Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.
Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...
Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================
It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?
Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?
Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....
One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.
Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....
So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.
Already got you pegged no need to waste anymore time on youWhy would I want to do that? I already retired, and I'm not going back to work for anybody. I have too many hobbies to play with, and too many naps to take.
So you were too afraid to be a cop when you were working now you're an internet bad ass
Keep trying. You'll come up with something eventually.
California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.
Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...
Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================
It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?
Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?
Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....
One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.
Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....
So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.
Who considers if the shooting is necessary, here’s a good idea, stop breaking the law, and if a police man says freeze hands behind your back, fuc*ing do it and shut your dang mouth. It just might help, but blacks can’t keep their mouths shut gotta be thugs,Street rep.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nothing surprises me anymore in my truly crazy state of California.
*****
Nobody likes cops -- except when you need one.
Because so many individuals are totally out of control in this country, COPS ARE A NECESSARY EVIL.
*****
Cops are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
A. They are being damned because they shot Mr. Clark, who refused to stand still with his arms raised.
B. If they had not shot him and the gentleman had run away and killed some innocent person later, then some activists would be screaming: "You cops are responsible for letting him get away and committing a murder!"
This article gives a bit more detail about what the proposed legislation might mean in practical terms: California lawmakers propose legislation restricting when officers can open fire
I'm not sure what the president would have to do with this proposed state law.
California Considering Unprecedented Law Restricting Police Firearm Use | HuffPost
On the heels of police officers shooting a young, unarmed black man to death in Sacramento, California, last month, state lawmakers announced a first-of-its-kind bill on Monday that raises the standard for when officers may open fire.
Obama and Sharpton tried pushing this and we told you sooner or later the cops will lose guns as well... CA. is now starting the trend watch.
And in a way , Obama had the police trained shoot to kill, so did Bush as they militarized the police they went crazy shooting people that shouldn't have been shot ...
Now this is going to be the end result of ............... paying attention to MSM BS cops included.
============================================
It was none other than Al Sharpton (I won’t call him reverend) who suggested recently that the answer to the use of excessive force by local police is to nationalize them – federalize them. If there were any doubt what a bad idea this is, consider its new champion.
So you want to federalize local cops?
Why is everything you post a lie? Changing the rules to allow cops to shoot people only when necessary is a good thing. Why do all these nut bags think anyone is taking guns away from cops?
Dang...... talk about connect the dots issues....
One thing you can always be sure of in life.... when progressive ideas are put into practice more people end up dead. One only need to look at Baltimore after the riots a couple of years ago..... all these engagement restrictions placed on cops by the idiot progressive mayor. The ghetto areas in Baltimore became shooting galleries for bad guys.....who knew no cops were coming to help their victims.
Duh...... no elaboration necessary s0ns....
So you are good with cops shooting people when it isn't necessary? That's all the proposal is. Don't shoot unless necessary.
Who considers if the shooting is necessary, here’s a good idea, stop breaking the law, and if a police man says freeze hands behind your back, fuc*ing do it and shut your dang mouth. It just might help, but blacks can’t keep their mouths shut gotta be thugs,Street rep.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. Cops have a right to kill you if you misunderstand, or don't follow their royal decrees fast enough.
) these days. All this nonsense on guns only applies to California...maybe New York and a couple of other places. Doesn't resonate with the rest of the country.....
This article gives a bit more detail about what the proposed legislation might mean in practical terms: California lawmakers propose legislation restricting when officers can open fire
I'm not sure what the president would have to do with this proposed state law.
What does Federal law have to do with states law when the state allows pot but the FEDS can trump those laws..........
LOGIC......
