Calif Shooter Was Banned from Owning Guns

[sealybobo]

What's the big deal if one girl goes in and gets one abortion? It's just one dead fetus.

Your trolling keeps getting more stupid with each post. Too bad you weren't aborted.

You're desperate

A bipartisan group of senators Thursday unveiled legislation to improve background-checks for gun sales, a narrow measure that attempts to address the recent spate of mass shootings.

The bill represents an incremental update to existing law but has the best chance of any effort to pass through Congress in recent years, with the weight of support from senior Senate Republicans behind it and no public opposition from the gun lobby.

The bill, crafted by Sens. John Cornyn, R.-Texas would attempt to better enforce current law and strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check system to ensure all background check information is uploaded.

Because the federal government can't force states to comply with uploading requirements, it creates incentives like grants for states to do so. It also adds accountability measures like withholding political appointees bonuses for agencies that fail to do so. The bill also directs federal funds to ensure that domestic violence crimes are added to the background-check system.

This is the third attempt to fix the background-check reporting system since 1995. The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 provided millions to encourage the states to improve their data sharing. That was preceded by The National Criminal History Improvement Program, the first effort to give the states an incentive to report more records.

“For years agencies and states haven’t complied with the law, failing to upload these critical records without consequence,

This bill aims to help fix what’s become a nationwide, systemic problem so we can better prevent criminals and domestic abusers from obtaining firearms.”

I know this is going over your heads.

Laws so laws are followed! You can’t make this stuff up!

Well states don't have to follow the federal laws so the feds are going to give the states incentive to follow the law. This will save lives. I know you hate that but it's a good thing.

If lives are at stake why isn’t all funding being cut to those states? Because it’s BS.

And do tell us why Leftard dominated Calif is not complying.

We should cut them off for not complying but instead what they are going to do is give them incentivates to comply. You know we don't want to FORCE states to do anything. Then you republicans get all up in arms over it, no pun intended.

 

[sealybobo]

What's the big deal if one girl goes in and gets one abortion? It's just one dead fetus.

Your trolling keeps getting more stupid with each post. Too bad you weren't aborted.

You're desperate

A bipartisan group of senators Thursday unveiled legislation to improve background-checks for gun sales, a narrow measure that attempts to address the recent spate of mass shootings.

The bill represents an incremental update to existing law but has the best chance of any effort to pass through Congress in recent years, with the weight of support from senior Senate Republicans behind it and no public opposition from the gun lobby.

The bill, crafted by Sens. John Cornyn, R.-Texas would attempt to better enforce current law and strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check system to ensure all background check information is uploaded.

Because the federal government can't force states to comply with uploading requirements, it creates incentives like grants for states to do so. It also adds accountability measures like withholding political appointees bonuses for agencies that fail to do so. The bill also directs federal funds to ensure that domestic violence crimes are added to the background-check system.

This is the third attempt to fix the background-check reporting system since 1995. The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 provided millions to encourage the states to improve their data sharing. That was preceded by The National Criminal History Improvement Program, the first effort to give the states an incentive to report more records.

“For years agencies and states haven’t complied with the law, failing to upload these critical records without consequence,

This bill aims to help fix what’s become a nationwide, systemic problem so we can better prevent criminals and domestic abusers from obtaining firearms.”

I know this is going over your heads.

Laws so laws are followed! You can’t make this stuff up!

Well states don't have to follow the federal laws so the feds are going to give the states incentive to follow the law. This will save lives. I know you hate that but it's a good thing.

You just keep denying the truth that criminal behavior does not include following the law. I'll be sure to vote against ole Johnny.

I don't know what you are talking about and you aren't controlling this conversation as much as you want to.

When you write stupid shit like "You just keep denying the truth that criminal behavior does not include following the law" I don't even know what that means. Criminal behavior does not include following the law. I agree with that. But that has nothing to do with the current legislation that's in the works.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Your trolling keeps getting more stupid with each post. Too bad you weren't aborted.

You're desperate

A bipartisan group of senators Thursday unveiled legislation to improve background-checks for gun sales, a narrow measure that attempts to address the recent spate of mass shootings.

The bill represents an incremental update to existing law but has the best chance of any effort to pass through Congress in recent years, with the weight of support from senior Senate Republicans behind it and no public opposition from the gun lobby.

The bill, crafted by Sens. John Cornyn, R.-Texas would attempt to better enforce current law and strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check system to ensure all background check information is uploaded.

Because the federal government can't force states to comply with uploading requirements, it creates incentives like grants for states to do so. It also adds accountability measures like withholding political appointees bonuses for agencies that fail to do so. The bill also directs federal funds to ensure that domestic violence crimes are added to the background-check system.

This is the third attempt to fix the background-check reporting system since 1995. The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 provided millions to encourage the states to improve their data sharing. That was preceded by The National Criminal History Improvement Program, the first effort to give the states an incentive to report more records.

“For years agencies and states haven’t complied with the law, failing to upload these critical records without consequence,

This bill aims to help fix what’s become a nationwide, systemic problem so we can better prevent criminals and domestic abusers from obtaining firearms.”

I know this is going over your heads.

Laws so laws are followed! You can’t make this stuff up!

Well states don't have to follow the federal laws so the feds are going to give the states incentive to follow the law. This will save lives. I know you hate that but it's a good thing.

If lives are at stake why isn’t all funding being cut to those states? Because it’s BS.

And do tell us why Leftard dominated Calif is not complying.

We should cut them off for not complying but instead what they are going to do is give them incentivates to comply. You know we don't want to FORCE states to do anything. Then you republicans get all up in arms over it, no pun intended.

Oh hilarious. Pretty please with a cherry on top when “LIVES ARE AT RISK”!

