- Thread starter
- #181
To deflect WHAT? You've still provided NO EVIDENCE for an argument (that Hansen and Mann and Romm committed the same 'crime' as Soon) that has absolutely NO BEARING on Soon's case.
Do you and do you not have evidence that Soon did NOT lie when he signed statements claiming he had no conflicts of interest?
Do you and do you not have evidence that Soon did NOT lie when he signed statements claiming he had no conflicts of interest?