Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 58,568
- 11,116
- 2,140
[Obama would never have made her his Secretary of State if she were unethical. That is simply one of the endless accusations used against her during the election campaigns.No; he ran with it AFTER the campaigns were done and Obama was in the WH. Disgruntled Hillary Supporters were still moping about of course but who really cares about that. I was saying that it became an Issue DURING the Election Campaign and it was via the Hillary machine..."
As with the Steele dossier I am now of the opinion that Hillary gave it the go-ahead. Nothing ILLEGAL about the act I don't think but unethical?? You can't put Hillary and Ethical in the same breath as you well know!!!
Greg
(BTW: love your stuff on Israel; keep up the good work there).
Endless accusations against her were happening since Bill Clinton's Presidency with nothing to show for it.
But, I am having to look this up again to come up with the answer I have seen. Here is one of them, you may check other fact checkers on the subject:]
The answer lies in Democratic, not Republican politics, and in the bitter, exhausting spring of 2008. At the time, the Democratic presidential primary was slipping away from Hillary Clinton and some of her most passionate supporters grasped for something, anything that would deal a final reversal to Barack Obama. (See: Bachmann: Birther issue settled)
The theory’s proponents are a mix of hucksters and earnest conspiracy theorists, including prominently a lawyer who previously devoted himself to ‘proving’ that the Sept. 11 attacks were an inside job. Its believers are primarily people predisposed to dislike Obama. That willingness to believe the worst about officials of the opposite party is a common feature of presidential rumor-mongering: In 2006, an Ohio University/Scripps Howard poll found that slightly more than half of Democrats said they suspected the Bush Administration of complicity in the Sept. 11 attacks.
While there is no grain of truth to either fantasy, there’s something else when it comes to Obama: A visceral reaction against him, a deep sense that the first black president, with liberal views and a Muslim name, must be—in some concrete, provable way—foreign. (See: Mitt: Obama born here. Period.)
![www.politico.com](https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/b4077fb/2147483647/legacy_thumbnail/1200x800%3E/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fs3-origin-images.politico.com%2Fnews%2F110421_obama_birth_lede_ap_605.jpg)
According to the article, the theory that Obama was born in Kenya “first emerged in the spring of 2008, as Clinton supporters circulated an anonymous email questioning Obama’s citizenship.”
The second article, which ran several days after the Politico piece, was published by the Telegraph, a British paper, which stated: “An anonymous email circulated by supporters of Mrs Clinton, Mr Obama’s main rival for the party’s nomination, thrust a new allegation into the national spotlight — that he had not been born in Hawaii.”
Both of those stories comport with what we here at FactCheck.org wrote two-and-a-half years earlier, on Nov. 8, 2008: “This claim was first advanced by diehard Hillary Clinton supporters as her campaign for the party’s nomination faded, and has enjoyed a revival among John McCain’s partisans as he fell substantially behind Obama in public opinion polls.”
Claims about Obama’s birthplace appeared in chain emails bouncing around the Web, and one of the first lawsuits over Obama’s birth certificate was filed by Philip Berg, a former deputy Pennsylvania attorney general and a self-described “moderate to liberal” who supported Clinton.
But none of those stories suggests any link between the Clinton campaign, let alone Clinton herself, and the advocacy of theories questioning Obama’s birth in Hawaii.
![www.factcheck.org](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Cruz6.png)
Was Hillary Clinton the Original 'Birther'? - FactCheck.org
Two Republican presidential candidates claim the so-called "birther" movement originated with the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2008. Some of her ardent supporters pushed the theory, but there is no evidence Clinton or her campaign had anything to do with it.
![www.factcheck.org](https://www.factcheck.org/android-icon-192x192.png)
Thanks about Israel