [the] American Flag...."
...is a form of speech entitled to First Amendment protections.
SCOTUS declared that burning the flag is form of speech, and we have to accept that it is? So is yelling "fire" in the theater, but is not allowed.
It was 5-4 decision, one vote away from changing the position, and I hope someday they'll overturn it.
If someone wants to protest the government, it can be done without burning the flag. Is protest somehow stronger if flag is burning? Uhm, no? Only people who hate this country are burning our flag, real American never does it.