Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No .. it's like filing a claim. It's based on the event date and time. If you switch healthcare companies during your employment and file a claim, having a different healthcare payor doesn't change the outcome.
Here is info on the NY case against Trump (which means: Against America since the case is BS and being used for election interference)
But I haven't heard anywhere that the immunity given presidents does or does not last after he leaves office. I know it doesn't last for all alleged "crimes" but... well, anyway, if anyone knows..
I understood you until that last sentence. But I get the gist of it.No .. it's like filing a claim. It's based on the event date and time. If you switch healthcare companies during your employment and file a claim, having a different healthcare payor doesn't change the outcome.
If you file a claim for .. oh .. heart surgery and then switch healthcare companies, the healthcare claim is still the liability of the healthcare provider at the time of service. Just like replacing a roof or having a car accident. The new provider isn't liable for the claim.I understood you until that last sentence. But I get the gist of it.
The thing is, Trump disputed the election results AFTER he allegedly lost the 2020 election. But even if he didn't have immunity.. (he was still the acting president, though), doesn't even a regular citizen have the right to question elections?A president is immune to any and all acts taken in his capacity as president as a consequence of his authority as president, no matter what imbecilic democrats have to say.
OK, thanks. . I thought that's what u meantIf you file a claim for .. oh .. heart surgery and then switch healthcare companies, the healthcare claim is still the liability of the healthcare provider at the time of service. Just like replacing a roof or having a car accident. The new provider isn't liable for the claim.
Questioning the election is not within the course and scope of presidential actions. Neither is questioning the election illegal. Questioning the election is not one of the charges imbecilic democrats are bringing.The thing is, Trump disputed the election results AFTER he allegedly lost the 2020 election. But even if he didn't have immunity.. (he was still the acting president, though), doesn't even a regular citizen have the right to question elections?
Scary because I thought in America that was the case
another one of those "that's what I get for thinking" things.. ?
Yeh, I knew that was ONE of the charges, but aren't there about 10 charges LOL? And who can keep up with all of them?Questioning the election is not within the course and scope of presidential actions. Neither is questioning the election illegal. Questioning the election is not one of the charges imbecilic democrats are bringing.
When Trump said "Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard" the imbeciles are tring to say that was calling for the overthrow of the government.
The immunity covers things while the president was in office and extends forever for those things while the president was in office. It does not cover things that happened after a president leaves office.
Here is info on the NY case against Trump (which means: Against America since the case is BS and being used for election interference)
But I haven't heard anywhere that the immunity given presidents does or does not last after he leaves office. I know it doesn't last for all alleged "crimes" but... well, anyway, if anyone knows..
Those 5 seconds of his speech were not, the other 3555 seconds of his speech ...were.Questioning the election is not within the course and scope of presidential actions. Neither is questioning the election illegal. Questioning the election is not one of the charges imbecilic democrats are bringing.
When Trump said "Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard" the imbeciles are tring to say that was calling for the overthrow of the government.
US Presidents aren't kings.
Here is info on the NY case against Trump (which means: Against America since the case is BS and being used for election interference)
But I haven't heard anywhere that the immunity given presidents does or does not last after he leaves office. I know it doesn't last for all alleged "crimes" but... well, anyway, if anyone knows..
well, I knew it didn't cover things that happened, but was wondering about a case where maybe the president was addressing some of the things that occurred while he was there.. I don't know, it just seems likeThe immunity covers things while the president was in office and extends forever for those things while the president was in office. It does not cover things that happened after a president leaves office.
Give us an example.Those 5 seconds of his speech were not, the other 3555 seconds of his speech ...were.
