Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
A child should never be called a prostitute or a criminal, of coarse CFS ( child and family services} gets involved because they are a minor
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
Gays have wanted this law for a long time.
If they aren't in danger, police can do NOTHING. Basically, it legalizes child prostitution. Good intentions, but a bunch of liberal dumbfucks fucked it up. Imagine that..human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Your link is a twisted LIE...
A child will not ever be criminalized under the age of 18, instead they will be a victim of crime..nor will they be called a prostitute..the adult is the criminal..
Try reading up on this crap first..
Hopefully the senate will reject this bullshitThe law said they would help them instead of arrest.God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
But some children will just go about their business because they aren't in "danger" or something..
Looks like you are right Marty!
They fuck up again!
The issue is how can you help someone if you can't force them to be helped? The power of arrest gave them the ability to get them off the Street. Now the best they can do is beg them to come with them.
human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Utter bullshit. This article is a lie.
Yes, they passed a law that forbids the arrest of underage prostitutes. But they can still be taken into custody for their own protection. They are victims, not criminals.
And no where does this legislation make child prostitution legal. That is an outright lie. But then, some scum reporters depend on idiots not doing any research, just screaming sensationalistic lies at the top of their lungs.
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
A child should never be called a prostitute or a criminal, of coarse CFS ( child and family services} gets involved because they are a minor
Hopefully the senate will reject this bullshitThe law said they would help them instead of arrest.God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
But some children will just go about their business because they aren't in "danger" or something..
Looks like you are right Marty!
They fuck up again!
The issue is how can you help someone if you can't force them to be helped? The power of arrest gave them the ability to get them off the Street. Now the best they can do is beg them to come with them.
human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Utter bullshit. This article is a lie.
Yes, they passed a law that forbids the arrest of underage prostitutes. But they can still be taken into custody for their own protection. They are victims, not criminals.
And no where does this legislation make child prostitution legal. That is an outright lie. But then, some scum reporters depend on idiots not doing any research, just screaming sensationalistic lies at the top of their lungs.
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
A child should never be called a prostitute or a criminal, of coarse CFS ( child and family services} gets involved because they are a minor
OK, so you are saying then that underage kids in California can be taken in against there will when NOT charged with a crime. OK, OK, we will accept that. See how easy it is when you use logic!
But, hey, by the way.............does that mean then that any under age rioters can be taken in also? I mean, if they are chanting, blocking traffic, you know, the usual thing such as being a typical pain in the ass! Just checking with ya, want you to be consistent. If they can legally be detained for nothing, then everybody needs to know so when the cops drop the ball, we can point back at them, and you-)
If they are in danger they can be taken in. The actual law says "limited circumstances".God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
But not the child. The child can continue selling herself if she so wishes. I understand the intent, and I agree. However, this bill is some bullshit.If they aren't in danger, police can do NOTHING. Basically, it legalizes child prostitution. Good intentions, but a bunch of liberal dumbfucks fucked it up. Imagine that..human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Your link is a twisted LIE...
A child will not ever be criminalized under the age of 18, instead they will be a victim of crime..nor will they be called a prostitute..the adult is the criminal..
Try reading up on this crap first..
It legalized nothing. The pimp, the john and any other adult involved can be arrested and prosecuted, just like before.
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
Really? Nothing to help? Which do you suppose is more likely to help these children, Child Protective services or Juvenile detention? Which of those locations do you suppose has more chance to help them?
If they are in danger they can be taken in. The actual law says "limited circumstances".God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
But not the child. The child can continue selling herself if she so wishes. I understand the intent, and I agree. However, this bill is some bullshit.If they aren't in danger, police can do NOTHING. Basically, it legalizes child prostitution. Good intentions, but a bunch of liberal dumbfucks fucked it up. Imagine that..human beings, no wonder occupy in Oakland stopped them from doing anything about underage prostitution.....The world would be better off without these sickos.
CA Democrats Usher in 2017 by Making Child Prostitution Legal | RedState
Your link is a twisted LIE...
A child will not ever be criminalized under the age of 18, instead they will be a victim of crime..nor will they be called a prostitute..the adult is the criminal..
Try reading up on this crap first..
It legalized nothing. The pimp, the john and any other adult involved can be arrested and prosecuted, just like before.
God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
If they are in danger they can be taken in. The actual law says "limited circumstances".God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
Sounds like a bill to protect sex traffickers and putting children in harm's way.
Yeah....it's a demoquack law for sure
Just so you know , read my remark...and see how the Redstate twists and lies just like some of the democratic links.
I read the link and I made my summarization from the parts of the bill the site included. It's a stupid law and does nothing to help children being used in sex trafficking.
Really? Nothing to help? Which do you suppose is more likely to help these children, Child Protective services or Juvenile detention? Which of those locations do you suppose has more chance to help them?
LOL @ Child Protection Services....a commie outfit if ever there was one
God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
How does a cop take an unwilling person into custody without arresting them?
God forbid easily influenced children don't get arrested for being manipulated..
The intent may be noble behind this, but the execution, like most progressive plans, is where the issue is.
California Democrats legalize child prostitution
The unintended but predictable consequence of how the real villains — pimps and other traffickers in human misery — will respond to this new law isn't difficult to foresee. Pimping and pandering will still be against the law whether it involves running adult women or young girls. But legalizing child prostitution will only incentivize the increased exploitation of underage girls. Immunity from arrest means law enforcement can't interfere with minors engaging in prostitution — which translates into bigger and better cash flow for the pimps. Simply put, more time on the street and less time in jail means more money for pimps, and more victims for them to exploit.
As Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O'Malley, a national leader on human trafficking issues, told the media, "It just opens up the door for traffickers to use these kids to commit crimes and exploit them even worse." Another prosecutor insightfully observed that if traffickers wrote legislation to protect themselves, it would read like SB 1322.
Arresting them at least got them off the street, even if for a short amount of time, and gave law enforcement some leverage to try to convince obviously coerced people to rat out their pimps or enablers.
Cops can still take them in. They are just not arrested. They get help instead of being raped in county lockup.
How does a cop take an unwilling person into custody without arresting them?
