Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think it was false, I just don't think they really knew what was going on and made shit up to satisfy the president, and he took bits and pieces from it that served his purpose. He didn't get other countries to do squat, I believe their sources were the same.
What coalition? Of the willing? You mean like Albania and Lithuania? That coalition?? LOL...The 1991 Gulf War - now that was as coalition..
Ok, if Bush misled the U.S people with false intelligence what was the purpose for 1? Second of all how did he also get other countries to say that Saddam had WMD's? Remember your the one's saying that the coalition was non-exstient. Anyone?
I direct your attention to:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm
that illuminates clearly the purpose for Bush's deception.
any questions?
No world intelligence said that Saddam had WMD's how did Bush mislead them, So there was no motive in going to war with Iraq, Bush did it just to do it? Is that what you are saying? What was his purpose??
I'd say they all got their intelligence from the same source. Bush wanted Sadman out for various reasons:
1) Oil
2) Payback for 9-11
3) Sadman was said to have tried to kill his pa
4) (and this reason is more peripheral and a consequence of his actions) Help make his friends rich
You answer the question don't give a post, that's not an answer....
If you are capable of reading, it answers your question completely....
but then, I have no knowledge of your ability to read for comprehension.
It does...#1 America has benefited from Iraq's oil, #2 you have stated there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11, #3 If it was about assination why did he wait until 3 years in office to take action, plus couldn't he just have had Saddam assassinated instead of invading Iraq?
Those are not legitmate answers to the questions...sorry
you obviously did not read the PNAC link.
there is little I can say in the face of such willful ignorance.
"You" haven't answered the question, I didn't ask you to post a weblink. I asked you to answer the question. So, still waiting.....
"You" haven't answered the question, I didn't ask you to post a weblink. I asked you to answer the question. So, still waiting.....
the answer is clearly contained in the website. I cannot write the PNAC agenda any better than they can....
is this a site for the exchange of knowledge or are you merely playing debating games?
The reason Bush invaded Iraq is written clearly in the PNAC statement of purpose.
either read it or ignore it...but quit whining.
I get it you can't answer the questions...
I can and did. now do some reading and then we'll talk some more.
You can't pull the answers out??? Again can't answer the questions.....
Seems funny on #1 that we didn't go in there and start distributing that oil in the U.S. hmmm....funny huh
So as previous liberals have stated there is no connection between 9/11 and Iraq, you are now claiming that there was??
As far as #3 why didn't Bush go into Iraq and take out Saddam before 2003, I mean Saddam defied inspectors for years prior, why wouldn't Bush use that for justification.
Take that and put those reasons in Obamas mouth and his poll #'s would take a sucide dive into hell. As far as the second question, what source would that be?
I refuse to force feed you. If you are incapable of reading things longer than a soundbite, I really have no use for you. get thee to the kiddie's table forthwith.
Can't answer the questions.....LOL Yes.....Anyway I proved my point you have no motive and reason the "World's" intelligence community said Saddam had WMD's...Avoid if you like it just proves your ignorance...LOL
the world's intelligence communities THOUGHT that saddam might have WMD's....
only Bush told us that their existence was an absolute certainty.
Only Bush made the case that Saddam had been in cahoots with Al Qaeda BEFORE 9/11 and therefore was primed to give THEM the WMD's that certainly existed... both the connection and the certainty were LIES and misled us into war.
Answer them correctly the debate is over...but you haven't
Answer them correctly the debate is over...but you haven't