 

[protectionist]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

 

[protectionist]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 bills were introduced last year BY REPUBLICANS, (Cornyn & Grassley) to block gun sales. Democrats voted them down (on party lines) I wrote an OP on it back then.

4 Guns Bills Fail in Senate; Democrats Trying to Blame Republicans

Senate rejects series of gun measures - CNNPolitics

 

[sealybobo]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

 

[sealybobo]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

I don't have any interest in looking into what you are talking about. Who cares what California did? And I don't know the details and neither do you. All you know is what Rush or Fox told you. Or whatever right wing source is telling you to bring up California. It's like asking me about Al Frankin when I'm talking about Trump's grabbing women's pussies.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

I don't have any interest in looking into what you are talking about. Who cares what California did? And I don't know the details and neither do you. All you know is what Rush or Fox told you. Or whatever right wing source is telling you to bring up California. It's like asking me about Al Frankin when I'm talking about Trump's grabbing women's pussies.

Dufus whines about a law not being passed then says he doesn’t care about what the law is about.

Like I said, the left only care they do SOMETHING, effectiveness is irrelevant.

 

[sealybobo]

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

I don't have any interest in looking into what you are talking about. Who cares what California did? And I don't know the details and neither do you. All you know is what Rush or Fox told you. Or whatever right wing source is telling you to bring up California. It's like asking me about Al Frankin when I'm talking about Trump's grabbing women's pussies.

Dufus whines about a law not being passed then says he doesn’t care about what the law is about.

Like I said, the left only care they do SOMETHING, effectiveness is irrelevant.

I say that too when you idiots say Chicago has tough laws but the worst crimes. Hard to stop the guns from getting in when every other state passes out guns like Halloween candy.

 

[Weatherman2020]

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

I don't have any interest in looking into what you are talking about. Who cares what California did? And I don't know the details and neither do you. All you know is what Rush or Fox told you. Or whatever right wing source is telling you to bring up California. It's like asking me about Al Frankin when I'm talking about Trump's grabbing women's pussies.

Dufus whines about a law not being passed then says he doesn’t care about what the law is about.

Like I said, the left only care they do SOMETHING, effectiveness is irrelevant.

I say that too when you idiots say Chicago has tough laws but the worst crimes. Hard to stop the guns from getting in when every other state passes out guns like Halloween candy.

It’s a Federal database, Dufus.

Why is Democrat controlled Calif not following gun laws?

 

[depotoo]

You weren’t talking about a Republican bill, dear.

And you fail to tell anyone what that proposed bill actually said. There is ample reason, as to how it was written, for it not to be supported, except by those wishing to tear the second amendment apart, piece by piece.

No one can debate a nutter who says laws to enforce laws are required.

Gun-control rivals team up on bill to fix background-check database

What? Fix it? You mean the current system wasn't perfect?

And for how many years were you not willing to even discuss fixing this database system? That's what I thought. Because you were brainwashed to believe any gun legislation was bad. So you wouldn't even look at the flaws with our current system. Well, luckily some Republicans are starting to come around.

improve the national background-check system by increasing how often states and federal agencies report offenses that would legally prohibit individuals from buying a firearm.

Their bill is narrow in its focus, reiterating and reinforcing the requirement that federal agencies report all infractions to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), and creating financial incentives for states to do so as well.

The deficiencies of the NICS database have come into sharp focus since it was revealed that a 2014 domestic violence conviction should have prevented the shooter in this month’s fatal attack on a church in Sutherland Springs, Tex., from buying a firearm. But the Air Force never reported the conviction to the background-check system.

The problem isn’t confined to the military: The NICS database is missing millions of such records, according to an estimate by the National Rifle Association, citing a 2013 report from the National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics that found “at least 25% of felony convictions . . . are not available.”

FIX IT!!!

How many years have Democrats been asking but Republicans were unwilling? So fuck off. We don't need to convince the crazies in your party.

Every gun I have bought since the mid nineties has had no background check of any kind ran on me.

Here's an example of how Republicans refuse to do the right thing

But Congress has had difficulty joining forces around gun-control legislation, even when lawmakers in both parties believe regulation is needed. Last month, in the wake of a mass shooting that killed 58 concertgoers in Las Vegas, Republican and Democratic lawmakers called for a restriction on bump stocks — the attachment that can turn a semiautomatic weapon into a nearly automatic firearm. But the effort to consider a bill has faltered — and an opening Judiciary Committee hearing on the matter has been delayed until December.

You think those Republicans are trying to do away with the second amendment? That's how brainwashed you are. Unable to talk common sense.

 

[depotoo]

You are so full of it. Give it up.

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

 

[depotoo]

Of course you don’t. It would destroy your argument.

Well it's about time you guys start waking up

A bipartisan measure aimed at improving background checks for gun sales has been introduced in the Senate, after a mass shooting in Texas that officials say might have been prevented if the gunman's conviction on assault charges had been flagged in a national database.

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Deal To Tighten Reporting For Gun Purchases

If only you Republicans were willing before all the death that has happened recently.

2 similar bills were introduced BY REPUBLICANS, a few years ago (I wrote an OP on it here).

They were Grassley and Cornyn. Democrats opposed it.

Why did Republicans try to slip something unacceptable in it? Probably.

You haven’t told us why Democrat controlled Calif refuses to enforce the law that would have prevented this shooting.
Oh ya. I forgot. It’s all about getting the only thing between liberty and tyranny out of the hands of law abiding citizens.

I don't have any interest in looking into what you are talking about. Who cares what California did? And I don't know the details and neither do you. All you know is what Rush or Fox told you. Or whatever right wing source is telling you to bring up California. It's like asking me about Al Frankin when I'm talking about Trump's grabbing women's pussies.